>>84289228
This is so unnerving stop that shit
>yes I know im not interesting enough to warrant this

I've became obsessed with anons on here to a lesser extent than this doe. I mean there's no harm in it so it's not that weird. Do you want to talk about some of the anons you like? Share some of your collection will u?

File: 1745719467198.png (155 KB, 517x511)

155 KB PNG

>daily "hey does anyone else recognize people that are deliberately trying to be recognized" thread

>>84289247
Archivers are different, they archive and generally make it public eventually while I will never make these public, that would feel like an invasion of privacy.

>>84289249
I'm not posting it or showing it to other people or anything like that.

>>84289252
For me this is a private activity, but I'm just wondering if I'm the only one doing things like this, it would feel wrong to talk about robots behind their back, or to put all their posts out there and almost de-anonymize them.

>>84289253
I don't catalogue the posts of people with names, or people that make posts with the same pictures over and over, I find no fun in that. I go by the content of their posts, believe it or not, but some people can be recognized by their posting patterns. Almost makes me feel like a detective. Sometimes you find an aberration in their posting style or pattern and you have to try decide whether it was a mistake on their part, or if their style of posting is changing. I worry that I've missed posts or have discounted posts due to an error on their part, or if they posted slightly differently than usual, or anything.

>>84289269
How are you sure it's even the same anons though?

>>84289275
Certain robots post in certain ways. They're more likely to use the same words, post at certain times, post about certain things. I could be wrong, but I truly do not think I am wrong. After following certain robots for a while, I can pick their posts out quite easily.

But at the end of the day, I could be wrong. But I am very certain that the robots I do follow, that I am not.

>>84289269
>but some people can be recognized by their posting patterns
i have like 6 different typing styles depending on my mood and the tone i'm going for

>>84289293
For all I know, I could be tracking the same robot twice, but they're posting about different things, in different ways.

That doesn't really matter to me, I don't have the aim of finding every single thing a robot has ever posted about on /r9k/, it's more about the personality in the posts that I like so much. I sometimes go back and read their posts again I liked them so much.

>>84289290
you are very wrong

>>84289228
>Is anyone else infatuated with certain robots?
are you fr? kek. get a hobby, man.
>>84289269
>For me this is a private activity, but I'm just wondering if I'm the only one doing things like this
yes. you have way too much free time on your hands. don't you think about this as wasting your life for no reason?
>Am I weird for doing this?
this is mental
>Should I stop?
if you like that particular robot so much you can try talking to him, you know
>but it's just... fun. It's my collection.
how the fuck is this fun? lmao. There are so much data you can be working on or so much things you could create, why would you ever choose this particular activity?
>>84289290
>I could be wrong, but I truly do not think I am wrong.
Yes. People post in vastly different styles, depending. Also people LARP.
Not sure whether this thread is a larp though, because you never know with obsessive people.

>>84289309
I am incredibly certain that I am correct. I didn't begin this thread to argue about whether I can recognize anonymous posts or not, because I know that I can.

>>84289315
That's creepy. Stop being you

>>84289315
glowing hands have typed this post. that's the only explanation.

>>84289311
Seems like it but who cares? Probably just salty about something and being a bpd about it.

>>84289315
nobody is autistic enough to keep track of me, not even myself

>>84289311
>are you fr? kek. get a hobby, man.
Yes, I am "for real".

>yes. you have way too much free time on your hands. don't you think about this as wasting your life for no reason?
I only spend about 1-2 hours a day quickly reviewing the archives and saving posts, I don't think I'm wasting my life at all, this is just a fun side activity.

>if you like that particular robot so much you can try talking to him, you know
That would feel wrong, I don't want to interfere with their posts, or have them post in a different way. I think I feel the same way people that observe animals in nature feel. To interfere could possibly change their actions, I like to see natural, authentic posts.

>how the fuck is this fun? lmao. There are so much data you can be working on or so much things you could create, why would you ever choose this particular activity?
For me, I just enjoy certain posters. I like the things they post, how they post. I can't really describe it. It just makes me happy.

>Yes. People post in vastly different styles, depending. Also people LARP.
>Not sure whether this thread is a larp though, because you never know with obsessive people.
I understand this, but I am not trying to catalogue every post by certain robots, only the posts that I recognize.

>>84289324
Why? I'm not doing anything strange, I'm just reading posts that I like over and over, I like to save the posts that I enjoy, the same way someone might buy a movie they liked after seeing it at a cinema.

>>84289331
I only catalogue the posts that I like by certain robots, I'm not making a collection of every single person to ever post on /r9k/.

I feel like some people misunderstand my intentions in this thread.

>>84289335
>To interfere could possibly change their actions, I like to see natural, authentic posts.
Don't you think this bred might change the way people post for a while? Perhaps you're fucking with them for lulz, because some people will get anxious because of this thread, that's a possibility.
> I can't really describe it. It just makes me happy.
screenshot it? faster and easier. I might be mistaken, but you don't seem to be one of the data collection anons from /g/
>I only catalogue the posts that I like by certain robots, I'm not making a collection of every single person to ever post on /r9k/.
again, screenshot the post you like and be done with it?

>>84289349
>Don't you think this bred might change the way people post for a while? Perhaps you're fucking with them for lulz, because some people will get anxious because of this thread, that's a possibility.
Even if it does, that's okay. Honestly, this may even help me. I may see robots I like posting about things they generally don't post about, or posting about the same things but in a slightly different manner, this could help my profile of certain robots.

>screenshot it? faster and easier. I might be mistaken, but you don't seem to be one of the data collection anons from /g/
I'm definitely not just trying to collect data, I am just cataloguing posts I enjoy by robots that I can recognize.

I wouldn't screenshot posts because I like seeing how these robots interact with other robots, they generally interact in the same manner, but I guess sometimes they're in a particularly good or bad mood and can act out of character, it's fun to imagine what may have changed their mood.

>>84289228
I don't keep posts but I give anons names and write notes about them

>>84289363
>but I guess sometimes they're in a particularly good or bad mood and can act out of character, it's fun to imagine what may have changed their mood.
yes, this is it. My style of posting changes drastically.
>I may see robots I like posting about things they generally don't post about, or posting about the same things but in a slightly different manner
this board has the same exact threads, more or less, just worded in a slightly different way...
>>84289364
ah, the co-worker has entered the chat. nice.

>>84289290
>certain times
literally me the other day wanting to post on my usual time and then feeling scared that person would know it was me

>>84289380
>this board has the same exact threads, more or less, just worded in a slightly different way...
This is one of the reasons it can be so easy to recognize certain posters.

>>84289386
Don't be scared! I'm just observing, I have no grand plan. It's just because I enjoy the posts of certain robots.

>>84289395
>This is one of the reasons it can be so easy to recognize certain posters.
Well, you've certainly made me think about not sharing anything real on this board anymore.

I am 100% certain you are delusional and just collecting random posts, making up stories about these alleged individuals and choosing to believe it for no reason, unless you're talking about the retard fags who make the same kinda posts every two days over and over

>>84289395
not scared of you
scared of a particular person
who likes to observe patterns
and stalk me.
i wont stop posting...
its just funny how it keeps happening.

