2, and then rape her daily

File: 1709948945322.jpg (2.51 MB, 1488x2105)

2.51 MB JPG

I should mention that both of these hypothetical women love you a lot, each in their own way.

>>84373169
>2 hates PIV
I feel like you left out anal here on purpose.
Dom girl that hates PIV but likes it up the butt is very cute.

File: 1707856584338.jpg (327 KB, 1500x1895)

327 KB JPG

>>84373195
No, she doesn't like anal either
Your sex life would be eating her out, fingering her, and kissing her toes. If you ask nicely she might let you cum with her feet on your face but if you don't specifically request it, she's not going to offer.
She's just all about getting her own physical pleasure, that means lots of clitoral stimulation, anal does nothing there.

>>84373169
1 but would take either

>>84373169
I think most men would obviously pick 1
Femdom fetishists would also pick 1
Actually submissive men would pick 2, but they are quite rare

>>84373212
this is literally the dream, I need a two-tier breakfast gf

>>84373169
I've dated both and I preferred the second one, honestly.
There's nothing like the thrill of knowing it's "real", it's not roleplay, she actually is just domineering. I totally get why natural femsubs end up with actually abusive men.

>>84373169
Option 2 is the only one that's actually dominant. That's how real dominant women actually are IRL.
That being said I'm picking option one any day, I want a woman who will indulge my fetish for me occasionally, not someone who will be a bitch and boss me around and actually control the relationship.
For anyone who's not a spineless push over a relationship with option 2 would be miserable.

File: 1603296945761[makima].jpg (59 KB, 680x483)

59 KB JPG

Both are nice but I think a relationship with 2 would be more stable
also weird that she'd get off from fingers and mouth but not want piv. whatever, I just want to be a knight and have a princess to serve, spoil and pamper all my life, sex is not important.

>>84373179
>>84373169
where do you find these artworks btw?

File: __lumine_and_tartaglia_ge(...).jpg (274 KB, 1354x1549)

274 KB JPG

>>84373368
/femdom/ on /trash/

File: 1746370831961422.jpg (43 KB, 563x579)

43 KB JPG

>>84373339
(I'm OP)
I agree with your first point.
I think real dominant people of any gender aren't that kinky, real dominance is basically sexual selfishness and most often manifests as non-reciprocation. Getting yourself off without regard for the other person.
Going super kinky and tying up your sub and spanking them and making them cum 1000 times is basically something that open-minded switches do when roleplaying as a dom, lol
I don't think that's an issue, as you mentioned I think the vast majority actually prefer this (good, giving, and game).
And I also don't think that true sexual selfishness is a bad thing, trusubs (who are quite rare as you say >>84373311) thrive on it

>>84373366
For the purposes of this hot hypothetical she struggles to get off from PIV and in any case sees it as demeaning to women.
From a purely physical pleasure perspective I think oral+fingers feels better to most women, PIV does feel good but not good enough to get off unless accompanied by psychological arousal, more of a femsub thing desu.
Look at how women get off while masturbating, it's all rubbing and vibrators and rose toys

>>84373368
I just save them from 4chan mostly

>>84373409
I agree completely. This is also why i have no plans to ever do femdom IRL. There's just simply not enough women into it that aren't trannies or more like option 2 as described here.

File: Goddess Kim Possible meet(...).jpg (70 KB, 736x921)

70 KB JPG

>>84373169
Reading the second option got me harder. I should want the first option but my cock is desperate for the second.

>>84373169
2 has a hotter disposition but I don't wanna have to do all that crap so I'll take option 1

2, submission has nothing to do with sex

>>84373169
I really don't see a point in option 2. I only want to be dominated in the bedroom, leave the rest of our relationship's dynamics out of the fantasy

File: image_2026-04-17_194115441.png (850 KB, 850x748)

850 KB PNG

>>84373169
>Option 1:
>- Will fulfil any of your depraved, kinky desires in bed: she'll roleplay, whip you, peg you, ballbust you, cuck you if that's what you're into
>- She does get turned on by it, because she is generally quite kinky and sexual in all ways, but her main motivation is making you happy - for another man she might have been a sub
>- High libido and always wants it
>Option 2:
>- Exudes naturally dominant vibes in every way
>- Assertive and demanding, bosses you around outside the bedroom
>- Protective and possessive over you in public
>- Sexually selfish, expects you to give her orgasms every time (e.g. via oral or fingers) and doesn't care if you cum or not.
>- Sex once a week on her terms

personally these are the only qualities that i am fine with despite option 2 having more qualities that i am fine with i'll go with 1. Mainly because of ease of living with her.

and i dont think most men are that much submissive that they will choose 2. they are only submissive as long as the woman doesn't make their life a living hell. most "submissive" men arent ready for the real dominant woman

despite what i said my dick tells me to choose option 2

also >>84373240 is this you?

