Is it fair to generalise all women based on the behaviour of a handful of them?
>>83679371>a handfulI lol'ed
>>83679371you bust down some hydro i bust down a beer
>>83679371yesgreater male variability tells us that women are for more alike than anyone is willing to admit
I would say it is wrong. But thinking more about it, it isn't too wrong as long as you don't take yourself extremely serious. The truth is that man and woman alike are a bunch of dicks, so fuck them, think what you believe you should think about them. And base yourself in your own experience, never rely too much on 4chan.
>>83679371How come women have zero survival instinct? Why do they think these killers won't just want to kill them too?
>>83680702My experience with women is basically precisely exactly like /r9k/ says they are. Before I first had interactions with them, I thought /r9k/ was just silly shitposting. I thought of women as "mini men" in a way, and fell for all the memes like that they're more empathetic, better carers, more romantic... it's exactly the opposite. They're cold, dry, self-centered, completely unable to comprehend other people having different feelings or thoughts, they are vain and shallow, completely incapable of taking constructive feedback, and worst of all: when they try to harm a man by giving constructive feedback, they get pissed to hell when it doesn't have the desired effect and the man actually takes it to heart and acts upon the feedback. They are also lazy, dirty, and unhygienic as a rule. They never think about their partner except if they think they can get something out of it.So really, my personal experience is: absolutely base yourself on what 4chan says, it seems to be spot on to a level that genuinely frighten me. It is extremely demoralizing to find out women are like that.Although this is based primarily on a sample size N=3 from primary sources, it is also N=7 from secondary sources.
>>83679371Nice means sexy btw, they dont give a shit about kindness
>>83679371what exactly do I stand to gain from NOT generalizing them? every assumption I have about women saves me from immense amounts of headache, stress, drama, and financial liability
>>83679371yoooo waddup nigga im lowk a serial killer bro
>>83680894h-hot, wanna date me? uwu
>>83680851My experience is similar. However, I'd say that it's because men have greater variability like >>83679385said.I dipped out of normie social circles early on and found cool men I enjoyed hanging out with. These are people who, usually, through hardship, learned to introspect and not play constant social hierarchy games. Women seem more isolated from the pressures that create that kind of introspection, they can coast by on social easy mode for the most part. And maybe because of their great neurotic tendencies, they tend to adopt a very hive-minded-esque behaviour.Due to that, most women aren't usually that bad, but they are just kinda entitled and barely developed their personality.
>>83681038That's exactly in line with my current hypotheses on the subject. I came to this conclusion instead by looking at women who are actually competent in the workplace vs those who aren't and doing the same comparison with men. My conclusion is that the pressure that is usually put on men and not put on women force the men to excel where women can just coast through. Sometimes, the pressure landscape is not applied this way, and it really shows in both directions. I posited that the same ought to be true in other dimensions. But this is obviously just a thought not supported by evidence at this point as far as I'm concerned.
>>83681131It's frustrating because if it is true, it means you are, in a way, actually punished for doing and being good. If you did the work and want a relationship with a woman who is an equal, you are incredibly unlikely to find one.