>>84289407
Why, in case someone reads your posts, enjoys it, then continues to enjoy it again later? Your posts will live on even longer than the thread will, even after the thread has been bumped off the board, your post will still be bringing enjoyment to someone. What's wrong with that?

>>84289410
I am 100% certain I have not.

>>84289228
Another student of the Arts...

>>84289423
Someone is stalking you by your /r9k/ posts? Do they bother you about them? Are you posting something they strongly disagree with and they're harassing you? I don't understand

>>84289410
>I am 100% certain you are delusional and just collecting random posts,
nta. the room for error is not out of the question.
>making up stories about these alleged individuals and choosing to believe it for no reason
some posts are recognizable. it depends on what the person is talking about. this board can randomly identify quite a few of avatar/namefags even without their names/avatars.
Despite having different styles of posting, I'd assume, that plenty of my posts are quite identifiable too, but it doesn't bother me.

>>84289434
i think they secretly hate me, but they pretend to be my friend

>>84289426
>Why, in case someone reads your posts, enjoys it, then continues to enjoy it again later?
Not all people have good intentions. You might be merely enjoying the posting style, much like people enjoy certain captions on images, but you're not the only actor who might be collecting posts/data. Nothing personnel.
>What's wrong with that?
Not much by itself. Just a good daily reminder that the internet is not anonymous anyway. People might regret some of the things they have posted before.

>>84289447
That sounds odd, I'm not sure why someone would do that.

>>84289451
>Not much by itself. Just a good daily reminder that the internet is not anonymous anyway. People might regret some of the things they have posted before.
The posters are still anonymous even if I recognize their posts. I'm not trying to find who these people really are.

I'd love to make an AI model based off of the posts I have that I am 100% certain are by a single robot, then parse the /r9k/ archive through it and see how many posts I have missed, but that isn't something I plan on doing, it could just be a fun activity.

>>84289228
How do you know it is the same robot?

I sometimes find myself writing inane rants here. Do you recognize me?

>>84289228
GIWpeople would pay more attention to writing styles and post composition.
I was arguing with an anon and another replied and despite the post not sounding like what I would have replied with... it was mistaken as me.
I got very unnerved, how could you not tell? THAT'S NOT ME. I immediately ghosted and hid the thread

>>84289465
>I'd love to make an AI model based off of the posts I have that I am 100% certain are by a single robot
is it a coomer thing? In so far, that one could also talk to the model trained on posts. Provided they have some emotion and arousing stuff in their posts, which usually isn't the case. This board isn't famous for literotica.
>but that isn't something I plan on doing, it could just be a fun activity.
typical local freeware LLMs aren't good enough to identify the posting style without making mistakes.

>>84289470
Basically, I build a profile of how they generally post. Times they post at, words they're more likely to use, topics they post about, etc.

Do I recognize you? Well I can't say based off of this post. This post is very vague and there isn't much to it. There are many little posts like these without much substance to them, from robots I do catalogue certain posts of, that I would miss. Like I have said, I am not trying to find every post certain robots have ever made, just the posts I do like from certain robots.

>>84289228
You're infatuated yet you don't reach out to them, why?

>>84289473
I don't understand this either. I've seen it happen a few times, I guess there's just some silly people about.

>>84289474
>is it a coomer thing? In so far, that one could also talk to the model trained on posts. Provided they have some emotion and arousing stuff in their posts, which usually isn't the case. This board isn't famous for literotica.
Not necessarily, people do use it for perverse purposes, but AI and LLM doesn't need to be used in that way.

>typical local freeware LLMs aren't good enough to identify the posting style without making mistakes.
This is another reason I haven't really cared to try or even look into this, more of a pipe dream I guess.

>>84289485
I wouldn't have any reason to reach out. I'm not sure if I would enjoy speaking to the people behind the posts, as others in this thread have said, they post with personas or in different ways sometimes. I could find one of these posters as they are posting, try contact them in some way for seemingly no reason, and then just... talk to them?

It's not about the person behind the posts, it's about the posts themselves, what they represent, what they convey, what that person was thinking at that moment in time, in that situation.

I like the posts, I do not know a single thing about the robot behind the post, and I kind of like it that way. If someone was infatuated with your posts and had catalogued them, would you want them to reach out to you?

Also in my OP, it may have been a mistake to say I am infatuated with certain robots. More infatuated with certain posts from certain robots.

>>84289501
Do you enjoy being creepy?

>>84289517
How am I being creepy? I'm just reading posts certain robots have made again. I'm not doing anything strange with these posts.

File: 1775240105081852.jpg (138 KB, 1280x1225)

138 KB JPG

im glad im too boring to be followed around like this anymore

>>84289501
>Not necessarily, people do use it for perverse purposes, but AI and LLM doesn't need to be used in that way.
I did not completely mean LLMs, reading what makes one feel good. It's but a note, that an LLM can be potentially used for it.
>more of a pipe dream I guess.
yeah, the tech won't stop developing, which is a good thing, so nothing is out of the realm of possibility in the future, with LLMs even 10 years from now.

>>84289524
I'm not following anyone. I'm just keeping the posts I enjoy.

>>84289534
I hope one day LLMs can be made more useful in these ways.

>>84289548
>I'm not following anyone. I'm just keeping the posts I enjoy
alright, well im glad my posts arent interesting enough to be kept by people anymore

>>84289228
That doesn't bother me. What does bother me is when you go around "hinting" that you know who I am by dropping "subtle references." Shit's annoying.

>>84289568
I would never do this, that would interfere with the posts a person makes.

>>84289572
Then you're already better than all of my "fans." Have fun.

>>84289335
>I only spend about 1-2 hours a day
That's more than most people have to dedicate to a hobby or even their own families. If you are happy doing this then sure keep doing it, but you could learn so much more and produce so much to be proud of if you dedicated yourself to another activity you might like.
I'm not criticising you, I merely speak from experience and with regret. I spent way more time on worst things when I was younger. My enlarged penis veins don't let me lie.

>>84289635
For me it's just a way to unwind. It's peaceful and easy. I'm sure I could do something more useful, but at the end of the day, life should be enjoyed is how I see it.

Who's your favorite poster? Is it a male or female?

Why are there so many creeps on /r9k/?

File: 1775189561824830.jpg (20 KB, 474x485)

20 KB JPG

you nigger cunt we're using an anonymous board because we don't want to be catalogued FUCK

No need to brag about being a stalker, spreadsheet anon.

File: 1774283181589279.jpg (35 KB, 419x424)

35 KB JPG

can you show those full numbers anon? Have you been watching me anon? Please, anon?

File: lrbql5w3f0qd1.jpg (30 KB, 500x500)

30 KB JPG

>>84290147
don't think about it, man

>>84289228
ARE YOU PROUD OF YOURSELF OP
GIVING ALL THESE NICE WEIRD LONELY MEN PANIC ATTACKS

>>84290158
I feel like I need to know if my posts are being tracked

>>84289290
That's why I stopped posting at regular times, but my posts are pretty recognizable. The biggest tell is my photo names

>>84290167
tracked, posted on reddit/twitter for people to laugh at, you run the risk of becoming a low grade lolcow at any moment

>>84289324
Hey, there's people data harvesting you for money right now on every website you use, thing you say out loud, and every time you buy something.

