>modern women's exceedingly high average standards is a net POSITIVE on society because it will select for GOOD GENES!Then why are "bad gene" women still encouraged to reproduce? It seems like this argument isn't based on any hardline moral principles and instead attempts to justify women's interests.
>>84284541I think this argument has always been retarded, because nature filtered us for an extremely long time. The only thing that has made us weak is artificial society, and its poisons that accompany it. Strictly speaking: most of us were strong enough to survive naturally, therefore most of us deserve the right to procreate.It's crazy that I'm the end of my line and I know it's the end of my line, too.
>>84284541Most of the traits within men which women find unattractive are from the mother.If a 5'2 woman gets paired with a 6'0 man, their son will be dragged down by her genetics by the standards women hold men to today. Not to mention how the median IQ women are attracted to is 75.
>>84284541only males have bad genes, like the Y gene
>>84284585Men and women share all of the autosomes and the X chromosome, which is 98% of them. A 3/10 woman will produce 3/10 progeny on average.
>humans as a species are dependent on intelligence for success>with creation of society women will just have sex with chad even if hes retardednot looking too good
>>84284748>with creation of societyWith perversion of society. Until 20th century European working people society was majorly meritocratic, promoted intelligence and following of social norms.
the assumption women always make the best most perfect choice is hilarious and thats what underlines this whole thing. theyre a bunch of broke single women with a baby daddy lol. enjoy your future whore or future criminal child
>>84284759Women end up in these patterns of abuse because these patterns produce the most whorish daughters (most likely to get knocked up) and the most violent criminal sons (most likely to reproduce)
>>84284541>modern women's exceedingly high average standards is a net POSITIVE on society because it will select for GOOD GENES!low iq men are more likely to reproduce than high iq men
>>84284541Because bad genes are passed on through the mother, retardIn that case, only chads and stacies should not be neutered at birth
>>84284784b-bb-b--but they're getting better looking and taller
>>84284784its one of the reasons i think birth control and the current low birth rate is great. if youve ever watched documentaries on serial killers youd know almost all of them either had an extremely violent father and/or an insane bpd mother. the way women act today is pure insane bpd behavior and if they had kids there would probably be a huge increase in crazy serial killers in 20 years. thank god for birth control
>>84284816It's mainly low IQ people that are reproducing now, at least in most developed countries
>>84284569Donate sperm then.
>>84284791THIS. I'm a Becky and the clinics in Los Angeles refused to voluntarily sterilize me, because I am South Korean.
>>84284954Socialism was a mistake.If you cant feed and teach your kids so be it. This is European traditional civilization way that made greatest achievements ever.
>>84284541Even if this argument were true (and it isn't) it would still fall apart because women aren't having children.So the "superior gene selection" myth completely falls apart. Any woman saying "but chad won't stay and help me raise his bastard", that disproves the entire "female selection" argument. Even with full state enforcement and welfare programs they don't have kids. Engaging in sex acts that can accidentally cause pregnancy shows they aren't seeking genes for reproduction.I'm pretty sure we've him rat utopia and are in full behavioral sink
