I'm not partial to this guy's thread at all but it's the most verbose one in the catalog right now that isn't a greentext. What think. Like 4chan but in a boke(Middle English used for humorous effect) Keeping with the theme, would greentexts still use meme arrows? They wouldn't really be necessary if you could just use quotes
>>83851406>antinatalist is too retarded to format such that his drivel isnt a chore to readimagine my shock
>>83851420Low IQ nigger that can't read I'm not an antinatalist I couldn't give two shits about antinatalism or his thread I'm just using his thread as lorum ipsum placeholder text now tell me if greentexts would look better with meme arrows or not
>>83851509i'll let it slide because i was being imprecise in what i was trying to say.im talking about the thread youre talking about, not about you.im telling you that not making well-thought out posts palpable is an awful idea, meme arrows (or just pressing enter sometimes) might've helped his case on the surface.that being said, i dont understand how your attempt at formatting is supposed to be an improvement.that's still just a wall of text written by a dumbass whose thoughts aren't original or interesting.
>>83851551Maybe squint and don't read it It's not about what it says
>>83851706it is, indirectly:if you read the first sentence of an unstructured text and it's drivel, there's no incentive (especially not on the internet) to follow along.if you read the first sentence of a structured text and it's drivel, might as well read the second just to see where we're going.do you disagree? what do you think? does this benefit readability?
>>83851729If you were making a parody of 4chan style into writing would you use the color scheme or is that gay and larp
>>83851769depends on the medium you're doing it for.if print: noif youtube video or social media post: yes