Let this autist have his fun, you were never anonymous

>>84289228
You're gay aren't you

>>84290182
I know there's a paper trail, but it can't really lead anywhere unless you post something that people can find your identity/location from. You can post somewhat specific characteristics about yourself because there are millions of other people who could fit that description. I'm not really scared of becoming viral for my post cause how are they gonna find out it's me? I don't see it the same as being a lolcow, I understand how others would because they're making fun of you for something you wrote but for me there is no shame if it can't come back to me. Only time I would worry is if a person I knew saw it and were able to draw the similarities between me and the post

>>84289228
I do observe Anons, but I don't keep a written record of my observations.

It makes it feel less malicious when I reach out and try to make contact with an Anon.

tfw no creepy stalker yandere fembot gf

>>84290115
I'm not sure whether they're male or female, but what I do like about their posts is how they use English, it's very creative and always fun to see their posts. I wonder if English isn't their first language.

>>84290127
I'm cataloguing posts I like of robots that I recognize, this isn't widespread, you are most likely not even affected.

>>84290134
I'm not a stalker.

>>84290147
I have not been watching anyone in specific, again, this is not about the person behind the posts, it is about the posts themselves.

>>84290158
I have stated many times that I have no bad intentions, everyone should relax and post as normal.

>>84290167
>>84290182
No one is being tracked.

>>84290211
I am not gay, no.

>>84290217
I'm not making any observations, all I do is save the posts I like, and have them sorted by poster.

>>84290261
>everyone should relax and post as normal.
taken right from the fed playbook

File: 1753858316140375.png (231 KB, 622x674)

231 KB PNG

>>84290261
>"I'm not a stalker"
>stalks anons and collects their posts

File: the-fanatic-moose.gif (2.26 MB, 400x225)

2.26 MB GIF

OP is literally gifrel

>>84289228

Spill the beans, anon. Give us a brief summary of the profiles you've built on anons.

>>84290269
What's wrong with saving posts that I enjoy? I do not see the issue with this.

>>84290276
I am not stalking anyone, I simply save posts I like, and sort them by poster. There is no identifying information assorted with these posts that I save, I am not doing anything with these posts like uploading them anywhere. You should be more concerned with the archives if anything.

>>84290287
I don't understand this reference.

>>84289228
I have been posting, often, in vocaroo threads on /soc/ in every thread for the last 3 years. I wonder if anyone does this with my vocaroos.

File: 1768931479336017.png (267 KB, 564x600)

267 KB PNG

>>84290291
>I simply save posts I like, and sort them by poster
>sort them by poster
Okay stalker.

>>84290261
Show one post from each assortment so I can know if I am on there

>>84290308
you're talking to a brick wall delusional psychopath, there's nothing any of us can do to wake OP up to the depth of his sin

>>84290290
I'm not making profiles on anyone, I'm making profiles on how certain robots post, and using those profiles to identify their posts so I can save them, that's it.

>>84290297
That's a fun idea but I personally prefer to read rather than listen.

>>84290308
I'm not stalking anyone, I sort the posts by poster because sometimes I may want to read posts from a certain robot, that's it.

>>84290309
I will not. I do not want to alter the behaviour of any of my favorite posters.

>>84290323
There is nothing wrong with what I'm doing, how am I sinning?

>>84290336
you need to be locked up

File: 1774217340026014.jpg (8 KB, 235x215)

8 KB JPG

>>84290323
I don't think anon is a psychopath. He was no bad intentions
>>84290336
>I will not. I do not want to alter the behaviour of any of my favorite posters.
I understand. I wonder if I am one of those people, but I realise that I am not nearly interesting or consistent enough

>>84290336
>>84290364
treating other humans as your own personal playthings without their consent is very rapacious and de facto sociopathic behavior

>>84290375
Playthings? What play is being done if there is no interaction, neither direct nor indirect?

>>84290363
I have not done anything wrong, I am not doing anything wrong, and I will not do anything wrong.

>>84290375
I'm not treating humans as my personal playthings, I am simply saving posts that I like, and sorting them by poster, that is it.

>>84289228
pretty based ngl
i did similar but for 1 girl, got her dox etc
no intention of being malicious, she seemed nice & it was like a puzzle
she ended up being mean so i stopped

>>84290381
would you agree to a camera being placed in your bathroom? It's just strangers watching you, no harm done. No reason you should feel uncomfortable.

>>84290424
I have no intentions of doing things like this, I would say this is something that is very wrong to do.

>>84290428
Your bathroom is somewhere you have an expectation of privacy, making posts on a public forum, not so much.

>>84290428
It's more like a camera being placed in a public park. You choose do your business in that public park.

>>84290428
The difference is that anons post here willfully, if they don't want the risk of something like this happening then they can post somewhere else. Everyone is acting like OP is committing some sort of crime against humanity

>>84290458
I really did not understand the reactions of a lot of people in this thread, I expected everyone to be indifferent, perhaps find a few people that also do the same, but apparently saving posts I like to read later is very stressful. I wonder how they feel about the archive that saves every post?

>>84290440
>I would say this is something that is very wrong to do
why?

>>84290478
I think gathering personal information about people from a place where they presumably would rather stay anonymous is wrong.

>>84290489
then dont post personal information

>>84290507
Yes, that is good practice, and I would encourage people to not post personal information, but perhaps people make mistakes, or say something they don't realize could lead to their personal information being revealed.

>>84290511
>but perhaps people make mistakes, or say something they don't realize could lead to their personal information being revealed.
not my problem
have they got something to hide?

>>84290536
You are right, it isn't your problem, but is it the right thing to do? I do not think so. I think it goes against the ethos of this website.

>>84290546
>I think it goes against the ethos of this website.
then stop tracking anons

>>84290472
For some reason, it made me a bit happier. The thought that someone finds my posts entertaining on a personal level and cares about me enough to catalogue my posts made me happier. Even though I realise that I am likely not entertaining, recognisable, or likeable enough for this to happen to me

>>84290554
I am not tracking anyone or trying to remove anyones anonymity. I am just saving posts that I like, and sorting them by poster. There is no identifying information. The only difference between the archive and myself is how I sort posts.

>>84290557
I'm glad one person can see it in a positive light. You never know if I'm saving your posts or not. I might even start.

>>84289480
I guess I'm not that famous on /r9k/ despite the little essays I sometimes write, I need to be a flamboyant tranny or something

>>84290571
It's more about the personality conveyed through a post rather than the content of the post itself. If someone makes a well written post there is value in that, but if someone can write any post in an interesting way... that is what interests me most.

>>84290570
>sorting them by poster
then they are no longer anon, you have given them a form of ID
>You never know if I'm saving your posts or not. I might even start.
neither will she

why is everyone freaking out i dont understand theres no harm being done by this it sounds pretty fun

>>84290587
They are still anonymous, I don't know anything about the person behind the posts. I am just able to identify posting patterns.

>>84290593
and im just able to identify her address, same as her neighbours are

>>84290614
Yes and I think this is wrong, it is something I would never do.

>>84289228
This just proves how slow and fake the board is

How
Many nudes if robots do you have archived?

Your ultimate goal is to uncover rad's true personality, who he is, and potentially connect him with James Cameron depending on whether you want the good/bad ending.

