This question is coming from an antinatalist by the way. We're all just going to hold hands, sing kumbaya, and pretend women's liberation is good until our society is overrun or completely collapses on itself from the weight of its own hubris?
Wars aren't actually required. This whole idea is false.
>>84177313>So, women are just going to kill society, and people are okay with that?It's not that they're okay with it, it's just that nothing can be done.
>>84177313Why would a country want women on their frontlines? That's economically and militarily stupid, The orange pfp redditor's angle and focus seems to be all about tit for tat "fairness", how about not doing it cause its retarded? Ever thought of that, you stupid asswipe?
>>84177745If they can vote they can be on the frontline
>>84177313Yeah, that's what Rome did
>>84177760Again, if you want women on the frontline just cause you see that as some exchange, you are a shit for brain
>>84177745>>84178157The first argument is also retarded. We don't need anybody on the frontlines anymore because we have nukes. But you wouldn't think that's "ethical" despite being unable to define or point to ethics.
>>84178157Again, if you want rights you can accept responsibility
>>84178195Again, you are a shit for brain retard. Women on the frontlines is retarded.
>>84178209>ignoring my post about nukesYou're retarded. Bombs and nukes are the way. They will prevent any loss of life.
finally men are waking up. if you fight for a capitalist european country youre not fighting for "your people" (btw the elites and roasties say our people dont even exist, its all just the human race), you are fighting for the ruling class. and we shouldnt fight for them>but thats economic suicide!!nah, men can consoom mr shekelbergs movies and muhammad's kebabs just as well as women can
>>84177745Huh it's almost like we're not actually equal and that it's all a show and immediately goes out the window the instant hit really shits the fan and the draft officer comes knocking. If you're a Western man and you support female rights after seeing what happened in Ukraine with their men being nabbed to the frontlines while their women get 1st class tickets to Sweden and the US you're a fucking tool btw
>>84177341>s not that they're okay with it, it's just that nothing can be doneReworking of women's rights?You just need an executive order fit that.l
>>84178237>You just need an executive orderJust the one? Should be pretty simple, send a letter to your congressman and start a correspondence.
>>84177745Dumbfuck, if they can make it through basic they are more fit than the average lazy retard american male by definition, you're acting like they'd just take them directly from their hen house and drop them in the middle of a combat zone the next day fucking retard watching too many hollyjew movies
>>84177313>We're all just going to hold hands, sing kumbayaWhat the fuck are you talking about. You've got a president's daughter to save
>>84177313Yes. We're all killing ourselves out of pure cuckery and desire to get laid. Ironic, isn't it? We do things to get laid, only to kill ourselves as a result. It's very poetic in a way.
You guys don't understand women. They don't want to be conscripted for war. They understand that men and women have different roles. Just like men do war while being dragged kicking and screaming, you must drag women to their role with them kicking and screaming. They are begging to be put in their place but they're too shy to ask to be raped so they're doing everything they can to force you to do so.Including making you hate them.They are LITERALLY asking for it (indirectly in true woman way)
>men fightMaybe men should stop being so retarded then. Women are wise cutting out the overpopulated world a bit in a more sensible way.
>>84178612The problem with that is that raping them would result in other men arresting you. And the women will kill your unborn child. So it doesn't work, your whole premise is retarded.
>>84178209If they shouldn't be on the front line then why should they be able to vote? They are both physically and mentally inferior.
>>84177313>We're all just going to hold hands, sing kumbaya, and pretend women's liberation is good until our society is overrun or completely collapses on itself from the weight of its own hubris?Well, yes. And no. Because it's not going to be kumbaya and there's pretty much nothing anyone can do about it anymore. People think it's going to be all kumbaya. By the time people realize that it won't be kumbaya, it'll be too late, and then it won't matter at all what anyone thinks. It's going to go down.
>>84177313I didn't think we should ever have involuntary conscription because that's slavery. >women should be conscripted too because men areNeither should be, wanting women to get conscripted too is crab in the bucket resentment>muh traditional roles Don't care, if traditional roles were indeed natural you don't need to force them. Muh tradition is just a spook they use to manipulate you.
>>84178625>Women are wise cutting out the overpopulated world a bit in a more sensible way.The world is not overpopulated retard. Asia is overpopulated in some regions is the best argument you could make.
>>84178625>Women are wise cutting out the overpopulated world a bitYou KNOW which areas are really overpopulated and you KNOW haven't stopped breeding. You disingenuous faggots should be hanged.
