>God will never leave me nor forsake meSo they poured out for the men to eat. And it came to pass, as they were eating of the pottage, that they cried out, and said, O thou man of God, there is death in the pot. And they could not eat thereof.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRXDYvpA020
God is not real. You are delusional.
Poisoned tendies... It seems that new internet lingo is borrowed from the sharty or twitter these days instead of the chans. It's not a bad feeling, no more pressure. Maybe unironic greentexts will make a return at some point. All the redditors that screencapped them are probably dead from aids by now.
>>84301085God made humanity in His image. You are real, therefore, you should know that God is.If we evolved randomly, there would be no majesty to nature, nor desire to appreciate it.
>>84301080would you suck a trillion monkey cocks to completion if your god commanded you to do it? and you have to disembowel each of them after making them cumor are you an unfaithful pig
>>84301096God made me shit my pants just now, really!
>>84301099You make a good point anon, It is a kind and loving thing the Lord has done, in giving us commands that aren't contrary to the conscience, or to the barriers of one's mind which he put within us. Everything is in accordance to nature.
>>84301193kind and loving thing to let people wwho rolled bad rng on spawn to suffer consequences eternally raised with wrong religion? probability determines youre probably going to hell!aint that peachy! i love eternal punishment for finite crimes
>>84301220>kind and loving thing to let people wwho rolled bad rng on spawn to suffer consequences eternallyIf you've rolled a bad rng in general, you're more likely to get saved anon (lazarus and the rich man for example). Deformed, poor, isolated people are more likely to be able to put away their pride and ask God for salvation, people whose circumstance is good (rich, good standing with peers, successful in business) will be more prideful, and therefore less likely to accept the Gospel, unless it reaches them in their youth (generally).>bad rng for being raised religiousBeing a convert myself, I have little sympathy for those born outside a Christian home, who choose to reject the Gospel. Nevetheless, there is some truth to this, from how we live our lives, our descendants will prosper or suffer, we choose what heritage they will grow up with, many selfishly choose to live poorly and give their children bad rng (being raised in a smoking household will make you a smoker for instance). This goes for as far as 3 or 4 generations. I must add however, that the last half of your post demonstrates a childish worldview. You seem the type to argue against the death penalty for murderers, and to argue that one's 'circumstance' is to blame for crime. I must softly push against this.
Rabbi Yeshua is dead, and it's a shame his cult still infects a billion minds along with the billion minds infected by other Abrahamist nonsense.
>>84301287You have the right impulse, but you're being manipulated to use it in a bad way. Christianity is really different than whatever catholics, muslims and jews believe in.It's not good for someone with the rare correct impulse to end up in hell with jews anyway. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41l_Lne-hAQ&This should clarify the misunderstanding. Listen to it in the background while gaming or something.
>>84301085>less than a minute>already butthurt in the threadthat's some bot reacting to keywords, isn't it?
>>84301357why not catholics?
>>84301271yes if you were born an indian in a brick making debt slaved family you will surely turn to the Christian god and not whatever gods your parents worship usually. My main point in that circumstance is just that if you were born in a predominantly religious area say like in the middle east you are statistically more likely to not turn into a christian as opposed to someone born in a christian family. Then as such, there would be more middle eastern people in hell no?the last point is not really arguing against the death penalty, more so arguing against eternal torture for not having faith in a particular religion. my main biggest gripe with Christianity is the entire concept of eternal punishment for not having blind faith. Unless my understanding that hell is a burning lake of fire is incorrect.
They try to combine their own works (through confession, the sacraments, even baptism) with faith in Christ in order to go to heaven. It's against what is written in the bible, they do it because the foundation of the catholic church is tradition and their own cultivated version of history, rather than the bible. From an outsider's perspective, this would seem like a small difference, but, decades of them taking authority from "popes" and "church fathers" has led to them developing really weird doctrine on many matters, the only thing in common with Christianity at this point is that they use the cross as a symbol and reference Christ (even muslims do the latter). They've sort of played chinese whispers with what the bible says, and they're bound to it, even now, when the bible is available everywhere in the common tongue, because of their made up organizational structure and traditions.
>>84301560>yes if you were born an indian in a brick making debt slaved family you will surely turn to the Christian god and not whatever gods your parents worship usually.If the gospel comes to you, or you move to England, Australia, Canada or New Zealand (as very many are doing these days) and hear it, or if a missionary comes to you, yes you are markedly more likely to accept the Gospel than a rich westerner raised on 90s atheism talking points. >My main point in that circumstance is just that if you were born in a predominantly religious area say like in the middle east you are statistically more likely to not turn into a christian as opposed to someone born in a christian family. Then as such, there would be more middle eastern people in hell no?Yeah, this is true. We inherit the circumstances our parents pass on to us. The bible puts it a bit more harshly, but I'll try not bog you down with text. >more so arguing against eternal torture for not having faith in a particular religion.From an outsider's perspective it might seem that way, and biblical stories (Garden of Eden, the flood, Christ dying on the cross) might seem random. These are all told for the purpose, and they have meaning. >Garden of Eden, Adam eats the fruit, his children (all of humanity are cursed) >Humanity turns wicked >God kills everyone on earth the best guy and his family (Noah's arc) >His family repopulate the earth and humans return to being evil >Humans return to sin again and again>One sin is enough to condemn you to hell>hell was invented to punish the devil and the angels that rebelled with him>God, loving humanity sends Jesus Christ to live without sin, take up the world's sin on the cross. >Salvation now available to mankind >Blind faithFaith is the only way to please God, you can't give him anything that he doesn't already have. The bible doesn't really praise the concept of 'blind faith' though, you should try to prove all things.
>>84301560>hell is a burning lake of fire is incorrect.Hell ends up in the lake of fire (along with all the dead) when the world ends, so you're more or less correct here.
>>84301656>you can't give him anything that he doesn't already have.(because all things came from Him). It could be deduced therefore, that the purpose of giving man free will was that some would have faith.
fishtank status
