[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1771965276009057.jpg (92 KB, 896x960)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
sex without love, or love without touch?

would you rather have easy access to someone who, at best, is tolerant of you if not actively hates you but is willing to booty call basically at a moment's notice and do whatever depraved sex act you want

or someone who listens to you, talks with you, understands you, loves you, adores you, makes you feel better when you're sad and watches whatever media you like with you or plays games with you but it's all digital so you can't even hug
>>
>>84310366
Sex without love and it's not even close to close
t. Sexhaver
>>
>>84310366
i'd go with the latter, honestly. you can love a friend, it doesn't have to be more than that.
>>
>>84310366
I tried a relationship with a woman who did not believe men and women should touch at all before marriage. And I mean that literally. No hugs, no tapping in the shoulder. Nothing. I fell really hard for her for a few months but I actually went insane being unable to even kiss. I can do no sex for a time, but no physical contact whatsoever? I cannot do that.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.