She hates you because youre a man btw
>>84168017nah she hates ugly men thats itshe takes dick from attractive men everyday probably and defends troons (also men)
>>84168017>nah she hates ugly men thats ither ex was a mid 5'6 guy btw
I've learned to live with it, there's nothing particularly unique about her opinion, if anything it's the standard.
>>84168017So? All women do
>>84168017No, she hates men because she's a feminist. Suffragettes and feminists were corrupted by marxists. All of the sexual liberation and womens rights, was just to destroy the world that some sluts didn't like.Women kill thousands of babies per year, for what? To take more dick? Women work longer and don't have kids. For what? They aren't happy.The happy women (truly happy) are married and have kids. The weird thing is, you don't really hear from them, it's just all the single boss bitch women screaming in mens faces I'M HAPPY
>>84168077>Suffragettes and feminists were corruptedis this the latest bait? it's pretty good since it's making me feel mildly irritated
>>84168077suffrage and feminism WERE the corruption you tard
>>84168109feminism was created by the jews
>>84168118name one jew involved with women's rights in the 19th century anglosphere
>>84168017l'd still cum in her calendar and Juno her.
>>84168017I don't mind hateful music that espouses prejudice. I can find value in it, even if I disagree with the overall message. Hell, I love me some Peste Noire, so if I didn't, I'd be a hypocrite. But just fucking own that that's what it is. Don't try to cope that this bitch's music isn't explicitly misandrist or that it's not that bad. You just make yourself look like a coping moron to anybody who has eyes.
>>84168109No.>>84168114Sorry, yes, women were corrupted by suffragettes and feminists. But also, no, because some people that joined the suffragette and feminism movements thought they were doing the right thing, so actually were corrupted.Basically, marxists, left hand path occultists, and sluts decided to ruin women and society, for shits n giggles.>>84168134NTA but, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernestine_Rose
>>84168134Ernestine Rose
>>84168017>she hates menblack men especially
>>84168157I gotta give you that one, but she wasn't present as a founder at Seneca Falls. She hopped onto the bandwagon after it was established.
>>84168151I think you vastly overestimate the influence that these people had. If women weren't naturally aligned with their message then their movement wouldn't have gone anywhere.
>>84168017She is ugly, dumb and narcissistic, I genuinely think she is inferior and I do not care about her.
>>84168172moving the goalpost is a fallacy
>>84168172cope, even other jewish feminists pointed out how many jews were in the feminist movement
>>84168077there are happy childless and childful women, and unhappy childless and childful women. THis is completely irrelevant actually, to whenever a woman is happy or not, mayhaps having like 5% difference at best (marginal). Stop with this retarded breeding propaganda. Those who want kids will have them, those that dont shouldnt.Just a simple reminder, that before modernity 90% of population seriously considered this world hell and clinged desperately unto the idea of god because of it. clearly they werent happy. Nowadays people can choose their way and therefore also choose their happiness, so there is more happy people overall although I doubt it is still above 40%
>>84168191you wanna know what I think? Jews are about to be disempowered in the west, at least compared to the power they used to wield in the past century, so this is a very convenient time for women and other groups to chalk up their sins to jewish influence and walk away with their public image intact.The problem is that nothing about women's behavior will change on the day after. They will still be the women they always were.
>>84168181I don't mean to offend you, but I think you vastly underestimate the influence these people had. Also, I believe in the good and evil thing in life, so if some people are using evil beings to help push a malevolent idea, it may spread more than it would normally. People's minds can be corrupted, and psychology is a great tool to do that. Look at Edward bernays and the consumerism boom.Be interesting to see if there's any ties to left hand people from the late 19th century, or occultists. I'm open to being called skitzo for that, doesn't bother me.
>>84168211>Just a simple reminder, that before modernity 90% of population seriously considered this world hellWould be interesting to see some stats on this, not going to lie. I'm always ok with being corrected when I'm wrong. Being truthful I'd rather be corrected if wrong.
>>84168203not really interested in the 20th century, I've said it before that jews marketed feminism, but they didn't create the movement. Jews can only work with what willing partners offer them.