>>84373470
very relatable

File: 1722609771828.png (613 KB, 500x651)

613 KB PNG

>>84373453
There definitely are a decent number of women into the kinkier aspect but they're all megaswitches who will get their fix of being dominated somewhere, either from you or someone else.
With a horny submissive partner they often end up as hotwives.

>>84373545
>>84373557
Normal healthy men

>>84373470
Unhealthy freak just like me

>>84373169
Submissive men are disgusting and aren't real men. Send them to the frontline to die.

>>84373587
I can't be drafted I'm too skinny

>>84373592
They'll fatten you up, don't worry. And if you refuse you can die in a cell I don't care. The only way you should be allowed to live is if you're castrated, nuts and dick.

>>84373606
They already tried to draft and failed to draft me for zat reason

>>84373628
Then someone needs to cut off your twig and berries. Or they need to do a second run and ignore any bullshit excuse and just send you. Only real men deserve to live

>>84373169
I prefer 1, Fetish life stays at the bedroom. The second is just the average woman

>>84373647
I don't think you've met the average woman

>>84373729
I did and so have plenty of coworkes, classmates, team mates...
Believe me that the average woman is the second one: low sex drive on her terms and bitch but possessive.
A woman that is nice, kinky and has a sex drive, now that's weird

>>84373639
What qualify as a ''real woman'' then? At which point do tubes get snapped?

File: 1647288665111.jpg (609 KB, 850x1038)

609 KB JPG

>>84373409
I'd love to have a sex life based mostly around pleasuring her with my fingers and mouth. desu the bigger issue would be that once a week is not often enough for me... I'd like to see her cum once a day.

>>84373169
2 would be very fun for a short while. Would become unbearable after ~1 year. 1 sounds ok for a stable relationship, though I might get annoyed with her being a pushover in the long run. I don't wanna lead nor be lead in a relationship, I want a partnership. Though at least 1 cares about me, unlike 2.

File: 1709942135199.jpg (107 KB, 1080x1542)

107 KB JPG

>>84373739
It's true that most of the women I've dated are low-medium libido selfish pillow princesses. But I absolutely select for that.
Most women I know think of themselves as submissive, enjoy rapey romance literature, want the man to take charge. It's a different vibe.

>>84373829
True, I think in my ideal world, it would be every day as well. But it's about her wants and needs, not yours. 1 is about fulfilling your every fantasy, for 2 you have to sacrifice frequency for authenticity.
You can give her daily massages and other nonsexual pampering though

>>84373838
They both care about you :)

File: 1757167946521530.gif (657 KB, 480x480)

657 KB GIF

>>84373169
Unironically 2. I feel like 1 can get out of hand real fast.

>>84373169
I could do with either frankly. As much as I love femdom, ultimately it's just a fetish. I care more about how well we click personality wise. Will she be a quiet nerdy introvert who hates socializing like me? Will we have pleasant conversations and do fun stuff together? If so, I'm down for just abou tany "style" of femdom. From those two options, #1 seems a little better sexually and #2 also sounds like she could cross the line from bossy to bitchy which is a concern. Overall I'm not too keen on people who are dominant IRL, though she doesn't have to be kind of a pushover like #1, just independent. So I prefer option 3:
- Will fulfill a reasonable amount of my kinks, within her limits, and likewise will try to get me to fulfill hers, respecting my own limits.
- Has switch potential, with natural enjoyment of both dominance and submission.
- Moderate libido, is fine if I'm not in the mood.
- Respectful and open-minded, but critical and skeptical, won't play along with any nonsense and can call me out on my bullshit and stupidity.
- Generally hates most people and just wants us to pair up against the world.
- Understands the difference between a fetish and real life, can get off making me her bitch boy in the bedroom but we treat each other like normal human beings otherwise.

