It's just natural selection anon
>>84016729poor baby, it doesnt deserve that
>>84016729im going to kill you if you talk this way about punch
>>84016729>le excess male face
>>84016734OP is just a jeet trying to demoralize you, the monkey was eventually accepted.
>>84016798Not his mother though, he's rejected.
you like seeing hurt monkeys don't you opwe all know your typeyou belong in a cage
PUNCH NEEDS TO GET A HOLD OF HIMSELF AND START ACTING LIKE A REAL MAN
>>84016831>saar the monkey being accepted by other monkeys still means it's abandon saar
>>84016873hes a fucking baby you retard
>>84016798>>84016879whats even the correlation here why would an indian hate punch
>>84016879Punchcels will have to settle for a 2/10 stuffed toy instead of being delusional and chasing mommy.
>>84016892/pol/tard having a schizo moment, there was one dude on /gif/ who used to spam videos of him like punching monkeys in the nuts and weird incel torture shit and it was like a white hispanic dude or some shit though
The statement "It's just natural selection anon" pertains to the biological framework initially formalized by Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace. To address this assertion with the requisite level of exhaustive detail and a deliberately monotonous stylistic approach, one must first deconstruct the fundamental mechanisms of evolutionary biology, beginning with the concept of heritable variation within a population.The Foundational Principles of SelectionIn any given biological population, individuals exhibit phenotypic variations. These variations - whether morphological, physiological, or behavioral - must possess a genetic basis to be relevant to the process of natural selection. If we consider a population $P$, the distribution of a specific trait $T$ can often be modeled via a standard distribution curve.Natural selection operates through four primary postulates, which, when sustained over geological timescales, result in the gradual modification of lineages:Overproduction: Populations inherently produce more offspring than the local environment's carrying capacity can support.Variation: Individuals within said population are not identical; they possess diverse traits.Inheritance: A significant portion of this variation is passed from parents to progeny via deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).Differential Survival and Reproduction: Individuals possessing traits that provide a marginal advantage in their specific ecological niche are statistically more likely to survive to reproductive age and successfully find a mate.The Mathematical Reality of FitnessWhen you invoke "natural selection," you are essentially referencing the concept of Relative Fitness ($w$).
>>84016729poor monkey, can't he be put somewhere else, would other monkeys accept him
>>84016914Fitness is not merely a measure of physical prowess or longevity, but rather a quantitative representation of an individual's contribution to the gene pool of the next generation.If we define the most successful genotype as having a fitness of $w = 1.0$, then a less successful genotype may have a fitness of $w = 1 - s$, where $s$ represents the selection coefficient. The rate at which an advantageous allele increases in frequency within a population can be calculated using the following differential equation regarding change in allele frequency ($\Delta p$):$$\Delta p = \frac{pqs}{1 - sq^2}$$In this equation:$p$ represents the frequency of the dominant allele.$q$ represents the frequency of the recessive allele.$s$ represents the intensity of selection against the homozygous recessive phenotype.As you can see, the process is far from instantaneous. It is a slow, iterative, and often redundant series of environmental filters.Environmental Determinants and ConstraintsIt is also critical to acknowledge that "natural selection" is not an optimizing force seeking perfection. It is a "tinkerer" rather than an "engineer." It can only act upon existing variations. Furthermore, the selection pressure is entirely dependent on the specificities of the environment. A trait that is advantageous in a nitrogen-poor soil environment may become a metabolic burden in a nutrient-rich environment.We must also categorize the modes of selection to be thorough:Directional Selection: Favors one extreme phenotype over the mean or the opposite extreme.Stabilizing Selection: Favors the intermediate variants, reducing variance.
>>84016892>whats even the correlation here why would an indian hate punchThe inquiry into the potential correlation between an individual of Indian national or cultural identity and an aversion to "punch" - a beverage traditionally composed of five ingredients - requires a meticulous examination of historical, linguistic, and material conditions.To address this from a dry, philosophical perspective, we must deconstruct the components of the premise.>Etymological and Colonial IronyThe term "punch" is widely accepted by etymologists to be derived from the Sanskrit word "panca," meaning "five." This was filtered through Middle Indo-Aryan and Hindi ("paanch") before being adopted by British East India Company employees in the early 17th century.Philosophically, this presents a paradox of cultural re-appropriation. If an Indian individual were to express "hatred" for punch, they would be rejecting a construct that is, at its linguistic and conceptual core, a product of their own civilization, albeit one that has been modified, globalized, and returned via the mechanism of colonial trade. One might argue this isn't hatred of the substance, but an existential rejection of the "Colonial Synthesis.">The Phenomenology of Taste and TraditionFrom a phenomenological standpoint, "hatred" of a beverage is rarely about the chemical composition (sucrose, ethanol, water, citric acid, and spice) and more about the "intentionality" behind the object.The Problem of Categorical Generalization: To ask "why" such a correlation exists assumes that the correlation is a stable, observable phenomenon. In the absence of empirical longitudinal studies on the beverage preferences of the Indian diaspora versus the domestic population, the premise remains a "propositional vacuum."
