>>84380001
you can't search rape porn anymore
it's not what it used to be

Id love to see a source on the actual demographics. Impossible to figure out mind since christcucks are bound to lie about one thing or the other if asked

>>84380001
So how are web visits measured in this context? I'm sure most people assume 62 million different guys somehow knew what this site is and sat down at a computer to visit it.
Doesn't seem realistic considering I've never heard of this site and assuming most people haven't.

>>84380001
Oh god
I remember motherless

It's amusing how some "people" are so retarded that they think religion is the only way to get what they consider morals. Zero pattern recognition or critical thinking skills.

>>84380071
One cannot rationally propose morality without necessarily appealing to a higher authority.

>>84380078
And you just assume because you're too retarded to do it everyone must be?

That tracks actually, this is a common issue of frogs in the well that can't understand anything but their tiny confines.

>>84380078
How do you even define a higher authority in the first place? Surely you'd also need a higher authority to tell you who the higher authority is right? At some point it's up to you to decide what counts as a higher authority, and if you can make that judgement, why can't you make other judgements for yourself also?

>>84380095
Then go ahead. Propose a framework for rational morality without invoking any sort of higher authority.
>>84380099
>truth: something exists
>truth: something cannot come from nothing
>therefore: something has always existed
>this "something" is what all mankind calls God
There you go, rational proof for God's existence. If you disagree, explain exactly where I am wrong.

>>84380134
you should read at least one philosophy book. maybe just half of one. at least a page

File: 1770021455655218.png (586 KB, 500x500)

586 KB PNG

>>84380001
>62 million MEN
FTFY

>>84380078
Is that why clergymen get caught molesting children all the time?

>>84380134
This retard really thinks he can type truth: and something will be true.
>truth: I am god

You lack the ability to understand how much you don't know
>therefore: you cannot progress beyond retarded

>>84380134
NTA but I'm an atheist and a woman of strong moral conviction. Right and wrong don't have to come from a belief in a higher power. I don't hold myself to a high standard and try to be a good person to appease some deity who will punish me after I die if I do bad things to people. I try to be a good person because you and I and everyone else are equals. I don't want you to hurt me, and I don't want me to hurt you. I believe the world would be a better place if everyone strictly followed the golden rule, but unfortunately, someone had to go and write the Talmud and fuck everything up.

>>84380001
Why are white American males so rapey?

>>84380134
The third premise is wrong, "things" don't exist and never have and never will, they are just appearances, like a picture. The second premise is also wrong, things don't come from somewhere, they come from nowhere. When you have a thought, does it come from anywhere, or does it arise spontaneously? Let's go further, even there's "contact" with any sense, like you hear something, does the pure sense of that object come from anywhere, or does it just arise spontaneously? Sure, things have a "why" for existing, certain conditions need to be present for a thing to be, but the arising of the thing itself is literally coming from nowhere. It sounds like you're using Parmenides argument, who was wrong. He was wrong because he assumed that because something exists by definition that this somehow means that it exists ultimately.

>>84380205
He might be a retard but so are you

>>84380219
>atheist and a woman
Post the inside of your panties

>>84380177
>62 million visitors to motherless
nigga i went on motherless for onlyfans leaks, doesn't make me a rapist

>>84380171
Sorry, you never explained where I was wrong. Try to defend your own viewpoint (what even is your viewpoint) if you want to be taken seriously.
>>84380185
You're correct. All men have fallen to sin, save for Jesus Christ the Redeemer. There is not one of us who is perfect.
>>84380205
You also failed to point out where I was wrong. See my reply to >>84380171. Absolutely pathetic, but I shouldn't be surprised considering this board has a drug use general running 24/7.
>>84380219
>I try to be a good person because you and I and everyone else are equals.
You do believe in a higher power then, that of Equality, which the Founders of the US deified when they wrote about it in the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence.
You might not worship Yahweh or the Demiurge in a literal sense, but you do believe in a higher power. Ask yourself this: where does Equality come from? Do we earn it, or are we born with it? Should not animals also be equal to humans, are they not also born just like us?

>>84380134
>Something cannot come from nothing
True nothing has never been observed so this is unprovable. The vacuum of space has all sorts of things in it, and relation to something also prevents something from being nothing. True nothing would mean no time and now laws of physics, and this has never been seen. Something existing could well be proof that at some point in our history, something came from nothing at least once. If you take it to be true that before something there was nothing, and now there is something, therefore something must have come from nothing.
>therefore: something has always existed
Not necessarily. A something might just make another something and then die or go away, there just needs to be a chain of cause and effect after the first something. Something can come from something else.
>this "something" is what all mankind calls God
That's a huge leap. How do we know that the something that has always existed is called God by all mankind? Where does always existing imply it has any authority today? This would make sense if all mankind called the entire universe god, but they don't. Mankind calls a great variety of things god.