Option 1. And that's how I discovered I'm not an actual sub.

File: 1761118526627424.jpg (96 KB, 1140x1180)

96 KB JPG

>>84373169
Both is disgusting. Submissive men are dead ends and I'm going to be insensitive and say that they don't deserve finding love from a woman. They can't satisfy number one because they're pussies and therefore are ruining women. They are a detriment to society if they are simps going after number two. Any dominance in a woman has been rightfully bred out if male degeneracy spreads that far. It's worse than being a faggot or a tranny. At least those are completely unimportant.

>>84373907
Oh god yes please I'm already hard keep telling me how worthless I am.

>>84373992
Where's the option for a powerbottom that'll groom my weak pathetic ass into becoming a real man?

>>84373992
I'm a man. You won't find women with thought
out opinions and that's why you won't really hear anything like that from them addressed to you.

>>84373888
It's ok, not many men are
Lots of men have a femdom fetish but that's different. It's just a general result of their hypersexuality

File: 1672351453214.webm (482 KB, 600x338)

482 KB WEBM

>>84373169
The first one. I want a chill relaxed relationship where I get my prostate milked on a regular basis.

I would pick 2 because a person like that would give my life a meaning. I dont care about having friends, all I want is one person I can dedicate my life to and stand behind and support them all throughout life like a servant but with romance involved.

File: 1678693022526.jpg (172 KB, 900x800)

172 KB JPG

>>84375211
Hot and bhased

File: 1742557038909996.jpg (39 KB, 480x447)

39 KB JPG

>>84373169
I wouldn't choose either, I'm not looking for a fetish dispenser prostitute or someone that doesn't treat me with respect or dignity, I expect to be able to have a genuine emotional connection outside of bdsm dynamics or sexuality in general. If I cannot tolerate her as a friend then I cannot certainly tolerate her as a partner much more someone I can actually fall in love with a prerequisite to intimacy I'm fully aware that I have unreasonably high standards that virtually disqualifiy 99% of women. However I honestly prefer to be alone then settle for someone that I'm incompatible with in the long term. I'm 100% a vocel and openly admit so irl, I've rejected women that we're clearly dominant and assertive enough to ask me out because I knew that fundamentally we are too different.

File: i exist for her sake.jpg (360 KB, 1280x1798)

360 KB JPG

Fetish aside I just want to find my soul mate, my second half, and I imagine her as a sinister, melancholic, misantropic, possesive woman. What sexual acts we'll engage in is not important to me as long as we kiss and cuddle a lot.

>>84373169
1.
I'm not submissive though

File: 1748887869381618.png (402 KB, 1287x2100)

402 KB PNG

Option 2. I hate the feminism part and while I'd love to eat her out all day her lack of other interests would get repetitive, but I could tolerate those. I'd like it if she abused and raped me instead, maybe PIV if I'm a good boy. I can't believe self-proclaimed subs would pick option 1, but I guess that one's more realistic

>>84373169

They both have flaws. I'd want a mix of the two. But option 1 would have to be it.

Option 2 is just a lesbian who will just replace me. Plus, I don't want to fuck somebody like my sister, who's already like this minus the sexual stuff. Option 2 has this whole other layer to it. I want to fuck somebody like my mom, who is dominant and cares about my health, but not my sister, who is dominant and is merely possessive over my time. I could only love somebody like that platonically. But I can't just fuck my mom.

While I like spending time around my sister and doing what she tells me to do, and she is smart, I also don't see her or women like her as very wise or grounded. Or straight, for that matter. The control people like her exude comes from a place of insecurity, which while exciting, also isn't really going anywhere if said person only wants oral from me or fingering. She's going to do all this manipulative shit and push all these bounderies for what? So I can cook her a meal and give her pussy a pat on the back for a job well done? My sister is going to get married to some guy, but idk how that's going to go. Not my problem.

Call me shallow, but Option 2 would need to be an alpha female, billionaire werewolf type who claims me as her trophy husband for it to work out.

Imagine a romance novel with the two.

>>84373169
Dominant personalities aren't real, we live in a polite society and dominance both in men and woman is antisocial and autistic.

