>low birth ratesWomen would have more kids if they were property. If men had to buy their wife, they would probably have multiple children to make better use of the investment. Plus she would take care of them and do all the chores, which makes it easier.>crimeWomen wouldn't vote if they were property. No more pro crime politicians.In case you haven't noticed, the two main political parties everywhere have very close ideologies to each other, people say its "because they're bought and work for the same guys", and they are, but its also a matter of strategy, like when fast food chains open stores next to each other. Meaning if all voters were more conservative, all political parties would too.>economyHousing would be way, way cheaper with higher birth rates, because boomers would have relatively less voting power, so no intentional sabotaging of the market like Trump's to cater to them. With cheaper housing, everyone would have more disposable income. There would also be much easier to get a job without women working.>incelsNo more inequality among men based on facial aesthetics = no more inceldom. We would effectively redistribute women.
Bumopper
incels would still get fucked overall the women would be traded amongst normalfags and chadspeople in the past preferred to send their daughters to convents/temples than give them away to some sub-4 subhuman, autistic piece of shit who works as a grave digger and lives on the outskirts of the village cause people can barely tolerate his existence
>>83838619>incels would still get fucked overwe'd still have less crime. I'm okay with that
>>83838158Increased births and increased households requiring a full home and property increases demand. Developed homes would cost more money. The only argument you have is about police brutality and what democracy looks like.
>>83838158Would you want to be made property?Would you want to be "redistributed" to an ugly person?
>>83838158All of the jewish stuff OP
>>83838158I'm willing to settle for a foid draft, women have been underrepresented for too long within the armed forces especially frontline infantry combatants and deserve preferential draft notices to insure that at least a minimum of 50% of soldier are women, historically women were forbidden from taking these roles therefore the government and NGO's should insure that we makeup for our past mistakes. Preferably starting with sending all the Ukrainian foid leeches straight into the perioidgrinder
>>83839030>Would you want to be made property?>Would you want to be "redistributed" to an ugly person?I'm not for this idea in the slightest, people should obviously be free. But this does sound good with me as long as they're a woman.
The economy would collapse. You also don't need a super high fertility rate if you have replacement migration coming in.
>>83839395So we just force 3rd world countries to live in horrific conditions and use them like breeding factories to prop up our declining populations? Sounds horrific
>>83839432There's no breeding factories. The situation is completely organic and voluntary.
>>83839470>The situation is completely organic and voluntary.Yeah I'm sure they love it there lol
>>83839487Who cares if turd countries are ideal? You should be focused on your own country.
>>83839432Global brown favelaism is good because it just is ok
>>83838158Take a look at muslim societies and then come back to me. You can't discriminate against 50% of the population, whether its men or women
Lol foid draft. The second a foid draft happens every woman in the U.S will get themselves pregnant to avoid it
>>83838158https://odysee.com/@colttaine:d/Communism-For-Two:3