>>84168231Well obviously social statistics did not exist before modernity. So we can only use indirect sources, basically just literature of the times. What people wrote about, how they thought. Average modern person thinks hell doesnt exist. But for historical folk it was real, and demons were too. Most historical art (since written language) is brutal. There werent even funny and light fairytales at all, nowadays there is a lot of them. But misery absolutely peaked as a social theme between 1850-1940, for sure. Those are all testaments to the moods that dominated society.
>>84168216>but I think you vastly underestimate the influence these people hadWhy? If your core argument had merit then it would take little to no effort to defuse feminism and just convince them to go the other way. Do you think that's a likely outcome?I think these people were a mild accelerant to something inevitable. I think the final nail in the coffin was easy access to long range communication, that's the only thing that previous iterations of "feminism" never had, that's why it could be contained before. I can't find it now, but some anti-suffragettes were actually aware of this in the 1910s, they had leaflets and posters warning people that women will destroy society if they have access to telephones because they will collectivize and network at speeds that were impossible before.
I hate her because she looks like a cabbage patch kid
>>84168277Ok. What about the period before 1850? What specifically happened during that ~150 years? >>84168302It will be a struggle to change the minds of the demented feminazis now, especially in a world where misandry is the new norm.So you're saying people knew it was bad at the time, but it was rolled out anyway, and now we have the shitshow we currently see when watching any kind of media. The generations that thought of it as bad, have all been replaced by women who fell for 4th wave feminism telling them that men and women were equals (we're not, there's things women can do that I can't, and things I can do that women can't, that's basic reality).Yes, mass communication, the invention of telephones, radio, television, all things used to push certain narratives on the world.
>>84168407>Yes, mass communication, the invention of telephones, radio, television, all things used to pushYou're not hearing me, I'm telling you that you could use the same platforms with the same intensity and it wouldn't amount to shit because women would categorically reject your message. It doesn't make them feel good the way misandry does. Hating men is a free dopamine source for women.It's not the platforms, it's not the messenger, it's women. They have the final say.
>>84168430>it's women. They have the final say.In a way, yes. They control reproduction (wasn't "controlled" before), because they are the only one's that can give birth (yes test tube babies exist). Notice the "drop in birthrates" worldwide. Came about after the 90's. In 2001 the UN published a paper about declining birthrates and how migration would be needed (look at the world and it's migrant crisis currently). It's no coincidence that came out after feminists decided that WE ARE EQUALS. No you couldn't get the same message across nowadays, because generations of minds have been corrupted in this psyop war. It's not the same mentality as 100 years. Not even the same as 50 years ago, so why try and compare it to past times? Things have moved on drastically. The same approaches won't get the same results now. It's going to take a whole new psychological approach (if there is one).
>>84168033>got dumped by thatDAMNno wonder she hates men
>>84168449>They control reproductionThat's one aspect of it and the main leverage they hold society hostage with, but ultimately I'm isolating this argument just to women's feelings.>It's no coincidence that came out after feminists decided that WE ARE EQUALS.This was never the message, the real message is describing women as the center of morality, which is how women have always felt, feminism is just a platform to voice their opinion. Feminists never considered you their equals and never wanted you to have equal rights.>No you couldn't get the same message across nowadays>psyop warDishonest. If you think you could have altered women a hundred or two hundred years ago to be different then you're just wrong. Your message just doesn't have that allure to it, it can't compete with theirs. >It's going to take a whole new psychological approach (if there is one).There isn't one, this is a one way street because most of the male population supports this as well. Patriarchal revivals won't happen in the digital age and if they do, they won't last as long as they did before because women will just instantaneously remake their networks and start breaching containment again.
>>84168486>I'm isolating this argument just to women's feelings.I'm going to have to stop reading there, sorry.Anybody's feefee's can be hurt, by any act that could be seen as innocent to another.The message of changing women 100's of years ago wasn't needed. This is something a lot of women didn't want. yet here they are. No, here we are.
>>84168522>This is something a lot of women didn't want.that doesn't make sense
>>84168525>that doesn't make senseWhat about it confuses you anon?
