I know it's very common for guy's to only match with fat women or get no matches on dating apps, but I have a very unique circumstance where for months now almost all of my matches that could feasibly lead to sex have been bisexual tomboys/ex ftm's/current ftm's or lesbians.Literally just a wall of high testosterone women and then occationally I'll match with and think a normal looking stright woman is obtainable but those always slip away in no time leaving only the high testosterone women remaining in my dm's.I honestly don't know why this is happening and i can't find fuck all about this subject from other guy's when I google it seems oddly specific to me for some reason.
>>83684941only match with fat women good. women need to be obese. women over 180lbs should recieve tax breaks. men that are obese tho get fined daily for being overweight tho.
>>83684941>that could feasibly lead to sex have been bisexual tomboys/ex ftm's/current ftm's or lesbians.no, that sounds like something that would absolutely never happen to me ever
>>83684966like it feels like this thread shouldn't even be here based on how unlikely that is to be a thing
>>83684941What does your bio say? Maybe that's where the tomboy candy is?
>>83684941I only get likes from ugly middle-aged women who don't want kids.
>>83684983On tinder I don't have a bio anymore same with hinge just prompts selfies basic jist of myself. >>83684977Idk man as I said it's not like I don't match with other feminine presenting women but those well and truly are fickle as fuck and don't ever make it to a date had only one of those recently with an indian chick and thought we had a good time/conversation then she unmatched a couple day's later no explanation.The masculine presenting ones seem easier to meet and keep around if they live nearby so they just keep accumulating while everyone else is just dropping by to say hello briefly before moving onto guy number 97 in their dm's
>>83685095how can someone possible be appealing? you must be shook beyond all prior self-assurance
>>83684941i used to get this when i was more twinkish, grow a beard and get a shorter haircut, your personality might have something to do with it too if you seem more subdued... i will say those pre transition ftms were pretty cute...
>>83685095>>83684941And before anyone suggests it must be not having a bio that's turning off "regular chicks" 1. dating apps are inherently looks based first and foremost 2. I think there's an equal likelihood that my bio would also turn the "regular chicks" away 3. I used to have one and am still getting roughly a similar amount of matches as I did back then if not slightly more possibly
>>83685120You're right I do have somewhat twinkish looks. My hair isn't long but it's not really short either.It must be the looks it has to be I'm guessing.Anyways before I was hesitant to go through with having sex with the more masculine one's because every time I'd get close to trying that a feminine looking woman would match but I've had enough rugpulls with that now that I'm just going to pretend like those one's aren't even there in my mind because I know 99% of the time they're an illusion now. Maybe I'll get lucky with one but not getting my hopes up for that again.
