In the ecosystem of online debate, a familiar pattern sometimes appears what we might call the "female response pattern."At first, the female presents a bold claim with confidence and certainty. But when confronted with a clear, structured counterargument, the behavior shifts.One response is withdrawal: silence replaces engagement. The conversation simply ends.If retreat feels unsatisfying, escalation may follow. The focus moves from the argument to the person, name calling, dismissive labels, or accusations take the place of evidence.Another common adaptation is circular reasoning. The original claim is repeated as its own proof: "It's true because it is." The reasoning loops, insulated from outside critique.And when evidence is demanded, anecdote often steps in. A single personal story: vivid, emotional, but statistically weightless, is offered as decisive proof. The exception is treated as the rule.These behaviors are not unique to any one group. They are familiar human defenses against cognitive dissonance: the discomfort of having one's beliefs challenged.
>>84018442nice gptslop
>blahblahblah Calling someone a fag is the ultimate refutation of anything they've said, fag.
>>84018452>retards cant tell the difference between LLMs and regular textGrim
>>84018475>saar thinks he could trick someonegrim
>>84018452is he wrong doe?
>>84018482>cant even speak englishNo wonder you retards need to use chatgpt
>>84018465I agree. OP is the type that responds with a bunch of shit he made up then wants you to prove his falsehoods false. He is just a timewasting midwit
>>84018524>saar doubles down
>>84018535>ESL retard accusing anyone else of being indianIsrael number one
>>84018529lS HE WRONG DOE?
>>84018567>saar deflects again
>>84018442>PIN THIS THREAD NOWthere's nothing valuable in your post.
>>84018578>esl retard gets btfoed and keeps coping>sarrr you are the indian you are doing the chatgpt
>>84018607>saar admits doing the chatgpt
>>84018620>retard doesnt even know what greentexting isHoly shit youre an indian esl who uses chatgpt and a newfagJSID
>>84018635>saaar finally admits defeat
>>84018640>chatjeetpt cant even comprehend the prompt anymore>hes going to keep doing this despite outing himself first reply
>>84018656Saaar feed me more sloppa
>>84018673>saar thinks he could trick someone
>>84018701NOM NOM NOM MORE SLOPPA PLS
>>84018452Can you really not tell the difference between human and llm output? It's a low effort fembrained response used dismissively, so for many calling something ai is a knee-jerk reaction where the words used are entirely unrelated to their meaning. Like when a sexhaver espouses his opinions on the nature of women and is called an incel. But I mean let's pretend we actually were talking about machine generated content, would you not be able to tell if something is written by a human or language model? I find it fascinating to see just how stupid normalfags are. You'll probably lie and say you can tell the difference. So how do you defend your original accusation? Another variant of incel doesn't mean actually celibate?
>>84019098>saar desperately attempts to samefag
Not one person can refute OP.If he had only done this instead.>In the ecosystem of online debate, a familiar pattern sometimes appears what we might call the "moid response pattern."Then there would be agreement.
I'm not OP and I'm revolted at the cretins posting.Yes, OP is right. What he says is self-evident to anyone that has experienced dealing with women. Accountability is their kryptonite
>>84018442Aside from the AI, this is true. One way that I can tell trannies from females posting is that the female will often get non-confrontational extremely quickly and begin saying things like>Well, in my opinion it isn't that way lol>I just don't see how?? lolOften backing down quickly, or in a prolonged interaction, preferring only vague, non-committal statements and passive aggressive remarks. But trannies are still men and still try to aggressively make a failing point.
The cool thing of learning about fallacies is realizing that every time you "lost" an argument was because people censored you through fallacies.