>>84290616
This board is very real, I know it is from my cataloguing of certain posts.

>>84290618
I have no nudes of any robots, I am not interested in that.

>>84290620
I don't know who "rad" is.

>>84290620
rad is already known, check the archives
>>84290615
what you are doing is just as invasive if we are all to be truly anon here

now i think I recognize you op. hehehe how does that feel

>>84290635
I am not invading the privacy of anyone. I am just saving posts that I like, and cataloguing them by poster. You should be more concerned about the archives.

>>84290636
That sounds fun! I wonder what you know about me, what sort of inferences you've drawn from my posts.

>>84289568
>hinting
Delusions of reference

>>84290651
>cataloguing them by poster
stop partially de-anonymizing us.

>>84290671
I am not partially de-anonymizing anyone. I only categorize posts by the poster.

>>84290584
It is difficult to maintain good prose and keep a post concise enough to communicate a complex concept without taxing the concentration of who you are conversing with.

>>84290714
Well, one of the posters that I do quite enjoy can apparently barely communicate in English, and that's what I enjoy so much about their posts.

File: 1736605751935121.png (177 KB, 650x650)

177 KB PNG

>>84290714
Shortpost better

>>84290710
>I only categorize posts by the poster.
that is against the idea of being anonymous

>>84290737
I am not assigning any kind of identity to any poster, so I disagree.

>>84290750
>categorize posts by the poster.
explain this

>>84290768
Posts that are made by the same poster are grouped together so I can read a certain posters posts.

>>84290780
>by the same poster are grouped together
you have singled them out from the hoard. how are they still anonymous?
we might as well be assigned IDs.

>>84290737
>>84290750
>>84290780
nta but he's right it's still an identity you're creating for someone because you know things about them beforehand when they make a new post, which being anonymous is supposed to prevent. but it's harmless so I don't really mind.

>>84290804
They are still anonymous because I have no identifying information about the poster that made the post.

>>84290817
I don't know anything about the poster, I have identified their posting style and I am cataloguing posts based on that, not on some information I have somehow found out about that poster.

>>84290829
you do not understand the idea of being anon.

>>84290837
I think I understand it better than you do. I do not know anything about the person behind the posts, they are just as anonymous whether I save their posts or not.

>>84290829
>I don't know anything about the poster
But you do because they usually say things about themselves in their posts.
>Post 1
>I am a short guy
>Post 2
>I like cheetos
Now by post 3 you already know its a short guy that likes cheetos
Again it's fine it's not a big deal

File: 1718293384912723.png (906 KB, 723x731)

906 KB PNG

That's weird if you're ugly, but very cute if you're a cute girl. desu I leave clues on purpose to one day become the target of a sinister yandere stalker

I wish someone liked me like that ;_; once someone posted an old pic of me and asked how I was, that felt like having a friend

yo anon, am i in that list?
also will this list end up like epstein files or will you sell this to CIA for profit?

>>84290849
I'm not interested in those sorts of posts, those are boring. Whether someone is short or likes cheetos is of no interest to me.

>>84290860
I am not a stalker.

>>84290866
It's not that I like the people that make the posts, I have no idea about them, I simply like the posts.

>>84290868
I do not know you sorry.

File: hitagi senjougahara hair pull .gif (799 KB, 500x648)

799 KB GIF

>>84290899
what sorts of posts and people interest you, not-stalker-kun?

>>84290902
People that communicate in interesting ways on a consistent basis mostly. Like I said earlier in the thread, there is one person that posts regularly enough appears to have a very poor grasp of English, and they are one of my favorites.

>>84290899
>Whether someone is short or likes cheetos is of no interest to me.
Lol that was just an example to demonstrate the point. The other guy and I have explained it pretty clearly

>>84290921
I simply do not know anything like that about posters, like I said, those posts do not interest me and I do not save them.

>>84290932
You don't have to but I bet if you showed me a collection of an anon's posts you have I could make an identity and assign some traits to them

>>84290932
anon, do you have a learning disability?

File: pepo-wuo.jpg (3 KB, 112x112)

3 KB JPG

>>84289269
>never make these public, that would feel like an invasion of privacy.
how would leaking posts from an anonymous public forum be an invasion of privacy??

>>84289301
>I sometimes go back and read their posts again I liked them so much.
i dont think you mean hillarious posts, that would be normal. otherwise i would recommend caution... this cannot end well for your mental stability. But if you're a big boy and can tought it out, then whatever

>>84289335
>I don't think I'm wasting my life at all, this is just a fun side activity.
I aggree. some normies just cant appreciate certain puzzles. they lack imagination

>>84289485
>>84289501
do not reach out. but if you have to, never ever even hint at any of this.

>>84290899
>I do not know you sorry.
thats quite understandable
>also will this list end up like epstein files or will you sell this to CIA for profit?
what about this?

I tried really hard to shack up with one of the incest LARPers back in like 2017
I was in her discord messages daily
never managed to get a nude, the closest I got was a wetspot on her panties
lost it to a power outage that fried one of my SSDs

>>84290940
I only save the posts that interest me, and I am not interested in the personal traits of people. I appreciate the anonymity, I like to come to my own conclusions about certain posters.

>>84290950
I do not, no.

>>84291044
>how would leaking posts from an anonymous public forum be an invasion of privacy??
To collate a bunch of them would. What if someone went through the archives and started picking out personal information from that poster, or learned how to identify that poster, and used it for nefarious reasons?

>i dont think you mean hillarious posts, that would be normal. otherwise i would recommend caution... this cannot end well for your mental stability. But if you're a big boy and can tought it out, then whatever
They are just posts that I enjoy.

>I aggree. some normies just cant appreciate certain puzzles. they lack imagination
Thank you for being able to see it from my point of view.

>>84291062
>also will this list end up like epstein files or will you sell this to CIA for profit?
I have no intention of sharing the posts I have saved with anyone.

>>84291077
I backup the posts I have saved personally. I would hate to have to find them again.

>>84291168
The only information you have on forum users, twitter users, etc are from their posts. Do you think they are anonymous? Do you think trip/namefags are anonymous? If you do then I understand

>>84289228
It was only a matter of time until someone did this

Do you truly believe that the CIA hasn't already done this? if you think being watched like this is an invasion of privacy maybe stop posting personal things on public image boards

The fact another anon is doing it is kinda comfy, romantic even (if you are male watcheranon I'm not gay but its still cute and romantic) but I'm probably a bit fucked in the head and so attention starved that I'd consider being stalked by someone who was infatuated with me really sweet and I'd probably want to chat.

I personally do something similar but different. I search for and organise the LinkedIn and other social media profiles of anonymous or semi anonymous people from places like here, blogs written under pseudonyms, news articles or court cases that I find interesting but just like OP once I've read everything about them and written a summary/biography on them I don't do anything with the information. The fun is in the finding out. After that I get bored

File: 1760008931406798.png (781 KB, 1284x1259)

781 KB PNG

>>84291297
>Do you truly believe that the CIA hasn't already done this?
Imagine being the guy who gets paid to figure out which BBC spammers are the same person.

>>84291498
Meh, sometimes.

>>84289228
Have you figured out a name for the poster that posts men bad bait yet?

