This is the second time this has happened to me on this board. Now I understand why you shouldn't post pics or vocaroos on here. Someone is always gonna save it. Fuck my life. First someone posts a vocaroo I posted years ago like 4 years later, now someone posts a pic I posted like 5 years ago. What the fuck. This is why you don't post shit on here. I didn't think people would save it
>>84059845Need ta learn yo fucken lesson nigga
Cute butthole
>>84059845maybe they reposted you because they liked u or something idk
>>84059845You can't trust anyone on this website /ck/ will sometimes have meetups I'm like hell nah
>>84059845>I didn't think people would save itthe internet is forever. everything everywhere gets saved at some point. learn to use the internet better
This is not a picture of you. It's a confirmed picture of an Italian escort from her listing. You know this behavior Will not bring you home with me.
>>84059845there's a naked photo of me online that somebody took while I was in a changing room and nobody knows I'm like 15 in that photo
>>84059845I have stuff anons posted 20 years ago. Every once in a while I'll see an opportunity to post it, but it doesn't happen often.
>>84061149>there's a naked photo of me online that somebody took while I was in a changing room and nobody knows I'm like 15 in that phototheres probably millions of photos of naked girls underage but theres no way to verify and they look mature so it's like banning petite 25 yr olds with baby faces from taking nudes
>>84061180I've seen it here on 4chan before, a few people inquired about the age of who was in the photo and the op just lied and said it's fake voyeur, I probably look 18+ in it because of my pubes
>>84061180this is changing.>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TAKE_IT_DOWN_Act>The TAKE IT DOWN Act (Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act), signed into law on May 19, 2025, criminalizes the nonconsensual, online publication of intimate images and deepfakes. It mandates that platforms remove such content within 48 hours of a report and establishes FTC enforcement.>https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB11314/LSB11314.1.pdf>https://report.cybertip.org>The Take It Down service is one step you can take to help remove online nude, partially nude, or sexually explicit photos and videos taken before you were 18.
>>84061149>>84061190you. see: >>84061198if you want it gone.
>>84061205Huh, neat, I don't care too much about it, but if I see it again then maybe
>>84061149Stfu indexing the image shows that it is an Italian escort. I found the page where it originates from
>>84061198>Oh no I was young and stupid take down my nudes!>Oh a hottie I will send him nudesJust the endless women want their cake and to eat it too
>>84061268>Stfu indexing the image shows that it is an Italian escort. I found the page where it originates fromhuh? what exactly are you talking about...
>>84061247when you see it, it has to be down within 48 hours or be considered noncompliant. >The Take It Down Act (S.146), introduced in 2025, requires online platforms to remove nonconsensual, intimate, or AI-generated images within 48 hours of a report. It specifically targets, but is not limited to, the abuse of minors, with enforcement overseen by the FTC. This legislation adds to a landscape shaped by the 2018 FOSTA-SESTA laws, which increased platform liability for sex trafficking.>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOSTA-SESTAbtw>https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3696>The DEFIANCE Act (Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits Act) is a bipartisan, bicameral US legislative proposal aimed at combating nonconsensual, sexually explicit AI-generated deepfakes. It allows victims to take civil action against those who create, distribute, or possess such material.ny has its own law.>https://www.new-york-lawyers.org/practice-areas/revenge-porn/unlawful-dissemination-or-publication-of-an-intimate-image/>New York Penal Law 245.15, Unlawful Dissemination or Publication of an Intimate Image, joins Unlawful Disclosure of an Intimate Image, NYC Administrative Code 10-180 (10-177*3), as one of law enforcement's weapons to combat "Revenge Porn" when sexual, naked and intimate images are shared without consent to friends, colleagues, employers, and family members or uploaded to the internet on sites including Reddit, Instagram, Youtube, Facebook or even Pornhub. >Unlike its administrative code "sibling" that applies solely to offenses in one of the five boroughs, Penal Law 245.15 casts a far wider net throughout the state whether an incident occurs in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess or any other county or municipality.
>>84061274see:>>84061149>there's a naked photo of me online that somebody took while I was in a changing room and nobody knows I'm like 15 in that photoalso:>Oh no I was young and stupid take down my nudes!>taking down child pornography is bad!
>>84061149>that somebody tookThe somebody was you
>>84061303I don't know how I would take a photo when my hands were nowhere near the phone
>>84061290https://www.escortads.it/annuncio/3442537289-1476834649892---Meraviglia--100-ITALIANA--21-06-2020?utm_medium=organic&utm_source=yandexsmartcameraThe girl is 25. This is not you
>>84061303so she either created child porn herself and it was distributed online against her wishes or someone created child porn of her and distributed against her wishes. join >>84061274 in continuing to tell everyone how much you love child porn online with your ip and metadata attached on the website with a built-in federal reporting panel.
I've said the same many times. I occassionaly see my nudes come up which had a time stamp and the post number I was referencing just to prove I was a girl. It embarasses me that I was not thinking because I wanted to prove a point. It got worse in the thread completely got derailed because of it and it was impossible to continue discussing what me and a few anons were talking about. Thankfully, my face was blanked out.Lesson learned. Anons can call me a tranny or whatever. It's not happening.