>>84373169
Interesting dilemma. Obviously the ideal would be a woman who has the qualities of both options without any of the drawbacks. Option 1 is better in the bedroom but option 2 is an actual leader outside the bedroom which is very attractive to a malesub like me. Also the fact that you describe option 2 as "Protective and possessive" is quite enticing. I feel torn. My choice would depend on which one is the most loyal, the most likely to stay with me no matter what. Here's the thing: I don't want to dedicate my entire life to someone who will break up with me on a whim.

>>84373169
>Would you rather have a girl who is sexually domineering but otherwise nice or a girl who is all around a bitch and doesn't even give you sex?
This isn't even just a 'femdom' thing at this point it's straight up paypig/cuck shit. A woman can be outwardly dominant and not exhibit half the shit you described in terms of how 2 acts in public. I'm not a 'true' submissive guy, more of a switch (which I think you have to be to be ensouled) and 1 sounds better in every way, even if I would still prefer to date someone who doesn't just lift their morals and values from me and stands up for themselves.

Whomever will avenge me if I get killed.

>>84374040
>women with opinions are too smart to talk to someone like you

My gf is all of option 1 plus
>Exudes naturally dominant vibes in every way
>Protective and possessive over you in public
And altho not sexually selfish, she does expect orgasms every time. She doesn't hate PIV, we just don't do it that often. Unless she explicitly asks for it, I prefer to eat her out.
We're both very glad to have found each other. Otherwise she'd be a lesbian and I'd be a fag or a full tranny lol.

>>84373169
Option 1, by far. I want kinky femdom sex (and maledom sex too sometimes) but in daily life I'd prefer to shoulder the burden of responsibility.

>>84377182
Some people have all the luck, jesus christ. A lotta girls I've tried to date ended up being coping lesbians and it's fucking awful.

>>84377361
We are both weirdos. In a way I am a coping fag/tranny and she is a coping lesbian (in reality we're just both bi and weird). It's just that we're so compatible as a personality that it simply works out.
And yeah, we are both lucky to have found each other. We've been together for 9 years now.
Tbhon, we also exist to spite our haters. We're both "failed" people. She's not feminine enough and I'm many things but not quite masculine/"real man" lol. We're definitely helped by the fact that we didn't grow up with social media (poorfags background and we're also in our mid 30s).
>coping lesbians and it's fucking awful
Pro-tip: lesbians who are smaller frame do have some androphilia in them too and it can work out. Butch lesbian types are more dominant but they rarely like males :(

option 1, obviously

File: 1768287425113834.png (378 KB, 1000x720)

378 KB PNG

2 i work the best being steered by someone and my degenerate paraphillias can take a backseat because structure is important

>>84377407
People have called me a repressing troon or a closet fag even when I've been open and explicit about what I look for and don't really care about the titles. I'd also be considered very weird by anyone who actually got to know me, and a "failed" person by many. I'm probably more masculine than you are but it's not really anything I put any effort into.
>lesbians who are smaller frame do have some androphilia in them too and it can work out.
I'm not really into butches anyway so that'd be fine but every single fucking one has been cowardly and manipulative and completely incapable of communicating anything. The kind of person where you end up in a situation where you can clearly tell somethings up, but no matter what they wont talk about it, and then a few months later they cheat on you and say "I'm just not attracted to men sorry :(" even though they made no effort to break things off before cheating. This has happened multiple times.
Blogpost basically but yeah. Where I live, even though there's a lot of bi women, they almost all have ridiculous standards for men and basically no standards for women, so it's an unwinnable game unless I work my ass off to be a top tier guy, and maybe even not then.

>>84377453
>and don't really care about the titles
Healthy mentality.
I mean, I am an estrogenized dude.
>I'm probably more masculine than you are
Very likely, yes.
>cowardly and manipulative and completely incapable of communicating anything
That's most women, unfortunately :(
I've not been cheated on (or at least Idk if I have) but what you're describing is very similar to my dating life until I met my now de facto wife (we're not getting legally married because in my country the laws are fucked up).
>they almost all have ridiculous standards for men and basically no standards for women, so it's an unwinnable game
I used to believe that. Then I logged off from the Internet and just enjoyed life. Events, concerts, I fagmoded multiple times (still do occasionally) and I got to meet more people like that. It's how I met my gf too - at a queer-coded event (not explicitly fag/queer but 80% of the participants were weirdos).
What women say and what women do are two different things. I may be a failed man, but even I know this. But maybe your geography sucks, ig.
If my country were a US state, it'd be a red state like maybe Florida - tolerant but also conservative both fiscally and socially.

