Where can I find internet people who are economically right-wing and socially left-wing?This position seems to be very difficult to find online. Everything is some variant of slopulist retardation. All I've really got is https://www.reddit.com/r/neoliberal, but reddit sucks
>>83874111Kys buddy boyo
>>83874111Some of my online friends recently went to the pro-billionaire march in CA, but their total showing was like 20 people. I need a better community.
Most Burger libertarians are kinda how you describe.Also, it does depend on what exactly you mean by "socially left wing".I'm a eurofag. In my country the commies killed fags and the right put a stop to that. To this day, there's more homophobia on the left.Meanwhile, I take estrogen. The Left wants to put me through a humiliation ritual and long waiting lists. The right simply doesn't give a shit, which is the superiour position.The far-left is into neopronouns and shit. I'm okay with that but not through the force of the state as I privilege free speech over feelings, especially in Europe which already has too much censorship.Btw, pro censorship is the socially left wing position allover Europe.Point being: define your terms a little bit.
>>83874184>Meanwhile, I take estrogen. The Left wants to put me through a humiliation ritual and long waiting lists. The right simply doesn't give a shit, which is the superiour position.At least in the US, and probably the UK, and probably most places, that is definitely not true. The right thinks trans people are subhuman vermin, even if most others just want to pearl-clutch. I'm not trans but after speaking to enough trans people on the subject, I've concluded a libertarian/let people do what they want without gatekeeping approach is the best (largely including for minors who wish to take cross-sex hormones, as well)In the US libertarians are basically my position but taken to way too much of an extreme. I just want the government to largely avoid interfering with the economy or overly taxing corporations or overly imposing regulations on corporations. I don't want them to go away entirely, and for moral reasons I believe the government should provide welfare to the poor and needy.
>>83874111I am curious, how would you personally benefit from an economically right wing government?
You need to realize the new age left wing are republicans who are too afraid to be hated on. Everyone and their is republican. The new media and internet is just making people hide their true opinions. I went to berkley and all the guys were republicans who pretended to be lefties for pussy and it worked. They fucked so many feminist whores I got to see first hand
>>83874199>At least in the US, and probably the UKThe world is much bigger than that.>and probably most places, that is definitely not trueYou are simply wrong.The right in Brazil has troon candidates. I live in Czechia and I'm a member of the "far right" (really the libertarians who like guns and borders).In neighboring Poland both the mainstream left and the mainstream right gradually eliminated gatekeeping. In Switzerland it's also the Right who has been more trans friendly.Not to mention in Thailand where it's a right wing dictatorship. Or Serbia which has top-tier troon clinics with a perpetual right wing (tho authoritarian) government where HRT is over-the-counter for anyone.>largely including for minors who wish to take cross-sex hormones, as wellMy compromise is at the age of sexual consent. Which is 15 here.If we trust minors to have sex and get married, then surely we can also trust them to take cross-sex hormones.>I'm not transWell, I'm not either (according to troons) even though I'm chemically indistinguishable to them. Meh. The angloid troon "community" has been doing itself a lot of disservice.>I just want the government to largely avoid interfering with the economy or overly taxing corporations or overly imposing regulations on corporations. I don't want them to go away entirelyAgreed. Minimal state.>and for moral reasons I believe the government should provide welfare to the poor and needyStrongly disagree. Taxation is already theft. But it's outright immoral to rob me to provide welfare to leeches.For moral reasons I support the abolition of any and all form of central welfare provision. Let everything be run locally, at a locality level. So I can move with my friends in a locality where welfare is forbidden and any elected official proposing it gets automatically blacklisted while bleeding hearts can form their own gigacommie communes where they rob themselves into "prosperity" for bullshit moral reasons.
>>83874280>believes in moralitydisgusting. You trade one master for another. What's the point. Lick the boot some more.
>>83874111Populism/MAGA destroyed the center right, it's probably not coming back for a long time, there's simply nobody left to advocate for it.
>>83874211>I am curious, how would you personally benefit from an economically right wing government?You realize intelligent people think about more than just their personal wellbeing, right?I would eventually benefit in the long-term, probably, since I work in the tech industry and make use of a lot of tech corporations' products and services. But even before working in tech, I had the same positionI also support higher taxes on higher-income people, even though that would hurt me. Only primitive beasts think in the way you're implying.
