What the fuck are excess males/surplus males?Women are 50.1% of the population, so that would mean women have the surplus and not men
>>84262800you're forgetting that women will pair up and enter harams for chad. so a chad can get a rotation of 5 - 7 girls.that 4- 6 dudes not getting a girl. now scale that for population and yeah you have millions of men alone ready to join fascism or communism or whatever the fuck else radical ideologies are trendy right now.
>>84262800Gynocentric societyWe need to be more like china where they check for hymens
>>84262800Its basically that historically only 40% of males reproduced and 80% of females reproduced but this excess male theory is incredibly retarded in any first world country in the 21st century because the reason only 40% reproduced was cause men used to just rape women like thousands of years ago and thats just socially not a thing and add to the fact that majority of men only have kids with one woman these days too instead of like having 4-5 different babymamas its just not a thing anymore
>>84262800well they imported tens of millions of men into europe so thats no longer true here. honestly if i had the money i'd move into one of these shithole countries the refugees come from and bang the excess foids who live there
>>84262873Where are you getting that from?Like that wouldn't be true in all civilizations during all times.Like the Mongols under Genghis Khan had a different perception of women then the Ancient Greeks in Athens, or the Indus Valley Civilization
>>84262800Any women talking about excess males who isn't married with children before 25 should be ignoredThey're genetic failures coping with their uselessness
>>84262873>Its basically that historically only 40% of males reproduced and 80% of females reproducedbullshit that ignores time periods and compounding variables
They're all here. I never stood a chance.
Most women are OLD.Women live A LOT LONGER.In some countries they live 10-20 YEARS LONGER ON AVERAGE.SO THEY ARE OLD.
>>84263321So everything would be solved if guys started dating women who were older
>>84263330YES.But men naturally gravitate towards YOUNGER more IMPRESSIONABLE and FITTER women.Not pedophilia like in the RSA (retarded states of america), but wanting a YOUNGER WOMEN is preferable. So there are MORE men competing for LESS women, while there are LESS men competing for the BIGGER POOL of women.
>>84263363Which is why it is the most difficult for men to date in their 20s when women are most pursued by men of all ages, and it gets easier from that point on
>>84263363Thomas? Is that you?
>>84263363You are RETARDEDS and also GAYKill YOURSELF
>>84262800Your own image says women are 50.8% of the population not 50.1%
>>84262800>assumed monogamy
>>84263652I don't know any guys with 2 or 3 GFsDo you?
>>84262800Young people (where dating happens) => male surplusElderly people => female surplusWomen don't get prostate cancer, they suffer less from heart disease, they do less risky behavior, they're more likely to see doctors when they feel like they're dying, etc.So, no, women don't form harems to compensate for there being excess females. Men don't either, actually. Monogamy is the overwhelming norm. Even in studies that put the rate at 4-5%, it's vastly shifted because gay/bi couples engage with it way more, and the sampling bias is always in the direction of young urban progressives with these online surveys even for straight couples.
>>84263276>genetic failureHow do you still not get it? Women would actually rather work in retail than have children nowadays. Women have endless opportunities to never fail. They're not failing. They just don't want what you assume they do.
>>84263777I've worked in a seniors homeDating happens among the elderly, trust me
>>84263872The relevant kind to any 4channer is when you're young, but thanks for the nitpick.
>>84262800Of those 151.8 million men, approximately 151,799,999 of them are unfuckable losers. That's the excess.
>>84262873If rape was more common in the past why wouldn't 100% of men have reproduced?
>>84262800>Women are 50.1% of the population, so that would mean women have the surplus and not menthis is irrelevantwomen will prefer being single moms from a chad dad than being married to a non-chad.surplus males are the non-chads.
>>84264177What about the kids?Would they rather have a mommy and daddy or just a single mom?
>>84264208When has a woman ever thought about anyone but herself?
>>84263841No, they're quite literally genetic failures.
>>84264240That's great but literally no one outside of /r9k/ cares about that. They're laughing at us, not with us.
>>8426280060 year olds and older skew heavily female which flubs the numbers. Also, all young women are whores and share Chad. It never works out where 1 man partners up with 1 woman.
>>84264240They still have decades to have children. Nobody believes in the ideal of having 12 children before you're 30 in the west except Hasidic Jews. Also, why does being a "genetic failure" matter?
>>84264287>decades>s>pluralA 22 year old girl has maybe 8 years left, if she's even fertile anymore at all due to the past 4+ years of birth control addiction and/or abortions.
>>84264335You can use IVF post-45/pre-menopause. Obviously fertility peaks earlier, but ~50% of live births in the US are between 30 and 40. Idk why /pol/tards pretend women have to be their slaves to be happy.
>>84262800Operational sex ratio: ~12 males for 1 femalehttps://praxonian.substack.com/p/there-are-117-men-for-each-woman
>>84264737That's not trueMen are 49.2% of the population, and women are 50.8% of the population
Men die younger than women. Men from age 12-120 only want premenopausal women, preferably under 30, ideally under 20.Thats a lot of men competing for a very small pool of women. You'd think since we have marriage that many would pair up, but women initiate ~87% of divorces right as they're about to expire smv-wise. She takes the bigger half of everything he owns and rides off into the sunset to find prince charming, she married only to divorce/get resources and honestly thinks she can tie Chad down now. These freshly divorced men are bitter and angry after being abused, betrayed, and then robbed. Ironically enough this makes them more attractive, women don't just want to make men unhappy, they have strong preferences for already unhappy men. And even with just the smaller half of everything a lot of divorce survivors still have more resources than men in the age cohort he is interested in. Since women only marry with intentions of betraying-robbing and then go after what they really want the men who failed to learn their lesson get a second or even third ex.In my state eight years is the magic number. I don't know if it's official laws or what, but divorce lawyers suggest women to get married and wait that long. That's the point where they can consistently ensure she gets the bigger half of everything he owns.Women bad aside, the divorce industry is highly lucrative, almost as much as the drug prohibition industry. It's the Satanic trifecta; petrodollar, military industrial complex's war on drugs, and family court. These act as the bedrock foundation of our economy. Smoke and mirrors, an engine powered by human suffering. America rejected God to worship Mammon. Mammon did not offer enough in return, so they put mammon in the backseat to worship Moloch.It actually gets even worse, there's no flesh and blood to be found when doing a root cause analysis. The monsters who bear the star of Repham on their standard worship Baal and they control the world.
>>84263872Thats not dating, it's just hookup culture. They can't have kids and anyone in a nursing home is so negative in value that even their own kin hate them to the point they put them in granny/grandpa jail. If they weren't bad people their family would take care of them. If their children are bad people you must keep in mind where they got their genetic material from and who taught them morality and their formative experiences.I'm not even talking about the ones on a memory ward. Just the ones in minimum security. Overweight and obesity tell you almost everything you need to know about a person's morality and worth as a human being. Most in care centers are overweight/obese. These aren't the sweet 80 year olds who go birdwatching in the morning, tend their garden in the afternoon, and then prepare a huge feast for family of twenty+ people in the evening using ingredients they grew, raised, got from a local farmer they went to school with, hunted, or fished themselves. Many times they aren't even that old or disabled. Lots of people in old folk homes are 50 and 60. You can still be perfectly functional for another decade or four after that. Their problems are moral, not senescent.
In the age brackets that matter, there are far more young males than young women.