>>84377487
Well here's the big question; would your GF have given you the time of day if you weren't estrogenized and 'fagmoding'? I mean you even said you met her at a "queer coded event". There's a TON of LGBT people here and I was going to concerts and such where like a third of all the people there were most likely trans, if not more. I do not look remotely 'queer' and am not a twink. No interest in performatively doing the former and probably couldn't do the later even if I wanted. Despite being slightly bi and engaging in a lot of gender and sexuality stuff (to a point where one of the TA's I had in college asked me to take a course on that stuff because she really like a paper I wrote) it is blatantly obvious people who are 'queer' in some way completely write me off.
I know women are very known for saying one thing and doing another - I mean, the one who cheated on me is a perfect example - but I'm not gonna try to 'chase' a woman who has a laundry list of stated expectations and bias' against guys. Even if it is all bullshit, why would I wanna date someone who acts as childish as that?

>>84377546
>would your GF have given you the time of day if you weren't estrogenized
Yes, because I wasn't estrogenizing 9 years ago (tho was seriously considering it).
>and 'fagmoding'?
Probably yes, but fagmoding did help. I'm only her second man but her ex is also a very fem bifag.
And given that we've been together for 9 years and have a kid together too, I will conclude that she is into me for who I am.
I don't think it's bad to be into femfags. Not only because I benefited from it (after being mistreated for it for a long time) but also because I have/had my own laundry list too. I mean... I did reject girls for not being kinky enough or for being misandrists.
>I'm not gonna try to 'chase' a woman who has a laundry list of stated expectations and bias' against guys
The bias part I know exactly what you're talking about. And definitely agree.
As for the laundry list, Ig it depends what's on the list. My gf preferred a sexually submissive guy. Fagmoding in public wasn't a must but it helped.
Just like I preferred a sexually dominant girl. She's not pooning/lesbo-moding in public except when we go to festivals where everyone is weird anyway.
>it is blatantly obvious people who are 'queer' in some way completely write me off
>why would I wanna date someone who acts as childish as that?
I hear you. You're clearly American. This is a very Anglo disease, unfortunately.
We're European (continental) and queers/weirdos come in much more ideologically diverse chunks than in the US. It is shocking to me how big of a pressure it is on American fags/trannies/queers/whatever to be gigacommies, misandrists and generally off-putting. Here we have trannies in the far-right party lol.
Political diversity also leads to wider personality diversity. So yeah, your geography sucks due to a more restrictive culture, unfortunately. Your only chance is to look for the more closeted girls who feel like you - sexually weird but don't want to be associated with those people.

>>84377597
What I was specifically getting at is would she have been into you if you weren't fem, and maybe even not bi? Maybe it is just that different over there but people here pretty much demand you 'show your colors' in some way to not get completely ostracized from those kinds of communities - but even then, I am not really fem at all and I dunno if I really buy that there's a contingent of secret bi women claiming to be lesbian who are actually into traditionally masc guys.
>Here we have trannies in the far-right party lol.
We have those too but I also wouldn't wanna be around them much.
>Your only chance is to look for the more closeted girls who feel like you - sexually weird but don't want to be associated with those people.
Genuinely don't know if this exists here. 'Womens sexual liberation' is such a huge thing and they'd have to have REAL weird or outright fucked up fetishes for anyone to bat an eye, and 'queer' culture is often treated as synonymous with 'womens spaces' so the only way I imagine a woman like that existing is if she's very conservative which doesn't really align with her being into me. I could MAYBE see a trans girl being more like that but the ones that are remotely into men tend to be giga-submissive and anxious-avoidant, and if they're against being involved in "queer" stuff then it will literally be trying to find a needle in a haystack.

1 is a dream come true .