> Should I stop?
make a wiki

I 100% guarantee you're mistaking multiple posters as one guy because it fits your internal narrative as to how you'd like them to be

This thread is completely useless without a single example of what the fuck you're talking about

>>84292701
you didn't sage doe

>>84292705
Stop scrutinizing me also prove it

>>84292705
Also
>doe
Niggers aren't welcome here

File: __kaveh_genshin_impact_dr(...).jpg (195 KB, 850x1200)

195 KB JPG

shitting myself if im on the list, im not likeable

>>84291545
I'm pretty sure we all know it sl*g
I don't like to namedrop him though, he might think he is famous or something

File: this guy responded two times.png (126 KB, 339x339)

126 KB PNG

>>84292770
Why you had to respond twice?

>anon stalks other anons
>other anons seethe about it
Based. Keep doing it. Maybe one day release some of it.

wouldn't be the first time. at least it's not the fucking admins doing it anymore and then calling around your ip's location to see where you work or intercepting data serverside to repost and gossip about whether you're hot or not with their pops.

>>84289228
This entire thread and you never gave an example of what you find interesting in their posts other than that they are creative and likely ESL. Creative how? With what? About what?

File: like a clown.jpg (52 KB, 1044x783)

52 KB JPG

>>84293697
>Creative how?

>>84293708
Your filenames mean nothing to someone who never watches visual media.

>>84293711
>someone who never watches visual media
Your posturing is funny.

>>84289228
I obsessively think about the Tomoko poster.

>>84293733
That's just called lying. I don't know what that jpg is though.

File: GTXlxMzWQAANfgS.jpg (26 KB, 403x403)

26 KB JPG

>>84289228
To think some mentally ill tranny freak is talking about you on their faggot discord is disheartening.

>>84293711
>never played a video game
>never watched youtube
>never watched a movie
>never saw a webm on 4chan dot org
>never watched a news broadcast
Sounds like a boring life, ESLfag.

>>84293755
Take it further.
>never seen an image on www 4chan dot com
>never used a search engine
>never opened a book with pictures
>avert gaze when passing by advertisements
>hide from billboards
>carbomb magazine stands for having the unholy pictorial

>>84293743
Meme for a compliment being treated as an insult.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tv1LqFCuwPk

>>84293786
Oh.
>genuinely too autistic to have gotten the reference
Is Goodfellas worth watching? Looks like fun.

File: why dont they generate sa(...).png (1.82 MB, 1165x1281)

1.82 MB PNG

do you know who i am?
plz be girl plz be girl

File: Spoiler Image (420 KB, 1288x1600)

420 KB JPG

>>84293796
You could watch Martin Scorsese's Goodfellas this weekend... but isn't there already ANOTHER Martin Scorsese movie that you were planning to watch this weekend, hmm?

>>84289228
I wish someone would do this for me :(

>>84289228
How do you know it's the same person?

>>84293821
If I was going to do a double Scorsese on the holiest of holies, it would have been Taxi Driver and The King of Comedy. Started After Hours not too long ago but it was yanked off streaming shortly after and I'm not invested enough to go look for it. There's also The Age of Innocence for beautiful love of my life Winona, or finally getting around to Gangs of New York, The Departed, or Killers of the Flower Moon.

There's Jesus of Nazareth if I really want to goon to Olivia Hussey as Mary, Mother of God.

t. doesn't watch visual media

>>84293858
>Killers of the Flower Moon
The book is better. The story is more compelling when Leo's character is a side character instead of the main focus.

And as an added bonus, the book isn't visual media.

>>84289228
you are interesting OP, i like you

>>84289228
imagine being the special anon this post is about and never knowing it

>>84293878
The book is about the real story, right? I was only really interested in the angle about the murdered Osage wives and because Lily Gladstone seemed interesting. Of course Jesse Plemons, the most fascinating actor alive, is also there.

>The story is more compelling when Leo's character is a side character instead of the main focus.
I wish you could say this about One Battle After Another. DiCaprio was only good for the Mexican hairless line in that, though it was a fantastic line. I wish we had had more of Teyana Taylor's descent from the revolutionary era as Perfidia Beverly Hills to turning rat. The entire opening sequence is amazing but much like Bioshock Infinite's similar excellent opening falls apart fairly quickly and drags on for too long. Even with Sensei. Paul Thomas Anderson adapted that from Thomas Pynchon's Vineland though, right? Pretty loosely it seems. I still need to watch Phantom Thread but liked Licorice Pizza even if his peak feels like it was Inherent Vice.

t. still doesn't watch or enjoy media, ever

>>84289228
I've thought there would be some spergs that do this and I was right. I had some nigger whine and bitch a couple times about a meme I've used multiple times. Your life has to be hell to be on this shithole site frequently enough to recognize posters. That said it's harmless enough basically just a parasocial fixation.

>>84293832
Start becoming recognizable.

>>84293697
I was thinking the same thing. Assuming this isn't a larp to bait out people that do stalk anons and OP is for real what content posters could be so interesting that it motivates you to catalog their commentary regularly. I'm geniunely curious? Is it the twinks and trannys that act like sleepy teenagers? Or is it intelligent/insightful shit?

>>84289228
One time some foid asked to contact me, saying that she had been obsessed with my posts and wanted to be my girlfriend. I thought that it was an elaborate troll attempt, and so I went along with it hoping to have some fun. It was not, and she revealed that she had been keeping a schedule of when I posted, what I posted about, etc. It was very creepy, and so I told her that I was a pedophile so that she would lose interest and not stalk me anymore.

>>84290899
Can you provide a vague insight into what type of posts they make? I'd like to know if we're stalking the same person/people.

>>84293974
It likely isn't a larp but OP seems to have disappeared without answering. I would have liked to have known considering anons have followed my posts around since the earliest days of this board but I've never thought they were particularly interesting things to say. I like seeing anons pop up and talk to them but I would never think to actually categorize and save their posts.

>>84289228
jokes on you newfags love this because they're attention whores

>>84289228
That's very worrying desu.

how hard do you think it would be to figure out which posts those are in the image just from those last two numbers

>>84293851
Not OP, but after you've been here a long time, you start recognizing a lot of similar characteristics such as their writng style, types of words they use, types of threads they commonly are in, threads they tend to post in, etc. Even if they change up, a bit of those characteristics show through or they really mess up.

As an example, there is a really low-tier /pol/cancer that stays up for close to 4-5 days straight just shitposting here on /r9k/. They have an estimated 25 different larps they use. They constantly deny they are others (e.g. they say they are not a racebait spammer, then deny they are crossposting /pol/ and /trash/ threads, etc.) yet it's always confirmed when they spam so much a mega list of posts are suddenly deleted at the same exact time. They always mess up and their other larps start overlapping.

>>84294212
You say this in multiple threads and you're wrong half the time. You've accused me of it before.

>>84289252
So instead of typing "though" you typed "doe" which is hilarious because obviously you're trying to use nigger speak. And sure that's what it sounds like when you're singing out loud but when you type it you're nothing but the cringiest faggotiest faggt I've ever niggerly faggotedly saw

>>84294225
sometimes people use other typing styles for fun anon

Are you the same anon who figured out how a certain femanon posted, compiled a list of her posts, then posted some of the sexual things she said her and bf did?

