https://x.com/Pirat_Nation/status/2026371551906451573
>>84033479>Specifically refused to ban Real life incestkek they 100% did it because pakis would riot
>>84033479>Think about incestTHOUGHT CRIME>Actually do incestCULTURAL ENLIGHTENMENT
>>84033479>banning the most popular normie fetishJust ban all porn at this point.
>>84033479Whats up with leftists and their love for anarcho tyranny? There are literal Paki rape gangs and they care more about fake incest in porn.
>>84033479what a very weird thing to focus on.whats going on with britcucks?paki niggers raping their woman and they put their attention on micromanaging gooners?why?
>blacklash against claiming irl incest is good>oh no what do we do to restore public trust>ban incest pornit's L after L after L this timeAt least bumbling boris had some funny picturesAt least teflno tony had some charm
>>84033479Just more arbitrary control laws to enforce on the public. All while ignoring actual mass criminal activity by migrants.All they care about is ruling over a pig pen.
>>84033505because they are passive aggressive spiteful assholes too lazy to be productive
>>84033510Banning things is easy arresting rapist is hard
If you are found in possession of incest fantasy porn you will actually be punished harsher than a a subhuman gangrapes hundreds of girlsWhat is this reality?
>>84033532women literally voted for this. feminist organizations defend paki rape gangs while shitting on white men for things like "manspreading"
>>84033479UK is a weird censoring hellhole.
if you think labour are bad look at what is lurking in the Green party
>>84033545>misogynyI assume UK doesn't have all inclusive draft/conscription laws.
>>84033510it's more to be able to prosecute websites like 4chan. if they don't have illegal content, then they change the law so that content that was other wise is now illegal, and they can now prosecute them or take some sort of legal action for control.
>>84033576Good take.I really need to find one of those chinese backdooring communities and learn their ways
>>84033560green party literally wants to ban men disagreeing with womenthis is what lawyer commented on new green part rulePg 17.This document lists "being corrected" as one example of how women experience "misogynistic" behaviour - an example so broad that it is liable to justify any disagreement between a man and a woman as a sanctionable disciplinary offence.
>>84033646Look deeper and it gets worse. they're also allied with muslim groups somehow.
>>84033479Overwhelmingly women read erotic literature and (((their))) endgame is criminalize the male ejaculation. This doesn't make sense
>>84033646>>84033662greens are the sub-90 IQ party in every country, you will only find the most brain dead, politically illiterate retards supporting greens in their country
>>84033576True, it's probably something like that.
>>84033692they just won a bielection that ousted labourthe cuckright party reform came second
>>84033545>"KILL ALL MEN UNDER 6'0 SLOWLY AND BRUTALLY RIGHT FELLOW WOMEN?!">"Uh, actually that isn't very ni-">"PRIIIIIIIIIIISSSSOOOOOOOOOONNNN!!!"
>>84033749green party are fascists tho
>>84033804>>"KILL ALL MEN UNDER 6'0 SLOWLY AND BRUTALLY RIGHT FELLOW WOMEN?!"That would be too racist.
>>84034082what's the south american country?
>>84034082>SpainWhat? I'm not even that tall, but most of the people I saw in Spain were shorter than me.
