IQ differences between adult males and females. Adult males have a 3-5 IQ point advantage over adult females. Males also occupy the vast majority of those >130 IQ.
>>84171570last iq test I did I scored 79
>>84171570Foid and 152 multi-tested IQ What good it did me lol
>>84172270Bet youre either a schizo shut-in or must have crazy standards for menOr both
>>84172270manipulate me with your high iq and make me your bf
>>84172296Yeah bretty much lol
>iwn be a +3 standard deviation foidwhy even live
>>84172313Fucking kek. Typical. The only women that actually try to date others in this day and age are insane midwit bpd cunts
>>84171570uh oh he's posted the forgotten graph. we already have people seething about the one where it only compares standard deviation but shifts them to the same mean.
>>84172316The alienation must be insane. I'm only +2 SD guy and even I have serious issues meeting other guys who I don't have to actively code switch for like I was talking to a literal retard. I've had one(1) friend in my life that I could call my intellectual peer. +3 SD foid will most likely go through her whole life without meeting another woman that she could connect with and form a meaningful friendship. Atleast she has a slim chance of meeting a guy with similar cognitive capability and hopefully make gigabrain kids.
>>84172270Took one of those feminist iq tests, eh. Kek.
>>84172440i just wish i were a womanhaving high iq would probably just be an upside since i'm already isolated
>>84172440>Atleast she has a slim chance of meeting a guy with similar cognitive capability and hopefully make gigabrain kids.I wonder how high her standards are. If 5/10 women all want men who are 6', 6 figures, etc. then one who knows she's measurably in the top percentile in intellect must have absolutely absurd standards, like 8' tall quadrillionaire illuminati werepire shit.
>>84172440Replying to myself as I thought about this meaningful connection regarding cognitive capability. What many people think of intelligence is "grasp things quickly", which is partially true but that's not the obstacle, the real issue is differences in qualitative thinking. I've found that no amount of explaining will make a person two standard deviations lower than me understand my point. If I was a professional educator I could perhaps do that, but assuming a role of a teacher and coaching your friend or spouse through understanding your everyday idle thoughts is just massive undertaking.My gf hasn't taken any test but I'd estimate her to be +1SD. She is by far the most intelligent of my partners I've had, but even she needs to be walked through some idle thought I happened to share, and she still tends to dumb it down for herself and lose nuance.I would honestly say that more than one standard deviation is just too much of a gap to bridge if you want a meaningful relationship, be it friendship or romantic. People with markedly lesser cognitive capability also tend to see you as cold or detached when you aren't a screeching retard who reacts by your lizard brain. People who value calm, mature and intellectual dissertation of issues are rare in my experience, and it's hard to build a relationship with a person who needs irrational conflict to feel there's love. And it's incredibly painful to plainly see dysfunctional behavioural patterns of people around but you can't really point them out because you're seen as a dick even when your only motive to help them.Honestly if I had someone in my life that was +2SD above me, I'd fucking beg them to give their thoughts about my EVERYTHING, dumbed down for me if possible. But I have the perspective of being that for normies, which normies lack. Trying to explain to them that it's like them telling to mildly retarded downie that masturbating in public isn't kosher wouldn't go well, I assume :D
Keep coping, men are now 100% obsolete.
>>84171570If I take estrogen will that make me dumber?
>>84172313>>84172323it's nothing more than natural selection
>>84172703I donate eggs so
>>84172689yeah, gender studies are useful>>84171570looks about right, most women are basically the same. they like the same stuff, behave the same way, make the same mistakes...
>>84172694I wish it did. Intellect without academic success is hell. My socioeconomic status is shit and by extension my potential social circles consist of absolute retards.
>>84171570Isn't that pretty much nothing? There's only significant difference when you're one standard deviation above someone
>>84172819>yeah, gender studies are usefulOh I wish it was gender studies where women go. Over here you get more points on applying to uni if you apply to a field where your gender is the minority. So women get easier into STEM while guys respectively get easier into gender studies. Great trade, isn't it? Surprisingly not a lot of guys have found their way in there, must be the toxic masculinity.
>>84172886>So women get easier into STEM while guys respectively get easier into gender studiesyou're addressing the wrong point. the problem is, gender studies as a study field wasn't as big as it is now. many places saw it as an opportunity to get money from oblivious, naive women who thought degrees like these would land them a job. there are several cases like these. same with human resources, marketing... anyone can get a degree now.
>>84172689Men go to college for STEM to develop new technology and medicine, women go to college for women's studies degrees