>>84168529If they didn't want it then they wouldn't have it. They made a movement that paints men as their main antagonist because it felt right and normal to them which means that they did actually want it.The opposite of this movement would have no following whatsoever. I think you're a simp and you're either lying or coping by going all in on Hanlon's razor. Please refer to:>>84168215
>>84168017>get a load of this fat ugly hag spouting stupid bullshitkek. this irrelevant piece of meat will never amount to anything and this fundamental truth should make everybody happy. The underlying reality is: she has no and never will have an influence on the world and the processes in it.It is very important to understand fully at all times, whenever any person with "opinions" is mentioned anywhere, in life.I would recommend the appraoch of not giving a single shit about people beyond you figurative, not literal, event horizon.TL;DR: I'm playing video games and the life is great.
>>84168542>If they didn't want it then they wouldn't have it.How many laws and things are passed nowadays that people don't want?
>>84168564Not a lot of laws were passed in a long time that women don't like and those that did were met with fierce resistance and outrage on their end.
>>84168017I don't care. I don't pay attention to random pop singer whores.
>>84168573I'm talking about anybody not wanting them. The whole point of "if somebody didn't want something to happen it wouldn't" applies to things not just concerning men and women and divide and conquer tactics.
>>84168017I don't give a shit, I have never heard her songs nor care about that ugly hag anyway. She's not even hot so who cares.
>>84168590>I'm talking about anybody not wanting them.How does that fit into this argument? We're talking about women and no such thing has happened to them in a long time. Men eat shit all the time and accept anything and in fact support the preferential treatment of women.
>>84168597Men want pussy. That's why SIMPs exist.And something has happened to women, the boss baddie movement, women doing onlyfans, whoring themselves out, being fooled into believing they are more valuable than they are (goes for men and women at times).We're talking about psychological manipulation, so using other examples of it is relevant.
>>84168017I'm insulted that someone brought this here thinking we would care about Sabrina Carpenter. Please go back to the E! comment section or wherever you came from.
>>84168025Having an itch to scratch doesn't mean she doesn't hate men. She obviously hates men, her music videos constantly express this. https://x.com/OOCprogresismo2/status/2031717183475089483?s=20Why do guys always lie to themselves about the fact women genuinely want them dead and now one of the most popular up and raising stars expresses exactly this desire? This reminds me of the "it's not happening. ok it is but it's not a big deal. Ok, it's a big deal but here's why it's a good thing. Well that happened, anyway, moving on." i hope you guys know it's only gonna get worse. As it has been since women got the right to vote.
>>84168607>being fooledThis is insufferable, you people are either completely lost or sadistic on purpose.
>>84168643>Why do guys always lie to themselves about the fact women genuinely want them deadNTA but, pussy, then the chance of love and a family.
>>84168118Does it matter when it resonates so strongly with non-jews.
>>84168659>being fooledYes, that is what I believe. Sorry that upsets you. I'm not sadistic, so you'd class me as lost. But know, I think similar of you.It's not too late for either of us, amarite.I'll be honest, I'm now high, so suspect you may become more irritated by me, so for that reason, I'll leave (it's not because I'm loading up some vidya to play).
>>84168678Feminism wasn't created by jews, they've marketed it later on. Don't accept this lie because it fundamentally changes the argument and women are pushing it on purpose to paint themselves as victims of subversion.
>>84168741You guys are cracked and have lost all touch with reality
>>84168747kill yourself you lying simp cockroach
>>84168017So this is the chick that every alt right guy hates?
>>84168017Why do simps defend this chopped oompa loompa looking ass bitch who hates them?
i dont understand the hate. shes a generic pop star. her music is bland and boring. her sexual shit is a forced act and she is clearly larping. shes a boring starfish in bed for chad shes not some promiscious bimbo she portrays herself as.but the bottom line: the music is very bland
>>84169635Where's the bland male pop star who makes bland lame videos of killing boring women? If there was one, how would the public take it?
