Would you have been an Epstein client?
>>83838721No Anon. I would have been a victim :^(
Everyone wants to say "of course not" but absolute power corrupts absolutely, you never know what depravity you'd go along with just to keep your wealth.
>>83838721I'm going to the parties, yes. At least onve to check it out and see if it's as good as he lers on.
>>83838721Just go to Europe where having sex with sixteen year olds is legal.
>>83838721As tantalizing as loli's are, I don't think I can handle the risk of being blackmailed.
It's still unclear whether Epstein had trannies on the island or not.But if he had trannies, I'd be one of the "victims".
>>83838721>not rich>not famous>have no position of power or influenceNope.
>>83838721Epstein didn't have clients.
>>83838721I mean, I do have a lot of fucked up fetishes. But I already find the idea of fucking regular escorts to be too morally reprehensible to do. Let alone the shit Epstein was getting up to. So no, I don't think so.
>>83838721no, and neither would my beloved
>>83838721no, i've always been anti semitic even as a kid, instinctively.
Would I have sex with a teenager not realizing it would be used against me to get political favors? As I understand it, attitudes were more lax in the early 2000s and most politicians must have suspected what they were doing would be considered commonplace by 2025, which is why the controlled media pushed so hard in the opposite direction around 2010. Frog in a pot type shit.
>>83838721Probably not cause the government said there were no clients....And....Mister Metokur told me this was just a commie liberal divide and conquer tactic in his "Grift of Charlie Kirk's corpse" stream at 1:48:46https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTBcz_HpuFw&t=6526s
>>83839244https://youtu.be/gQO2cWkW-bY?si=WyElfClgeMxsqHZb
>>83839244https://youtu.be/jNVVBcO5MrI?si=y56x4ZWi_t6dWw92