>>84293053
This isn't even an argument, God I hate ESLs

>>84294235
Kek when did this happen?

>>84294212
>pol-tier racebait spammer
There are actually like 25 of these people though, its the most common bait I don't think it's just 1 guy.

>>84289228
If you're so good at this, what are some posts I've made?

>>84294222
You've mistaken me for someone else. I don't call it out. Instead, I just laugh at how pathetic it is when I see their posts.

>>84294280
So you're not the person that comes into threads to claim that someone is baitspamming every thread talking to themselves with multiple personas and then say that you know this because all their posts are deleted at the same time so it's obviously the mods banning them and them ban-evading? Because I have the posts where this guy screams about this every time and all the ones where the people in the womanhate thread insult him over it.

>>84294367
Nope. I am not. As I said, I just laugh at how pathetic one person can be.

You all are acting like basic pattern recognition is some esoteric autistic magic. Come on, you don't need an advanced degree in autism to notice that, for example, these two threads were created by the same daily ritualposter:

>>84274971
&
>>84292388

>>84294454
>guy who spams fetish threads is the same poster
well maybe we should stop replying to them then

>>84294060
moids will claim they want an obsessive clingy gf and then do shit like this

>>84294409
Uh huh.

>tfw op never came back to say who they were following

>>84289228
Based. My memory is imperfect, but my hard drive is forever. I don't do this tho, I archive other things.

>>84289228
I hope you recognized me, senpai

>>84294244
It was about a year or so in some news screenshot thread. She was winning some debate until some anon recognized the images she used, and started saying some of the sexual things such as the time she said anal with her bf became a major mess since she didn't prep prior. She seethed and left. It was funnybas hell.

I love you OP. I do something similar, I keep at least one picture of literally everyone I've ever spoken to. Even though everyone eventually leaves, I feel like I have a part of them with me forever. Also for blackmail

>>84294488
Well she was also extraordinarily ugly no offense if you're reading this.

>>84294578
WHAT DID SHE LOOK LIKE, PEDO-CHAN

>>84294582
A very obese light-skinned Aborigine

I was but she left when she a Chad bf.

>>84294578
I'm not that fucking ugly bitch. I have a bf that love me now meanwhile you are rotting away on here like an autist. I hope you rope next pedo freak

>>84294613
And i'm not aboriginal I'm a Latina

oh great the schizo dramafags have taken over this thread like every other. dont you have a discord to post in

>>84294613
Like an abbo from Oceania?

>>84294642
which ones are you referring to

>>84294628
>>84294638
My bad
>>84294643
Yes

>>84294651
they know who they are and so do you

File: 6so10x.png (2.18 MB, 1282x2015)

2.18 MB PNG

>>84294613
>A very obese light-skinned Aborigine
keeeeeeeeek

I'm somewhat recognized by other anons. If OP comes back (he won't), I wonder if he has any of my posts.

I know of 2 anons that recognize my posts, but I've talked to both of them off board so I recognize their posts too

>>84294613
babe wake up, Ultra Light Fat Black Niggers just dropped...

God PLEASE let me fall in love with a parasocial stalker in 2026

>they don't have restraining orders in the double digits
amateurs.

>>84294734
I've got one

I love stalking. I'm not as methodical as you though. I don't keep records.

>>84294734
>>84294740
I've had to get five.

>>84294749
Have all of yours expired? Mine doesn't expire til Valentine's day of next year, kek

>>84294755
"Permanent" restraining orders for maximum lethality/severity only last five years with most being less than that so yes.

>>84289228
good lord man you need a hobby or a job or something

>>84291276
They are anonymous to me as I do not have personal information about them.

>>84291473
I will not post any of the posts that I like as I do not want to alter those posters behaviour. The best way to describe posts I enjoy are posts that use English in an interesting way, or just communicate in an interesting way.

>>84291614
I don't have a need to do this, there would be no point.

>>84292629
This is a possibility, but I highly doubt it.

>>84292701
As I have said many times, I will not disclose any specific posts as I do not want to alter the posters behaviour. Posts that communicate in interesting ways, that have what I would consider a strange interpretation of English.

>>84293180
I am not stalking anyone and I would not "release" anything. All the posts I have can be found on the archives, so really, everything is already out there, it has simply been saved again.

>>84293697
>>84293974
It is not about the content of the post itself, they could be posting about the color of the sky for all I care, but it is how they post, generally. Sometimes it's a personality I feel is conveyed through the way they use language. Sometimes I can't even describe why I like a post.

>>84293747
I would not mind if someone is talking about me.

>>84293832
All I'm really doing is appreciating posts more than once, you likely have people that appreciate your posts already, just not as much as I do.

>>84293889
Thank you! I do not think I'm doing anything special, I am only reading posts I like more than once, after they have fallen off the board.

>>84293897
I am about 80% sure that someone I do enjoy has made a post in this thread, but I cannot be completely sure as their post was so short that it didn't really convey their personality or style of communication.

>>84293917
I see it the same way as someone watching a favorite TV show or movie many times over.

>>84294083
I am not stalking anyone.

>>84294124
Why?

>>84294146
I would imagine it would be quite difficult.

>>84294235
I would never do anything like this, and I do not collect any information on people, I just collect posts that I enjoy, and sort them by poster, so I can essentially read my favorite posts again.

>>84294256
I wouldn't know, some posters are unrecognizable, this post isn't enough to go off of either.

>>84294538
I may...

>>84294552
This is wrong, we do not do something similar.

>>84294672
I could not say, this post isn't enough to recognize someone from, it is too general, too vague.

>>84294744
I am not a stalker.

>>84295165
I have both, but this is just my way of relaxing and unwinding.

>>84295409
I was just kidding about the blackmail part, lighten up would ya?

> I do not want to alter the posters behaviour.
you already did by posting this thread dummy, though a lot of the posters already change their writing style every couple of days

>>84295425
I look at this from multiple angles.

It may change their persona, but are they going to post about the same things, at the same times as they generally do? Will I be able to identify even more of their posts? I would think I could.

But even if they do not, I am okay with that. If they cease posting in a way that I enjoyed, I still have all their posts that I do enjoy, and that is enough for me.

Perhaps a robot will begin posting in a new way, and I'll enjoy their posts! This could be the beginning of a new robots persona that I enjoy.

We're also assuming that everyone will become aware of this thread, which I find hard to believe.

>>84295437
that's right! you can enjoy things in any way you want, but you can't make sure an anonymous person is exactly the person you think they are. that's not a thing you can do! no matter the amount of effort you put into it. it's quite delusional.

>>84295497
I am not going to go into all of my methodology, or how I know certain posts are made by certain robots, but I do know.

Share an example of a robot you enjoy? No need for screens but what you think of them and why you like them?

>>84295520
The robot I enjoy most has constant errors in their posts and spells words a certain way, punctuation a certain way. The content of their posts isn't interesting at all, some of the least interesting posts I've seen on this board to be completely honest, but the way they use language is just amusing to me.

>>84295538
>i like the way they spell but they are boring
This kinda describes me ngl, many anons have insulted my grammar.

>>84295510
why would you not tell us?