>>84168017She looks cheap and easy
>>84168017Sabrina Carpenter is hot. Idgaf man. Real talk she fine as fuck
>>84168643I can't take someone's "hate" seriously if they regularly allow themselves to submissively take the cock of the subject of their hate and thoroughly enjoy it every time. This like how women go around saying they hate rapists and want them to die but have shit like "How I cheated on my boyfriend with my rapist to empower me" or something retarded like that.
>>84169730women are retarded children and are treated as such. a man doing that is actually seen as threatening since men arent just walking vaginas that get emotional and period craps every 2 weeks. theres a difference between man and woman and you cant pick and choose when you want to believe that. but my point is, shes a low iq garbage pop star and not worth discussing. her shallow marketing gimmicks are not worth getting mad about. shes got a double digit iq and has jewish handlers.
>>84168017I just wanna take a needle tl her disgusting balloon lips
>>84169792>Women are children >and she's not worth discussingYou realise she's being used to propagandize millions of little impressionable foidletts right? https://youtu.be/3PssTexP8WE?si=1tntF2NQVhc5tlIz
white women are like bad kids, they test the limits. always do more degenerate and depraved things, more bratty shittalk, more acting out just to see if theres a limit with white men. and so far there is no limit, white men wont react to anything. is it any wonder white women are so trash and slutty these days? imagine raising a kid but you never tell him no, and he can do anything he wants and say anything. any kid raised like that would be an asshole
>>84168017I wish I had a cock so I could fuck her tiny pussy relentlessly
>>84169909Shouldn't have cut it off then. Bet you feel stupid now./blah blah blah not original.
>>84169925Unfortunately my daddys spermatozoid had an X instead of a Y chromosome :(
>>84169935giwtwmwhy do we get to be so unlucky? :(
>>84168017How come women have dreadful role models?
>>84169958Im not a tranny but god I wish I had a cock to rape hot chicks with
Foids have no personality besides hating men. A whole gender of pathetic losers.
>>84169882you're mistaken about it. we have a systematic approach, that is the substition for war in the first world. And the huge management systems are extremely slow, such as the government. Point here being, females will lose their "rights".
>>84168025Kys simp freak loser.
>>84168017She's genuinely the only white celebrity I've been attracted to in years. What's wrong with me?
>>84170064Holy fuck how short is this bitch? Does she crack 5 feet?
>>84170064shes a gross looking midget with a drag queen aesthetic
>>84170064She looks like a midget housewife in her mid 30s. Which might sound good at first until you look at her drawn on face. lol
she doesn't hate men, you guys are illiterate and believe anything
>>84168407Industrial revolution happened. Its not like thing were much better before that, it just wasnt so overwhelming seeping from all holes, but most art (which includes obviously literature, paintings, diaries, theatre et cetera) still had negative connotations about the world. There are some exceptions, for example ancient egypt and greece, and mayhaps 12.-14. centuries europe, had some flashes of positivity just like we have now, but on the grand scale those are rare times.
>>84168017>>84170064>tfw no misogynist gf I can fuck the man-hatred out of
>>84168017bwahahahahaaa hahaha, ahahahahahahahaaa, oh no, ahahaha
>>84168017What an ugly spiteful incel chud bitch.
>>84168017She looks like the women you'd see on the streets after midnight.
>>84170175>Industrial revolution happenedPeople sent out to work harsh long days for factory owners. Squalid living conditions. Smaller machinery needing small nimble hands to be able to operate.
It's not fair bros... She's so perfect.
>>84168017She doesn't really think anything. She's just reading a script written by jews.
>>84170512>>84170286>>84170064It's honestly disrespectful of them to do this while Dolly Parton's still alive. She's such a tryhard.
Manchild isn't even a good song she just hit the right word at the right time lol. Lucky girl
>>84171139I disagree I think its a very catchy song but I hate the content. If I resist my chud tendencies I can enjoy the music for what it is.
>>84169866>You realise she's being used to propagandize millions of little impressionable foidletts right?Good. Fuck all the tradcuck LARPers who said genalpha would have some kind of a spiritual revival.You're not a real misogynist if you don't support this.