>>83874438I am definitely much more center-left than center-right. Just my position on economics is seemingly so uncommon (especially among "the youth" / popular culture) that it makes me seem right or center-right. I'm practically a SJW on sociocultural issues. (Of course, socialists would all call me a fascist, or whatever.)
>>83874111>socially left-wingdo you mean socially liberal?
>tfw you want men to have full rectums more than you want children to have full belliesfind the contact info of like minds in mr epsteins black book anon
>CapitalismWhat has it really done for you that you are willing to go to bat for it?
>>83874138California is so fucked. The middle class is going extinct you are either a richfag or welfare dependent with no in between
>>83874111hitler was that I'm pretty sure
>>83874545>>socially left-wing>do you mean socially liberal?Yes. I am just using simpler terms, because economically liberal means economically right while socially liberal means socially left
>>83874111>Where can I find internet people who are economically right-wing and socially left-wing?Oxymoron.Read road to serfdom.
>>83874280>For moral reasons I support the abolition of any and all form of central welfare provision. Let everything be run locally, at a locality level. So I can move with my friends in a locality where welfare is forbidden and any elected official proposing it gets automatically blacklisted while bleeding hearts can form their own gigacommie communes where they rob themselves into "prosperity" for bullshit moral reasons.That was a good libertarian take.
>>83874771this is your brain on liberalism. leftists believe in the nuclear family and that sodomy is a bourgeois perversion
>>83874530>You realize intelligent people think about more than just their personal wellbeing, right?They mean how will it benefit anyone that isn't insanely wealthy?>also support higher taxes on higher-income peopleThat's not right wing
>>83874111probably nowhere because being left wing isn't about economics at all (anymore)
>>83874211https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
>>83874811>because being left wing isn't about economics at all (anymore)Left wing always starts with >gibs me your things for free You rug pull economic from under leftist and he collapses. There can't be left wing without leftists taking your shit by force.
>>83874820yeah and the issue in the US is they're very clearly trying to steal things that White people have to hold their coalition together. libs could go back to the good old days of caesar chavez or something, but the issue is they don't have hardly any actual workers anymore. they have a fraction of the laptop class and a bunch of welfare leeches.
>>83874111Destiny shills are too transparent
>>83874832did TINY tell all his gay fanboys to try and make threads like this to "convert" people or something?
>>83874199The vast vast majority of the uk anti tranny shit is just terfs who are platformed because we live in a pearl clutching victorian puritan faggot society. Terfs are so far left they become right wing though.
the real question is where all the economically left wing socially right wing people areI have literally NEVER seen on that exists IRL
>>83874814The Holodomor never happened and was made up by Ukrainian neo-Nazis in the 1960s who exaggerated a famine in 1930s USSR that mostly affected ethnic Russians.
>>83874953that's the islamic republic, inshallah
>>83874639>>Capitalism>What has it really done for you that you are willing to go to bat for it?Intelligent individuals understand capitalism leads to far more prosperity than socialism.
>>83874707>hitler was that I'm pretty sureNo, he was the exact opposite
Depends on how you define left-wing. This was the majority of 4chan in the past. It is usually what makes up a libertarian or classical liberal view. 4chan was always contrarianHowever, this has changed as the Overton window has shifted very far left. The main thing is that the leftist policies being pushed now are advocating for authoritarian change or change that directly changes the way most people live. Most libertarian types didn't care what other people did as long as it didn't affect what they were doing or how they are supposed to live. They believed firmly in the golden rule, live and let live, and my rights end where others begin.Gamergate was part of the big culture shift here that opened many eyes to the collapse of their world. The issue is that live and let live doesn't actually work. As soon as someone decides that they don't like the way you live and they demand change, that policy fails. If your politics and culture is that of tolerance of other people's views and beliefs, that will quickly fall if one side has an ideology that "requires" you to think a certain way. The left has become so polarized in one direction now that they actively vilify anyone with viewpoints different than their own. You see that in the rhetoric where anyone with certain views is labelled as a "nazi" or similar view to strawman their views as some monstrous "other". The left now masquerades as being tolerant while being wholly intolerant of anyone with a different view than themselves, yet they will hold that hypocritical stance and justify it under the purview that they cannot allow certain "intolerant" views from being held. The issue is that has spread to anyone with a deferential opinion - or worse a deferential identity due to the rise of identity politics and a new form of "original sin". This pushes the formerly left to a reactionary right in response. It creates the imagined monster as the average person who wanted to be left alone is pushed into a corner.