The Materialist Critique: If we look at the transition from traditional "paanch" to the modern "party punch," we see a shift from complex botanical infusions to high-fructose corn syrup and artificial colorants. A rejection here could be interpreted as a rational preference for ontological authenticity over synthetic Western iterations.III. Social SemioticsIn the context of modern social media discourse, the mention of "punch" often exists within specific subcultural memes or niche references.Philosophical ImplicationThe Indian IdentityRepresents a vast, non-monolithic demographic often subjected to "Reductionist Logic."The Act of "Hating"An emotive response that, in a Stoic sense, indicates a judgment that the object is inherently harmful or beneath one's dignity.The CorrelationLikely a "spurious correlation," where two variables appear related but lack a causal mechanism.IV. ConclusionThere is no inherent biological, geographical, or metaphysical reason why an Indian individual would possess an innate distaste for punch. Any observed correlation is likely the result of anecdotal variance or a specific localized context that lacks universal applicability. To seek a deeper meaning is perhaps to engage in the "Teleological Fallacy" - assigning a purpose or grand design to what is merely a random data point in the noise of human preference.
>>84016729Plushies are misogynistic and will feed his sense of entitlement to a female.
>>84016729why are the big apes pushing the monkey, what did the little guy do?
>>84016979He was genetically inferior and gave them the ick.
>>84016992hes a fucking kid you retard hes going to grow up and be big>>84016979theyre scared because they know he'll be the king of the jungle in the future they just want to nip him in the bud rn before he gets strong
>>84017002>hes going to grow up and be bigIf that were the case, then the based and redpilled natural eugenicist female wouldn't have rejected him. Devaluing female choice is a male-centric narrative and it's very harmful.
>>84016979because they're bigger, sometimes the bigger guys bullies the smaller just cause
>>84017030the based and redpilled natural eugenicist female rejected him because theyre retarded and cant think of anything except the presentif they had the capacity to think about the future in their tiny little brains they would be protecting punch knowing that he's going to be the future leader of the zoo
>>84016892indians torture animals all the time, despite outwards appearances being short and saying "sarr" all the time they are vicious and demonic behind closed doors
>>84017056yeah indians are bullies to animals because they are at the bottom for humans
>>84017042Why is it that everyone who has a problem with female choice seems to be in the group that was negatively affected by it and craft their narrative to appeal their rejection as if they were in a courtroom?
>>84017056seeing a vid of one guy doing this and thinking that the entire race does this is a sign of extremely low iq considering the fact that majority of the vids of animals being tortured on the internet have white people in them https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1580700/Smiling-US-Marine-throws-puppy-off-Iraq-hill.html
>>84017056White farmers do worse when they send a cow or piggy to the slaughter mill to make your big mac and tendies you fat fuck, what's the problem retard?
>>84017079>>84017083feels bad man, why are people so mean
>>84017083one is for profit and the other pleasureif you cannot understand why doing something for profit is different from doing it for pleasure then consider this>suck a dick for a billion dollars>suck a dick for freeOne is practical, the other gay.
>>84016963Very true. Zoo employees shouldn't have discretionary "plushies" to give to excess males that can't even put in the bare minimum effort to earn their mother's affection. It's a toxic form of welfare and also objectifies the female body as if it's just something males get access to whenever they have an urge.
>>84017079>considering the fact that majority of the vids of animals being tortured on the internet have white people in them>on the internet>calling someone else low iq while having this piss of a take>reddit spacing
>>84017079Wow, you found an 18 year old article of a white male torturing a dog. I can show you a million videos of chinks and niggers torturing animals for every single instance of white animal torture you dredge up.
>>84016729I hate this homosex world so much
>>84016914>>84016923>>84016941grox summarize this plz
>>84017079>considering the fact that majority of the vids of animals being tortured on the internet have white people in themHave you counted them? Sadism against animals seems to be one of the things where you can find all races doing it unfortunately
>>84017440>men of all racesFTFY
>>84017444Yes, it's really sad that women select for psycopathy and antisocial behavior
>>84016729Punch will rule over them someday.
>>84017444all the animal abusers in my life have been womenWhy are there so many misandrists/misogynists on this board? You're all retarded.
Thread theme, poor monke :( https://youtu.be/NE1zHRAuNWg
punch deserves to get bulliedlook at that rapist>walks up feeling entitled to a hug>other monke says no, lightly pushes him away>punch SCREECHES at the monke and tries to force a hug again>runs away and cries like he's a victimat first I was thinking that the normalfags are hypocrites for having empathy for punch and not lonely incels, but now I see that they are hypocrites because they support sex pest behavior from punch but complain when men do it.
>>84017079Non whites are typically over represented in these things yet your reaction is to close your eyes, ignore patterns and point fingers at white people who tend to be under represented?
>>84017639Sieg Heil my little monke friend.
>>84017639Look at this lill nigga go haha
>>84016892These people are insane. Notice the retarded replies about "Indians torture animals" when there's plenty of documented cases of Asians and white people doing this? This poster is likely some obsessed white Hispanic or Asian freak who has Indians on their mind 24/7
>>84016729>man-made plushies>kept in captivityWhat part of this whole ordeal is natural, OP?
>>84018045They literally aren't you fucking retard. Trump's own son tortured animals as a kid and I've personally known plenty of white kids that do thisPlus some of the most famous videos of people doing this stuff are of kawaii Asian women crushing rabbits beneath their heels. You're insane
>>84016729>those monkeys that will gang up and kill the alpha monkey if hes too much of a nigger, and then kill all the kids that the female monkeys had with him, and the female monkeys will join in on killing their kidsFukken brootal
>>84019069Now you see.. it is you who is kept in captivity!
>>84017071w*memes are livestock, truly
>>84016729wow what an entitled little incel. women don't owe you time or affection you misogynist piece of shit
>>84017002>hes a fucking kid you retard hes going to grow up and be bignot unless he microdoses meth and breaks his legs
>>84017994YEAH YOU'RE NOT ENTITLED TO PHYSICAL CONTACT WITH WOMEN YOU DISGUSTING LITTLE INCEL