>>84377656
>she have been into you if you weren't fem
Idk, but probably not given that her ex is also fem. She clearly gets wet from that. Except I like that too, lol.
>and maybe even not bi?
Yes. She doesn't care unless I cheat her with a guy, Ig.
>Maybe it is just that different over there but people here pretty much demand you 'show your colors' in some way to not get completely ostracized from those kinds of communities
Yeah, that doesn't happen here.
There are unironic carpenters who look and feel very trad masc who show up in fag spaces. I should know 'cause I briefly dated one lol.
>I am not really fem at all
That's ok. It probably runs in the family. My dad is not fem at all but my mom is sexually dominant.
>I dunno if I really buy that there's a contingent of secret bi women claiming to be lesbian who are actually into traditionally masc guys
I dunno about the latter, but a lot of self-claimed lesbians are in fact bi. This shows up in surveys and revealed preferences all the time anywhere in the world. And I've seen it happening way too often IRL.
>'queer' culture is often treated as synonymous with 'womens spaces'
Yeah, that's a fundamental difference from here.
Here queer culture is estrogenized ('cause a lot of guys like me show up) but not as synonymous with women's spaces at all. In fact, if we count trannies, queer spaces are majority amab still.
>[trans girls] that are remotely into men tend to be giga-submissive and anxious-avoidant
Really? Here we get a lot of trans girls from LatAm (Brazil in particular) as immigrants. Half of them are tops/domineering lol.
I'm really sorry that the American spaces are so brainwormed :( but I'm also not surprised. Every facet of American culture has become utter shit and filled with insane and extremist people.

>>84377710
>Here we get a lot of trans girls from LatAm (Brazil in particular) as immigrants. Half of them are tops/domineering lol.
We get a bit of that but it's not really immigrants. I'm also not really looking to bottom. Ideal would be to find a girl who's a powerbottom, but I would take one who's a switch. But yeah, it's pretty shit here. Maybe wouldn't be so bad if I lived in a different part of the US but I can't really afford to just move what would be multiple countries away in many other places of the world period, let alone just because there MIGHT be a girl who's my type there.

>>84373169
Definitely option 1.

>>84373169
1 clearly.
2 is literally most females today, especially from college or other brainwashing centers. She isn't dominant, she just follows someone that is not you

>>84373169
2, I'd like her to use and abuse me and order me around in daily life, saying misandrist things to me while doing it, but I expect she'd be open to degrading me, trampling me, leashing/spitting on me, using me as her toilet etc...

1 is my ideal in all honesty. I'd rather her dominating vibes be generally restricted to the bedroom. I imagine if she's totally deferential to me when making decisions, that it will result in a lot of me being uncomfortable at first. If I was certain she liked me, I could warm up to making more decisions for us or taking the lead. Generally my lack of validation in my life predisposes me to be uncomfortable taking the lead for other people. I don't want to make a decision if there's a possibility of rejection by the partner, but that disappears if the girl shows that she's comfortable with me with time.

Generally, I just want to make a girl happy, feel useful, and be accepted and liked by them. But I'd rather have a partner that's willing to spar a bit as equals, have their own wants and desires, or introduce me to stuff that I might not expect.

2 is an obvious choice for me, honestly. I really want some cold on surface, yet caring and protective attitude.

File: 1763585886198818.jpg (195 KB, 1024x1002)

195 KB JPG

>>84373169
i dont care just tame me

File: 1751540015580.jpg (420 KB, 1920x1080)

420 KB JPG

>>84373169
Option 2 without
>Forthrightly feminist
would be perfect. I don't like politics in relationship/bed at all...

>>84373169
If 2 marries me and has my children that's almost perfect
I'm not sure why hating PIV
Whatever
I'm going to blow my brains out anyways

>>84377182
What kind of femdom stuff do you guys do? Asking for science.

>>84378710
By bdsm standards we're pretty vanilla. By normalfag standards we're degenerate weirdos. Anyway, stuff we do at least once a week:
>cock and ball bondage
>foot worship
>sissy play (with quite a bit of humiliation)
>bondage (getting tied up and pegged)
>orgasm control (vibrators are amazingly versatile and truly unisex toys)
>face sitting, ofc
When we have more time together (aka when the kid is out to grandparents) we get a bit more creative. She dresses up as a boss and dresses me in a slutty outfit and do roleplay.
Since I'm a bit estrogenized, it works out great two weeks a month when she's just slightly hornier than me, enough to make the fantasy realistic for both of us. Generally she gets to cum 3 times and I get to cum once. Which is just right.

>>84373169
Option 1
This way she will satisfy my penis envy kink fantasies and I will tease her until she hump my butt out of pure hate and frustration <3

>>84379264
>pegged
Nice. Is her cock bigger than yours?

