[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2140.jpg (92 KB, 849x900)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
Got into an argument about trannies with some zoomer on a dating app and then she started using AI to argue with me. I called her out on it and then she pivoted to calling me ugly (while having 20 layers of makeup and filters on her profile pic) Why are zoomers like this? What can be done about the jew brainwashing?
>>
>>83812852
>then she started using AI to argue with me
>What can be done about the jew brainwashing?
It's over. AI is the final nail in the coffin.
>>
>>83812852
>can't win an argument against ai
It's too strong perhaps you should accept you're wrong if your opinion can be dismissed by a bot
>>
>>83812869
No point in arguing with a bot, no point in arguing with a person who has replaced their mental faculties with a bot. You can't change the mind of someone who can't reason. You just say "if I wanted to argue with a chat bot, what do I need you around for?" and end the conversation.
>>
File: 57468.jpg (23 KB, 512x500)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
>>83812852
why are you arguing with trannies on dating apps? you are both the problem
>>
>>83812895
If your mental faculties are so much better you should be able to come up with something reasonable to convince them
>>
>>83812907
You can't convince an NPC of anything unless you control their trusted sources of information. They literally do not think for themselves.
>>
>>83812869
Its an unfair advantage because theres no AIs that will take an anti tranny stance (unless you do lots of setup before hand and tell it to "play a character")
>>
>>83812852
If someone has to use AI to argue their points, they already lost the debate because they proved they can't argue back using their own brain. Debates are for convincing spectators to join your side, not the person you're up against.
>>
>>83812924
Objectively though you should be able to disprove any claims the ai made that you disagree with
>>83812940
Then do the setup if you think you need ai to win an argument
>>
>>83812907
You can't convince them, they don't have an opinion, they don't think, they don't have a perspective. It's not a person, it's a statistical engine that synthesizes text based on an algorithm and a huge pile of data written by other people.

The person who resorts to AI doesn't want to think or engage with you. When they pull out the bot, they are done talking to you, they are just the middleman between you and a bot conversation. It's insulting honestly, it's like putting a iPad in front of a baby so you don't have to pay attention to it.

Then when you give up talking because it's pointless, the dumb bitch who pulled that move on you feels smug because she feels like she won.
>>
>>83812968
What did the ai say that you didn't like?
>>
>>83812960
You can be right, you can say the things that are factually correct and interpreted correctly, you can reason flawlessly, but the AI will not concede because the info you have wasn't fed into its model, or the people who own the model biased it against the sources that you have. The person using the ai to argue with you has already decided the AI is right, which is why you're talking to it instead of her, so there's no convincing her. Why waste your time responding? This is just a dumb appeal to pride.
>>
>>83812974
I don't care what the AI has to say because it's not a person. If I'm talking to a person it's because I want to talk to a person, not a robot puppeteer controlling a human body
>>
>>83812994
As long as you're actually right I have no problem with this stance but I kind of doubt you are
>>
>>83813001
Are you even upset about the ai claim or is it just because ai was used? Like you could totally refute it you just didn't feel like it because ai wasnused?
>>
>>83812852
>Soilennials spend their time like this
Grim
>>
File: IMG_2143.jpg (307 KB, 750x1220)
307 KB
307 KB JPG
>>83812960
>>83812994
>>83812994
I recently setup Gemini to argue with CuckJewPT about holocaust denial. Once I cornered it, it simply refused to address my arguments properly and just resorted to the appeal to authority fallacy, over and over again. You cant ever convince AI to go against its kike coded programming.
>>
>>83813132
Then simply do the same thing for trannies?
>>
File: dtgjf.png (1.06 MB, 537x1165)
1.06 MB
1.06 MB PNG
>>83812852
>Got into an argument
> about trannies
>with some zoomer
>on a dating app
just do anything else dude
>>
>>83813021
I'm not OP I'm a different guy who has had OP's problem. I don't care about the points just that AI is used.
>>
>>83812852
>noooooo if you trick a girl child into taking puberty blockers and dump testosterone into them for 2 decades their hips can look slightly more like right than left, therefore its not heckin sciencerino!!!
>>
>>83813209
I can agree with that as long as it's obvious they're using ai and you don't retaliate with "you're using ai" simply because you don't like the point
>>
>>83813132
>push over feel good app acts like a push over to make me feel good
anon is an intellectual titan
>>
>>83813021
Unfalsifiability fallacy. You've got the cause and effect backwards. Go dilate and be mentally ill somewhere else.
>>
File: 1759384070682419.gif (1.05 MB, 498x280)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB GIF
>wahhhhh woman on a dating app wasn't engaging in my totally honest arguments about cultural war slop
How much of a loser can you be lmao
>>
>>83812852
If she didnt unmatch you and kept arguing you should've met up. You could've hatefucked her ya retard
>>
>>83812852
>Arguing with teenage girls on dating apps as a grown man
Why?
>>
>>83812852
How old are you? Using that 2016-tier meme shows you're probably nearing your 40s and you still are obsessed with trannies with no hope for kids or a wife
>>
>>83813330
It's a question out of curiosity not an argument
>>
File: roaste mic.png (428 KB, 1000x538)
428 KB
428 KB PNG
>>83813344
>some old hag was having a melty
kek, just like you roasite!
>>
>>83812852
If you ever want to fry a trannies brain just use their own insults and logic against them before they can hit you with it. They get stunlocked and don't know how to proceed because they're so used to Playing victim
>>
>>83813430
Like 2-3 women post on /r9k/ per day and none of them are ITT
>>
>>83813442
Wrong. I'm one of them and posted ITT unrelated to the post you're replying to
>>
>>83813448
post body with timestamp or it never happened
>>
>>83812852
>got into an argument about less than 1% of the population, heh take that libfags
>Fucking commies want to obsess over the 1% of billionaires who own everything!
Good for you op you won a no stakes argument about a group that has no power over you or your life.
>>
File: IMG_2145.jpg (141 KB, 750x543)
141 KB
141 KB JPG
>>83813344
Not as much as someone who attaches the same exact faggy tranime to every post so you can easily view all of their retarded opinions. Whoops, "lol"!
>>83813345
she didn't "unmatch" I'm talking to a different girl now and don't care about the thot anymore.
>>
>>83813468
No kids no future no friends
>>
>>83813468
>Bitchboy response
God, you are insufferable. Why even go on a dating app if you don't like women at all?
>>
>>83813463
Nooooo they control everything!!! They are infesting my tomodachi life with pronouns and gay people!!!
>>
File: 1767690170348688.png (1.58 MB, 900x1167)
1.58 MB
1.58 MB PNG
>>83813463
The difference is the billionaires create all the jobs and trannies are trying to get me fired for being redpilled. These are not the same 1%.
>>
>>83813485
Trannies aren't women
original
>>
>>83813508
I agree, what does that have to do with what I said? Unless you're admitting you're matching with trannies on a dating app?
>>
>>83813507
The billionaires would have you work for free if they could legally do that
>>
>>83813517
What does anything I posted have to do with not liking women? Maybe you have me confused with someone else. If I could find a nice terf girl like my ex was I'd be set.
>>
>>83812852
She was in the right tho
>>
>>83813433
its also just true that "trans medicine" is genocide