>>84295555
I would not want my favorite posters to give up ways I identify them besides their posts.

>>84295555
nice quads or maybe more my sleepy eyes cant tell

>>84295571
it's a bit narcissistic to assume they are in this thread don't you think

>>84295594
I wouldn't say so, they could be reading for all I know!

>>84295599
just tell us, I highly doubt any of it is groundbreaking or somehow identifying of anyone

>>84295604
I will not, I am sorry.

>>84295606
i hope you get doxxed and exposed. I spit on you

File: 1775222396105765.jpg (72 KB, 651x629)

72 KB JPG

>>84289228
How do you recognize individual posters, de-anonymizer-anon? Are you that anon who showed me all my other posts that were connected by me using one of my favorite pictures of a cute cat? Are you a government employee? UK?
Are you "friends" with jannies to get the IPs of posters, mayhaps? You're not using your access to internet infrastructure to do this "hobby" of yours, riiiight?

>>84289228
How are they getting past the captcha? They're a pain in the fucking ass even for me.

>>84295612
I am not doxxing or exposing anyone, if you're trying to imply that I am doing this to others, you are very wrong.

>>84295615
I am not de-anonymizing anyone, I am simply cataloguing posts by posters that I enjoy.

No, that was person was not me, I have never shown anyone all their posts, or anything like that, and I never will, this is something I do just to read posts that I enjoy over and over.

>>84289228
My favorite poster that one dude who is a feminist who always asks any fembot out and then says she only wants chad for not being with him. Doesn't want to penetrate his girlfriend and wants to only do cunnilingus on his girlfriend

File: 1773769202399374.png (92 KB, 288x405)

92 KB PNG

>>84289426
>I am 100% certain I have not.
So, this is either bullshit or you have found a method of verifying your claim of identifying the individual posters that requires resources normal users have no access to.

>>84295691
I did not make this thread with the intention of arguing with people about how I spend my free time.

I wonder if anyone thinks of me

>>84295664
he's not a feminist, he's a leftie

I was recognized few times on 4chan, including r9k, because I repeat same stories from my life.

>>84295704
tell me something about you anon

File: 1775234291214797m.jpg (97 KB, 768x1024)

97 KB JPG

>>84289447
How does that anon "pretend" to be your friend? You didn't start to stream 3 months ago by any chance? :3
If yes, I am certain that the want to be friends is genuine.

File: 1773265823579330.gif (1.35 MB, 400x206)

1.35 MB GIF

>>84289520
Are you implying that reading your favorite posts over and over while touching yourself is normal behavior?

I like being spooky sometimes to creep out anons.

>>84295753
I do not touch myself in any perverse manner while I read the posts I like.

>>84295761
spooky in what way

>>84295696
Does it pay well to sell out your own kind to the man, welwala?

File: 1773123207953692m.jpg (55 KB, 1024x576)

55 KB JPG

>>84295811
So, you're not denying it? I presume you're not some prude who thinks touching oneself is giving in to perversion.

>>84295720
idk 35 khhv, some people would recognize me

>>84295881
I am not sure what this post means.

>>84295894
I denied touching myself in a perverse manner, but I am not going to say that I haven't read my favorite posts while scratching my chin or anything like that.

>>84295710
hes a leftie and a nice guy I forgot to mention that.

Of all the time you have, you decide to be a stalker. That's disgusting, anon. I wouldn't be surprised if I'm on your little stalker notepad file. You might as well make a spreadsheet at this point, gather any datamine data from those posts, and get a profile of them. Why not?

>>84296017
I am not stalking anyone. I just save posts that I enjoy and catalogue them by poster. Do you think the archive is stalking every single person that posts on /r9k/ too?

>>84295921
Do you post pictures of yourself on here and soc

>>84289228
>Is anyone else infatuated with certain robots?
No.
>Should I stop?
Funny. You won't stop no matter what anons will say.
Also, surprised the thread is still going.

File: 0f2e9115eff0ec25ef3633227(...).jpg (751 KB, 3338x2450)

751 KB JPG

I wonder if the jannies who can see IPs next to posts stalk me. I have a feeling they hate me.

>>84296115
The archive automatically takes posts and saves it. You actively take posts and sort them by person. There is a difference, creep.

File: 1775140315526493.jpg (75 KB, 564x564)

75 KB JPG

>>84296270
Anon, that "creep" is doing the Lord's work to "protect the children"(TM)!!!
Nothing glowing here!

>>84289228
how many avatarfags do you have on your list? i can only remember 3, eulanon, taonon, and some touhou girl saying "taking it easy"

>>84296270
The only difference is I discern who I want to save posts of, I don't indiscriminately save every single post. There is nothing wrong with sorting posts by poster.

>>84296401
Zero, I have no interest in posters that purposefully make themselves known, there's no fun in saving their posts, and they generally aren't enjoyable either.

>>84296875
>I discern who I want to save posts of
Which is stalking.

>>84296931
No it is not. Saving posts that are public and free to anyone is not stalking.

File: 1773273870481223s.jpg (2 KB, 111x125)

2 KB JPG

>>84296937
Tell that to the judge, lel. Creep.

>>84289228
can you discern my posts anon?

i thinkk not.

>>84297059
I do not understand what this post is implying

>>84297081
There is not enough to go off of just from this post alone. Although, you look like you perhaps could be someone I do enjoy the posts of, but once again, there is not enough to go off of from this post alone.

>>84296937
Yes, it is. It's not about saving the posts: it's about you recognizing the posts from certain anons and categorizing them. Many ITT have called you on this. You have no self-awareness on this and in denial.

But have it. There's no one here that is convincing you.

>>84297304
But there is nothing wrong with categorizing posters, I am not doing anything with these posts but reading them.

>>84289228
how many robots are you infatuated with and with the most recent one, how many posts have you documented?

>>84297451
The amount of robots that I am saving the posts of is less than 10. The amount of posts saved of the most recent robot is between 75-100.

>>84297458
are they all male

>>84297563
I am not sure of their genders

File: 1774748635661425.jpg (343 KB, 1290x1290)

343 KB JPG

>>84297393
You're creating datasets of individual posters that might leak and get used to doxx people. If your opsec is not perfect you're complicit in the doxxing/harassment that keeps happening.

>>84297575
I am not creating datasets, I am just saving the posts of posters that I like, and I am not putting them online anywhere. If someone were to somehow hack my computer, I doubt they would take lists of posts from the /r9k/ archive.

File: 1773024169807316.png (206 KB, 750x639)

206 KB PNG

>>84297584
You have no idea to what length these no-lifers go to ruin people's lives. Stop being complicit in this harassment, please. You don't want to get implicated when that coordinated harassment campaign gets aired and be examined in court.
You have been warned.

>>84297605
I am not complicit in anything and I will not be. I am not going to show my collections of posts to anyone, and it is highly unlikely that my computer will be accessed without my knowledge, and even more unlikely, that in the case that my computer is accessed by some third party, is that they would decide that they want to take a list of /r9k/ posts. In my honest opinion, you are being silly.

some guy once told me they saved my threads in one of my threads, was it yous? i don't really mind if your intentions are benign. i post agp threads all day LMAO.

>>84289228
Do you have something like a top five favorite anons you know?