>>84379528
She's a woman, anon. Did you miss the part we also have a kid together? She uses a strap on.
And no, she uses a strap on about as big as my dick (okay, maybe slightly bigger now as my dick shrank a bit) because the point is to have fun safely. Huge dildo up one's ass are a porn thing. IRL most people (men or women) can't really take that without severe risks of injury.
It took about a year until we figured out how she can bone me missionary and also enjoy herself.

>>84379269
>You go to sleep after a long day of posting your penis envy fetish slop
>You wake up in the middle of the night, feeling a hand grab your arm and a sharp pain in said arm
>You struggle a bit, but you quickly feel your brain getting foggier. Before you know you're falling asleep, as a female voice whispers "be a good boy and stay put, anon".
>You wake up in a strange room, tied to a bed. You feel a weird numbness to your lower abdomen and crotch. Your captor is a beautiful woman, sitting beside the bed.
>"Oh anon I'm glad you woke up. My name is Nona. I've been reading your posts for the longest time. I know this may be creep you out, but I think I'm in love with you. I'm sorry I took you by surprise, but it was the only way to give you my gift. But I'll show you in due time, now go back to sleep".
>As she says the last sentence, she approaches you with a syringe and I jects something in your arm. You suddenly feel drowsy and fall back to sleep again.
>"Oh anon, I'm sorry I kept you asleep for so long"

>>84379878
>Nona is standing next to the bed. You have no idea how long you've been there, but you've briefly woken up more times than you could count, only for her to out you back to sleep immediately.
>"Now that it's fully healed, I'm ready to give you my gift."
>She grabs your sheets and pulls them back
>"Here look, now you can feel it too"
>She's pointing at your crotch. You look down. Where your penis used to be. Only a smooth scar remains. A hole in the middle of it is what's left of your urethra
>"I surgically removed your penis anon. I studied for months in order to learn how to do it. I did it just for you. Now we can be envious together, isn't it great?"
>You want to scream, but you realize there's duct tape on your mouth.
>Meanwhile Nona starts undressing. Even in your panicked state, you can't help but notice how sexy she is
>She straddles you. Her pussy is soaking wet, dripping on your crotch
>See anon, I didn't take your balls, so that you could still get horny for me. Think about it. Don't you wish you could penetrate me right now?"
>As she says this she leans back, giving you a better view of her pussy. Then she starts rubbing it atop your now smooth crotch. You can feel the wetness and the heat. Holy shit are you actually getting horny in this predicament?
>"I bet you're jealous anon. Any other man could penetrate me right now. He could take out his penis and fill up this needy hole. All you have is a smooth crotch instead. Aren't you envious?"
>Damn, she's right. You wish you could penetrate her. You want to cry, but you're also horny as fuck.
>"Luckily, one of us can still penetrate the other"
>As she says this, she gets down from the bed and opens a drawer. She fishes out a strap on and starts wearing it.
>"Pretty soon you're gonna be jealous of me anon. Isn't it wonderful? Now stay out while I flip you over"

>>84379880
it would be hotter if we had the tech to attach your penis to her body

I'm just here to read the seething foids & troons, keep em' coming.

File: c38c903eeeb4141270494797d(...).jpg (1.41 MB, 2453x2880)

1.41 MB JPG

>>84379948
this thread is 100% submissive straight male and noone is pretending otherwise

>>84379549
are you visibly feminine? what hairstyle do you wear?

>>84379880
So... she "owns" me by putting me at the same level of every women? Really?
I guess women really are at the bottom genitally...

File: 1728537971649.jpg (74 KB, 600x600)

74 KB JPG

>>84373169
Option 2, option 2, option 2...

>>84379961
Nah, there's some seethoids too.

>>84373169
I wouldn't actually want femdom relationship, even if it's the fantasy one without cuckoldry. Anything beyond switch is unsustainable and carries massive risk.

>>84379948
i am actually happy too see this thread is still going on
>>84380885
kek what are they even made about?

File: prt2.jpg (22 KB, 686x386)

22 KB JPG

Growing up with shit like picrel has basically doomed me into yearning for option 2 my entire life.

>>84380944
Submissive man in bedroom bad or something, usual foid seething anytime they have to do something.

>>84373169
>Submissive males
You mean transgenders and faggots

>>84381801
>usual foid seething anytime they have to do something.
That's so true and some women won't complain when they would just lay down and the guy does most of the work but seethe the moment they have to give a hand job/blow job