Would you say 4chan culture is more hostile to people who are mainly extraverted feeling(ExFJ) or extraverted sensing(ESxP) types?Can't really decide, both of those are very rare to see around here.Also I'm not seeing much in the way of other typologies in these threads, so I'd encourage to post some more Ennegram, Psychosophy/Attitudinal Psyche, maybe even Astrology if you must. As long it's not fucking 16p.
You're all the same brand of LOSER LMAO look at these quasimodo-ass hunchbacks doing online tests to make themselves feel better about being genetic waste
>>84296698I don't know why but I'm genuinely the only person who can never figure out my type because I'm pragmatic and change my personality depending on who I'm talking to and this is awful ugh...
>>84296713If you mean Jungian, that's because "personality type" is a bit of a misnomer and your outward behavior has little to do with it. Ennegram who does that tends to be type 9 more often than not.
>>84296750It's not that it has little to do with it, it's that it's still capable of having little to do with each individual. Like seeing a normal girl who says she is autistic just because. It's just horoscopes that happen to be more empirical than correlating the starts with gaining a fortune.
>>84296750No, it's sort of like changing my behavior depending on the situationFor example, I'd say I'm introverted when speaking to people I dislike or when I don't know enough about a language or dialect or when needing to focus on something like a class which I won't interrupt since it won't benefit me or my reputation to interrupt itFeeling, I don't know if I'm depressed but I doubt I've no idea whether I've felt anything about someone except anger or slight sadness for yearsThinking? I don't really think before stating something, but I definitely judge people in situations that benefit me, but I tend to be more okay with other opinions on some instancesI really don't get it but most things I do are based on whether I'll benefit from an action or not
>>84296793>It's just horoscopes that happen to be more empirical than correlating the starts with gaining a fortune.Arguably MBTI has become that. But actual Jungian typology is not meant to describe behavior patterns or disorders, it's not fucking DSM. Socionics' take on what the "type" is about would be more accurate, but their actual system is a different story.>>84296799>it's sort of like changing my behavior depending on the situationFairly regular, everyone does that to some extent.Now going off what you are saying in your post:>to people I dislike >benefit me or my reputation>I definitely judge people These are hints feeling-judgement is typically perceived as a conscious motivation, and the awareness of the function is high enough. It would be difficult to say if this is actually the main function though.Also in very general terms, introversion seems to weight more than extraversion because there is a certain concern own the subjective reaction and the subject's own position. The extravert is more prone to let these things happen by accident and reap the benefits while they are at it, but typically they don't have much awareness of this, it's usually introverts misunderstanding what extraverts are doing by ascribing them very precise inner feelings, thoughts, or whatever.Now onto this:>Feeling, I don't know if I'm depressed but I doubt I've no idea whether I've felt anything about someone except anger or slight sadness for yearsIt's a misunderstanding of what the function actually does in modern MBTI.Knowing your emotional affects is more about introspection(not introversion) than anything else.
>>84296698>ExFJ>ESxPExplain both of these
>>84296956Sure>ExFJ4chan culture tends to easily oppose anything that's valued both IRL and on the mainstream platforms. Contrarian ExFJs exist but they would be a minority since by definition, the extraverted feeling type wants to look for the most """objective"""(as in, easily accepted by the external world, useful to actual people around them, relevant to expectations given by their current social role, etc.) way to feel about things. The most stereotypical form of this type is basically just the popular girl in your school, how likely do you expect to see this kind of mindset represented here? Though mind you, I have seen it at times.>ESxPAnons very often speak against types who seem to be only driven by material gain or hedonism. Though these types would argue they are not slave of their sensation, they can certainly give that impression outwardly. Also, 4channers tend to prefer wild speculah over just throwing facts at each other without even bothering to have a certain idelogy behind it(this one is important, because for a Se-groids it's facts and reals first and they let them speak for themselves, for a Te-groid it's about the ideology derived from and immediately proven by the data. You will see Te-groids on 4chan)
>>84296713you cant because typology is for retards who like to confine themselves into neat little boxes
>>84296698I think ExFJs are the most likely types to leave due to hostility! :'OESxPs seem stronger against it or they leave out of boredom! :OcAlso, 16p is the best! UwU>>84290746(>^_^)><(^_^<)>accelerateBy enforcing a testosterone ban! ^o^>Si = kawaiiThen what type of cuteness is Ni? OwO>>84297011You type like an INFP(-A)! :P
>>84297048last test I remember doing I was an INTPyour nice response has me feeling bad, so I apologizeenjoy typologicaling
>>84297048>Then what type of cuteness is Ni?Generally gap moe, because it's the whole thing about having a certain contrast between how the character appears outwardly and how they are behind that(which the Ni-groid is able to perceive fairly easily, or likes to imagine it exists as necessary psychological compensation, these types seem to just go for Jung stuff by very nature of their entire mindset).In the sense of how to make the Ni-groid cute, it's the clumsy genius or eccentric visionary artist stereotype.
Intro to the enneagramhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DCoKsnld48
>>84297115https://youtube.com/shorts/E88rWhvv0zs?si=ulYF-S1Hytp2YZbS
>>84297151It's always magical circles all the way down.
>>84297115isn't the ennegram created my a literal cult leader
>>84297590Oscar Ichazo apparently, though eventually it was continued by Naranjo who studied under him.The guy was involved in this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Potential_Movement , you tell me if it sounds like cult-ish enough.
>>84297732Wasn't it created by Gurdijeff or am I misremembering things
Decided to try the testhttps://interesthings-ygt.github.io/AugmentedPersonality/Multifactor%20Enneagram.htmland a few summaries make it surprisingly accurate to my lifeI got an 8w7 sp/so personality, I have no idea what sp/so are though. I am a NEET looking to get my GED so I'm pretty sure they're wrong in that I'd apparently be successful.
>>84297873Apparently it's something like:>Gurdijeff creates the enneagram figure, but does not associate it to certain types>Ichazo is credited with being the one behind Enneagram theories, as well as adopting the figure and establishing 9 types of ego motivations, but kinda like Jung he didn't formalize it>Naranjo is the Myers equivalent who brings up the theory into a more formalized version except he's cooler, he came up with instinctual variants(not tritypes though) and tried to stick closer to what was supposedly the original ideaUnfortunately for us Jvngians, the actual successor(Von Franz) who could have tried to formalize the theory and actually did bring some content to it (the Middle Realm stuff, and in general the focus on inferior functions and mechanics of differentiation) evidently didn't push enough. Myers stole the spotlight and here we are, forever stuck with a theory that's fundamentally Pseudo-Jungian(TM) and doesn't actually go anywhere, the best way to describe it here is trying to justify itself either on very dubious and shaky "empirical research"(which is more about test consistency than anything else, and they can't even achieve that) or community attempts to integrate observations like the fact you can find yourself in a "loop"(99% just misunderstanding what the functions do) or coming up with fancy 8-functions models(straight just missing the basics here, attitude+function is already the type, did you just say I'm literally every type at once?)
>>84297936>ENFP scoreOh shit we getting dangerously close.
>>84298311Shit I never saw these in the one I took.
>>84298509It's https://interesthings-ygt.github.io/AugmentedPersonality/CPTI.html