>>84297707
That is not me no. I would never do anything like that because I would not want to alter the behaviour of the robots that I like.

>>84297754
Something like that, yes. I am following the posts of more than five regular enough posters on /r9k/.

>>84295966
Are you by chance Scandinavian? You write like Notch lol.

>>84297998
I am against revealing any personal information on 4chan as it goes against the ethos of the website in my opinion, so I will decline to answer this question sorry.

OP would have no means to catalog people here years ago because the traffic went to quickly and further still slow traffic means slower replies so to have the ability to tag people implies most of this is forced content. So OP just showed that this place is glowie town at best, to 3rd world advertisers at worse.

>>84298033
One of the ways I find the posts I like is the search function on the archives, in fact, I find most of the posts I like through the archives. I without a doubt spend more time reading the archives rather than /r9k/ itself, this is a rare excursion for me.

>>84298060
>this fast on damage control

Well at least I have a better idea what you are doing

>>84296122
Yes though not as much on soc

OP, that is really creepy.

>>84298305
Why? I am only saving posts I like to read again later, what is wrong with that?

>>84289228
>Am I weird for doing this? Should I stop?
people have told you several times that you should stop, but you don't seem to understand. do you have any kind of neurological deficiency? maybe diagnosed autism?
either way, you can't really recognize posters. as much as you'd like to pretend you do, you don't have an infallible way to do so. i can paste some desuarchive links on a notepad and screenshot them, you know?

>>84289228
If you have fun doing it, go for it. Why not.
People choose to post here. It's public posts.

I'm usually not able to spot the same posters so I admire you for being able to connect the dots.
Do you notice them by their personalities or the way they type or something else maybe?

>>84296875
>zero
based, basted even

have you ever connected random posts to an avafag? for example, pegging me as me, when id say >95% of my posts dont have my type of image in the thread

fascinating that you all actually seem to be bothered by this. on the board that loves to post other people's pics for whatever bullshit drama of the week and is filled with tripfags and attentionwhores this is what sets you off? really? can't imagine caring about this. when i run into someone in a thread we just start talking again.

>>84298680
Right?
I don't know, maybe I'm not a dickhead so I don't care if someone recognizes my posts.
I nicepost here. I aint got nothing to hide.

>>84298471
I do not have any kind of neurological deficiencies or mental health problems, no.

It is actually quite easy to recognize some posters. It's not the kind of thing you'd understand if you hadn't tried, you almost need to train yourself to notice how certain people post.

People have said that I should stop but they cannot provide any reasons as to why I should stop, they try to claim I am a "stalker", but I am not actually stalking anyone, only saving posts that I like and reading them after the thread has been bumped off the board. These people have no problem with the archive, but someone reading the archive is a step too far? What do they think the archive is there for?

>>84298491
Some of the ways I recognize certain posters is the topics they post about, the times that they post, the way that they communicate, those are the three biggest for me. But really you just need to identify a single person and learn how they post.

>>84298664
I have not, I do not do this to any poster, I'm not keep tabs on a whole bunch of people, there are just a few posters that I enjoy, and when I do find their posts, I save them for later reading.

File: 1604313430426.jpg (75 KB, 1024x576)

75 KB JPG

>>84298750
thinking this site is some den of anonymous sin is so funny to me. it's a website. you can choose to post any way you want here as long as you don't piss off someone with the ability to ban you too badly. there were older mods that tried to be ambassadors to 4chan culture on other sites for whatever reason, and it isn't as if 4chan is some underground secret that requires anything more than a live internet connection to access. moot was doing profiles in 2009, talk circuits from 2010 onward, 4chan has a literal press page you can click on. the consequences that occur are based on people finding you annoying. if you're just niceposting on here then "so and so posts on 4chan" means nothing except to people who think for themselves so little that the mere mention of the site is enough to castigate you in their minds, and those aren't the kind of people worth interacting with anyway.

anonymity is primarily the freedom to experiment creatively and the low barrier to entry and culture of competence-based hostility on here give you unique opportunities to be whatever you'd like to be without your identity markers having any sort of bearing. it's a brief respite from the rest of the world where identity has soldified into the absolute only thing that matters. not to mention it allows people to act in ways that would be considered antithetical or paradoxical to their identity otherwise. the real horror of this place isn't in potentially being profiled and tracked. it's that when given this chance to be and do whatever you want, so many people would rather settle in the lowest common denominator behavior. is 4chan for shitposting, original content, free speech, activism, connection, porn...? it's whatever you want it to be. i choose fun!

>>84290725
>>84290727
Just like Chad some people have a magic quality that makes them charismatic, memorable and beloved.

>>84298800
>Some of the ways I recognize certain posters is the topics they post about, the times that they post, the way that they communicate, those are the three biggest for me. But really you just need to identify a single person and learn how they post.

That's actually so fun. I wish we could make a game out of it.
You know what, I'll try to recognize your posts in the future.
Can you tell me about the kind of theads you usually post in?

We should have a sentence we use so if I ever recognize your post and use that sentence, you can reply back confirming its you (if it's you)

Oh I have another question that may have been posted already but I aint about to read the whole thread.

Do you have any favorite posters you recognize?
Can you share some of their posts so we can understand why you enjoy saving them?
I'm curious as to what you like to save.

>>84298986
hes not going to mention any. he's just an attentionwhore

>>84299022
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
I don't understand why someone would lie about it or something.

>>84289228
So glad I choose random posting and typing styles for each post, purposefully to hide from freaks like you. You'll never identify me. I am Anon.

>>84290913
I wouldn't mind knowing if you liked my posts. Would be nice to know that at least one person cared about me.

>>84299071
I care about this specific post you made

File: 1773643557339034.jpg (35 KB, 326x326)

35 KB JPG

>>84297612
Do you really think your data traffic isn't logged if you didn't use tor or other means to hide your traffic?

>>84290472
can you tell us some of the names you made up for the robots? not any personal information just what you labeled them as it would be fun to guess if im on the list

>>84299086
he fucking won't, he's just attentionwhoring

>>84299075
No, you don't. You only care about the (you) I give, you vapid shallow... anon!

>>84299130
I was trying to be nice to you, I didn't think you'd respond to me.
Now you responded and I don't like you anymore.
I no longer care for your post.

Sounds funny tho

I wonder if you've got me clocked, OP. I think I have a fairly distinct posting style, and have wondered before if someone could tell me apart from other posters based on my writing style or info I'll sometimes hint at. I'll sometimes code switch or write and punctuate differently depending on the thread or reply, though - and I don't browse at specific times. What are the main stylistic cues you look for outside of the obvious ones like word choice and syntax?

>>84299148
Get over yourself, narc

>>84294525
what do u archive anon..?

bumping le epic stalker bread

>>84300071
what's the point? it's not going to share anything with us besides vagueposting

>>84294525
You can destroy your hard drive by scratching it like Adam Lanza

It's funny how people are so ego-focused that they all think "OMG IS IT ME? IS OP RECOGNIZING ME?" like >>84299161

>>84300288
found the pick me

>>84300373
>t. schizo narc

>>84300288
I think that's a very natural response to OP's post and would argue that's probably partially why they made this thread.

>>84290336
>I'm not making profiles on anyone
The very next sentence
> I'm making profiles