Anons, if women consider themselves so discriminated in America, why do they go out of their way to mouth off to their superiors so much? Are they stupid?
>>83849117They aren't really, and they know it, they're just doing it to demoralize you.
>>83849481It's working, anon.
>>83849837>aaaaaaaaa help me i'm being discriminated against in my fake email job where i get to go to starbucks 12 times a day and take a 4 hour peloton class at lunchwomen aren't real
>>83849117I don't like how ideologues are deceptive with their slogans. Take for example this "Feminism: equality for all" in picrel. The two premises of feminism is that the society is a patriarchy, and that dismantling said patriarchy is should be strived for. So it definitionally doesn't acknowledge systemic discrimination that men experience or the systemic privileges women experience. They define inequality in such a way that only women are victims of it, and that in effect only those inequalities should be strived towards being ameliorated. So they aren't lying when they say feminism is about equality for all, they are sneaking in a premise that makes it a movement solely focused on addressing women's issues.
>>83849902in other words, they're lying and they just hate men, which we already knew
>>83849948A lie would mean they are intentionally telling you something they don't believe to be true. They do believe the premises of their statements.
>>83849979They don't believe in equality for all, except in the sense that they don't believe the bottom 80-95% of men to be humans at all and therefore not deserving of any rights. They just say that to trick male feminists into joining their cause as useful idiots.
>>83849981>They don't believe in equality for allThey do, if you accept their premises. If you don't, then from your point of view they don't stand for equality for all. But from their point of view they do. I just take issue with sneaking those premises into conversations or slogans. Which might not necessarily be malicious. Your interlocutor might simply believe that those premises are so self-evidently true, that it's redundant to spell them out.
>>83849117oppression females will face in the west in 20 years will make taliban look like a feminist movement, pendulum has swung toooo far into the one side and now its time to swing to the other
>>83850082Absolute fiction, anon. But it's a nice thought that karma might exist.
>>83850082Don't just imagine, go out and be the change you'd like to see in the world.
>>83850102half of zoomer men and outright majority of alpha gen men oppose female equality. what do you think will happen once they become older?
>>83850137No, trust me, I would love to be proven wrong and reap the benefits of a world where women suffer consequences. I just need to see proof of it happening first.
>>83850082I don't want women to be oppressed. I want them to stop believing in the falsehood that the western society they live in is a patriarchy and that systemic discrimination against men doesn't exist.
>>83850218We're far past the point of forgiveness, anon. Penalties need to be handed out. Women should count themselves fortunate if they can at least remain comfortable during those times.
>>83850006>if you accept their premisesWhy would anyone who deals in reality do that?>But from their point of view they do. No they know they're lying. It's a humiliation ritual to see how many cucks they can reel in.
