[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_4686.jpg (1.53 MB, 1170x1707)
1.53 MB
1.53 MB JPG
Why do mega corporations add look so boring? You have billions of dollars would it hurt if your actually attempted to make your brand look aesthetic by making beautiful art then putting your name on it?
>>
>>84173233
they want to appeal to as wide an audience as possible
>>
>>84173238
Micro ads?
>>
>>84173233
That add in your pic actually look pretty interesting
>>
>>84173233
Because efficiency is prioritized over a higher purpose, you want to make sure the public instinctively picks up on and remembers your minimalist logos rather than creating personal touches that no one cares about or will even notice
>>
>>84173233
They didn't become billion dollar companies by wasting money on things like looks or aesthetics, they made them by cutting as many corners as possible, as closely as possible.
>>
File: 1753861328803068.jpg (1.84 MB, 3074x4295)
1.84 MB
1.84 MB JPG
Reminds me of this one. Don't you think so?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.