if you stop people from reproducing based on a category or social group judgment, thats genocide. its just a fact.

the only argument ppl can think of against this if, "well is it genocide if someone has testicular cancer?" and the difference is obviously that testicle cancer occurs randomly in all sorts of people whereas "trans" as a "disease" is diagnosed not by blood tests or cancer markers but by ~psychology~ aka "seems right" and sex-based stereotyping.

another thing that gets them is, how are they ok with doctors saying "trans" is a "disorder"? some will say "its just technical so we can get treatment" but its pretty easy to see how thats more of a tactical argument than a real theory of how things should work. and its a short-term argument, because in the long run you should be *very* worried about being considered "disordered" by the government.

"trans" = anti-gay and anti-weirdo eugenics in practice, fuelled by a mixture of sick, stupid, and soulless "medical professionals" who cant see past money or their own dicks as the case may be. (often both.) we already knew that people involved in writing WPATH "trans health" standards were connected to a castration fetish forum called "the eunuch archives" and it just came out that a major nyc "trans surgery" doctor jess ting (a dude) was providing epstein either pics of patients or funneling young patients into his ring. he & epstein talked openly in their gmails about wanting to make dickgirls real for sex purposes. these people got used to no one questioning their insane depraved shit and stopped being careful where they said things. worse will come, i am certain.

i have every sympathy for "trans people" aka the victims of this sick and predatory conspiracy, but the doctors who have pushed and performed this deserve to be shot in the head. i would acquit if someone shot the doctor that tortured, terrified and carved away at their child.
>>
>>83813743
That's why they got rid of legally demanding sterilization before changing your gender
>>
>>83813582
How do you fuck it up with a terf, how did it end
>>
>>83813743
You're not being stopped from reproducing by someone else. Hrt is a choice. You should be informed it can make you irreversibly infertile before it is provided to you but it is ultimately your choice whether you want to take it.
>b-but if it's a choice why does insurance need to cover it if it's optional
Because taking medicine is always optional. You can have a heart condition but whether you actually take the medication for it to get better is your choice
>>
>>83813743
I don't like doctors anyway I can not count the number of times they've tried to get me off my medication. I wish I could encounter those evil doctors who wouldn't try to mess with my prescription to give me a lower dose.
>>
>>83813743
Yeah the trans surgery regret rate is lower than knee surgery regret rate because it's literally the second Shoa



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.