>>84297003
STOP POSTING THIS GIGACHAD
THIS IS TOO MUCH
BLACKPILL

>>84297003
>Should we blame the drug dealers or the users?
Both. The answer has always been both. No dealers without users. No users without dealers. All whores and simps should be burned at the stake.

>>84297003
you are overthinking. some people, male or female, are just slutty whores, alright? People have all kinds of hobbies, traits, or even ways of being fucked up. Some are "blessed" with too high of a libido. Some are sex addicts. Some just want to have as much sex as humanly possible and to get paid for it.
You simply do not understand, because you're focused on who you are and what you think about the world. Truth is, factually, nobody gives a shit and never did. You only live once. You won't ever be 18 again. Ever. Do what you want. If you manage to hide your degeneracy and pretend to be just normal like everybody else - even better for you. That's how Muslim and some Asian countries work, for example.
Let me remind you, after all, that all of this is natural. Fucking is natural, alright. It's like any other built-in human function you have.
TL;DR: This is not a big deal.

>>84297600
sex on camera is not normal idiot

>>84297719
Ah, you sweet summer child. On a personal level, I do agree with you. I have never taken myself, sent, or even asked a girl for nudes. I don't see the appeal of just nudity in a random picture.
However, it isn't a big deal for normies. Do you know how much pornography is being produced by normies every fucking day? Have you ever had access to all of it, hypothetically, your entire lifetime wouldn't have been enough to watch all of it. All the pics and vids.
If you ever talked to normies, or Chad, you would have known how much nudes they have from different people. Moreover, they'll even show you some of them, if the conversation will be about "women I date/have sex with".
Another possibility is that you're getting stuck in the past already. We're in 2026, not 1926.
And again the reasoning is the same, not that the people "aren't normal". It's that they are and even somewhat rational. Who will ever see in 2026 with a good partner who won't share. Or even if they would see, who gives a shit? Who gives a shit about the nudes of some random cashier at a super market? A few cum tributors? Not a big deal. On the other hand women produce and save the most attractive erotic and pornographic materials for themselves. To remember how hot they were too. OF is case in point. You hear about teachers being fired left and right, because they went full OF and made more money there than from their job? Do you know what I say? Good. Having money is more important and better than being a poor wagie.
TL;DR: It isn't normal for you because you aren't typical normie. Normies share nudes with each like you wouldn't believe. Wake up, grandpa, it's 2026.

>>84297003
>>84297719
>>84297759
share nudes with each other*

>>84297759
i shared hundreds of nudes with the 37 girls i've been with but i'd never do porn for other people to see. retards and people who were sexually abused as kids do that

>>84297759
>>84297763
why do you type like a boomer lmao kek

>>84298856
because I'm old.
>>84298137
you didn't, other people did. just as anecdotal as your experience. except we have evidence in form of websites like of, and fansly, and girlsgonewild communities, and so forth..

>>84297759
wordslop

>>84297003
I dont mind whores and would marry one

>>84299781
hi nico pussentes
desu