>>84061319You are not special. You're just tits pussy and words.
>>84061313correct? okay? what's that got to do with any of what I said?
>>84061330Whoever was claiming that the OP image was them
>>84061319if this ever gets identified as you and you can prove to legal that it is, you can have it removed.>>84061198>>84061298don't do this again. /r9k/ doesn't allow camwhoring anyway, that is /soc/'s domain and this site has always used camwhoring as a bait to get compromising pics and info to leak. once this is on the internet, it is almost impossible to successfully remove without industry-wide hashing. this is now standard but applies only to reuploads and it will always be somewhere on someone's drive. hard lesson learned. on the plus side, now that camming is a common industry along with onlyfans, the proliferation of this content has far less of a social stigma for distribution. social ramifications are less positive.>>84061328we're all just words.
>>84061351>you can have it removedIt will never go away. That Act posted is just a virtue signaling law and nothing can be done. It's always going to be on someone's hard drive. It's a lesson I just learned the hard way and hope everyone thinks about before they do it.
>>84061351Very rarely is someone true. And when they are it is action. I am true.
>>84061351re: hashing>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoDNA>https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna>In 2009, Microsoft partnered with Dartmouth College to develop PhotoDNA, a technology that aids in finding and removing known images of child exploitation. Today, PhotoDNA is used by organizations around the world and has assisted in the detection, disruption, and reporting of millions of child exploitation images.>https://gifct.org/hsdb/>Known as perceptual hashes, a hash is a numerical representation of original content (video, image, PDF) that cannot be reverse-engineered to recreate the content. These hashes are then added to the database with a series of labels to help other members understand what content corresponds to the hash, including content type, terrorist entity that produced the content, and its behavioural elements. A GIFCT member can then select a hash to see if it identifies and matches to visually similar content on their platform. As a result, members are sharing signals about terrorist content they have identified on their platform so that other members can quickly identify if the same content is shared on their platform and assess it in line with their policies and terms of service. All without sharing any user data between companies.>https://gifct.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/GIFCT-24WG-1224-HSDR-Challenges-1.1.pdfprotip: the man who hired moot at google (bradley horowitz) didn't just work on google+. he was vp of photos and streams too.
>>84061301women never change, they are young and stupid, then old and stupid
>>84061335NOBODY was?? are you alright?
>>84061379>That Act posted is just a virtue signaling law and nothing can be done.not even remotely true. this act is extremely successful just as fosta-sesta has been in getting rid of extreme, non-consensual, and child exploitation content. it's the entire reason why the free speech convo is constantly angry at it and is directly responsible for the payment processor vs porn fight. don't demoralize >for free.>It's always going to be on someone's hard drive. It's a lesson I just learned the hard way and hope everyone thinks about before they do it.i said this.>once this is on the internet, it is almost impossible to successfully remove without industry-wide hashing. this is now standard but applies only to reuploads and it will always be somewhere on someone's drive. hard lesson learned. i also said this:>on the plus side, now that camming is a common industry along with onlyfans, the proliferation of this content has far less of a social stigma for distribution. and this:>social ramifications are less positive.>84061380nonsensical first portion, i am not disputing your attribution of the source image for the latter.
>>84061395add an extra > to that >84061380.>>84061393nice femoral vein on that thigh. is that sapheneous as well?
>>84061394Whatever tits
>>84061393speaking of. this is how this works. greta guugili if you want more, this is her job. she squirts too.
>>84061424no elder women would not do such things she learned that when she was younger!
>>84059845relax, 4chan is not that popular. Have better opsec, and keep it pushing. If you are being cyber bullied, log off, and take a break. Bullshit news is spat out rapidly, majority of the crowd will move on to something new. >t. got banned for posting my face with Pomni plush
>>84061474It's not about 4chan being popular, the major search engines purposely avoid certain sites these days, theres no more idiots rampantly easily linking a girls nudes to a particular social media profile. The porn must continue to flow
>>84061498learned something new. with the new knowledge, I stand by OP is possibly going through cyber bullying. The streisand effect is a thing as well. Own up to the photo and play it off, or remove yourself from the situation, takes away a lot of fun from the trolls
I was happy when someone remembered me and posted my pic, I would like to exist in some way. It's only happened a couple times since I'm a guy though
>>84061520>OP is going through bullyingHe posted this himself. He's a mentally ill loser Nigerian dude that is obsessed with getting nudes from egirls.
>>84061524>mentally ill loserNothing mentally ill about him. OP is just a buffoon fool getting a taste of his own medicine. Good. >>84059845Get #MeToo black balled, faggot. Don't kill yourself though. Do better.
>>84061465that's great, jeet. run it through google translate a few more times with more greta pics please.
>>84061523Yeah dude, internet stalkers are really fun.
>>84061523Who are you maybe I have your picture saved and can post it again
>>84061614No I can't ask that's cringe
>>84059845Making a big deal about it like this is only adding fuel to the fire.