>>84380219
You sound mostly good but considering everyone equals is honestly self sabotage. They don't consider YOU equal, they want you dead. Pajeets want to scam you, browns want to replace you. They are not the same type of human. I know it's easy to fall into the trap of thinking others must think like you, but they most certainly do not. Words are merely tools to deceive others to them, they only play by our white societal rules because they are forced to in order to get anything done. If it were up to them we would be dead.

File: tumblr_o5h9gaikTb1tu1beso1_640.jpg (55 KB, 640x360)

55 KB JPG

>>84380234
>The third premise is wrong, "things" don't exist and never have and never will, they are just appearances, like a picture.
Where is this "appearance" found? How can we see it? Surely it must be somewhere. Or are you arguing there is no such thing as space or time either?
>>84380258
>If you take it to be true that before something there was nothing
I don't. God transcends time, space, and Human understanding. That's why he's (or it's) called God.
>Where does always existing imply it has any authority today?
God has authority over all of us because he is beyond our understanding. This is what the cult of science is not willing to accept, and it's what makes 99% of them atheists and only 1% of them great scientists.

>>84380244
>I only went to steal to the place where rapists hang out

>>84380307
name one place where rapists don't hang out. and it's not stealing, it's piracy

>>84380036
it's a reasonably big porn site
what this article elides is that, being a reasonably big site, it has a shitton of categories and most users aren't even aware it hosts sleep stuff, or if they are, don't click on it
it's like calling 4chan a gay porn site because of /y/ and /hm/

>>84380001
This is the "SA" site they were talking about? A generic porn site which happens to host questionable content? Not only that, it's 62 million visits, not 62 million men. The chat associated chat group only has 1000 members.

>>84380285
I don't. God transcends time, space, and Human understanding. That's why he's (or it's) called God.
Great, but that has nothing to do with what you said earlier. Why bother even saying that something can't come from nothing if you're just going to say God transcends both concepts anyway? God can just make something come from nothing regardless of if it can or can't happen. Feels disengenuous.
>God has authority over all of us because he is beyond our understanding.
Oh I see, so the thing you said earlier was just a metaphor. God doesn't make sense in the same way that that logical sequence doesn't make sense. This shows that since we don't understand either of them we should just shut up and so what they say.

>>84380001
Dude pastors are constantly being arrested for sex crimes.

>>84380285
Appearance=location. A thing appears because it's spatial, temporal, because it has boundaries, those are not absolute though. Even though they're not absolute, we can still meaningfully talk about them in the same way we could talk about a movie or a painting. A movie or a painting seems like it has "things", that it has depth, that something is happening, we know in reality though that there are no things, there is no depth, and nothing is happening, it's all just an appearance. This isn't to say things don't exist as they appear, rather, they are illusory. Another example I can give to illustrate this is that I watched a short once that I thought was "real" at first but it was revealed later on it was just the reflection on a car. Now with the understanding that it's just a reflection I could suddenly tell it is illusory, there's still a reflection, it is just known it doesn't ultimately exist.
>Or are you arguing there is no such thing as space or time either?
Yes, a what people mean by "thing" is really that it is spatial-temporal. That it has volume/dimension and it changes. This is where Parmenides is correct but where he also goes wrong, he's right that change doesn't exist, but he thinks it's that it's somehow that no thing existing incoherent, when it's actually the opposite, to think things actually exist is incoherent because things are such because they change. No change, no things. I think the best logical, irrefutable proof for this is the fact that it a thing has limits, yet can be infinitely divisible, that it's not really a thing. Only a finite amount of parts could equal a finite whole yet if any space is full of infinity, and every moment an eternity, then space and time are just mental constructs, and boundaries are imagined.

>>84380307
Are you aware of what website you're posting on right now? This place is chock full of pedos. Does that make you a pedo? How about a mass shooter? Plenty of those posted here too.

>>84380428
I don't come here to illegally access content from creators.

>>84380078
>You can't be good for goodness sake
>You have to do it for Sky Daddy
I treat people nicely and do what I know is right because I want strangers to have a positive opinion on me. It's really not complicated.

>>84380452
Doesn't matter what you're coming here for, moron. You're still sharing the site with a bunch of pedos and freaks.

>>84380425
Btw phone posting that's why there are errors