[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 20260104_160500.jpg (27 KB, 500x500)
27 KB JPG
Introverts don't exist. What exist is lack of interest on others
I talked a lot, but after I noticed that everyone is a subhuman nigger, I barely talk, since there's no point
>>
>>84396861
i'm skeptical since some dumb shit like this comes out every year but new research seems to corroborate that "introverts" simply do not feel as rewarded by social interaction as extroverts. the claim that introverts do not exist depends on the definition.
>>
>>84396907
>Lack of interest in others
>Don't feel as rewarded by social interactions as a result
I don't see the contradiction there
>>
>>84396861
I think theres a correlation between introversion and lack of interest but theyre not the same.

I have no interest in normies but I also have no interest in talking about my interests or things generally even when I do have a likeminded person.
>>
>>84396920
there isn't one. both are part of what usually is referred to as introversion.
>>
>>84396861
You fucking modern pop psyche nigger, introversion IS the lack of interest in the external object, because the "libido"(Jung) is moving away from them and towards and inner factors instead.

Of course, what people are trying to say usually is that absolute introverts or extraverts do not exist, so it's something that can be more or less pronounced in an individual.
And finally, it's affected by the law of enantiodromia: a strongly repressed extraversion can eventually erupt into a subject who was previously extremely introverted, and all the inadequacy will be felt at once. Sometimes this sends the subject into a wild goose chase of "becoming an extravert", but that's not how integration works.
>>
Plausible
>>
Technically speaking though, if you start with a positive attitude towards [external objects] but grow disillusioned due to bad experience, then your actual Type is more likely to be extraverted.

The introvert would do the opposite, he starts either uninterested, pessimistic, mistrustful, fearful etc. towards [external objects] but might cool down or feel attracted all of a sudden.
And it's important to note that his initial attitude isn't driven by bad experiences, for the introvert this feels like just the most natural way to be, he might not even get how the hell the extravert can naturally function otherwise, usually projecting and assuming secret aims or desires behind extraverted behavior(which might exist, but for the genuine extravert they are barely conscious or completely secondary).
>>
File: file.png (230 KB, 736x710)
230 KB PNG
>>84396861
>5 doesn't exist. What exists is 2+3!
>I noticed that everyone is a subhuman nigger
Does OP know...
>>
File: file.png (115 KB, 400x400)
115 KB PNG
>>84397865
>>84397865
You did not need to explain Jung to tell OP he is retarded. Only tiktok foids who need to go back feel the need to infodump in order to be entitled to anything. Please shut the fuck up and go away.
>>
>>84397865
You are just a spiritualist with extra steps
>>
>>84398604
For how much I like my magical girls, not really.

>>84398597
OP asked about introversion, I gave him the proper definition.
Why must everything be a worthless shitpost where nothing is ever gained, other than a quick dopamine rush of calling somebody retarded over the internet? You are exactly what you claim to hate.
>>
File: file.png (444 KB, 964x1090)
444 KB PNG
>>84398642
>OP asked
>I gave him the proper definition
It's always the retarded foids from tiktok who are worried about the "proper definition" of anything, even to the point of claiming someone asked for it. How could you call for proper definitions while you twist OP's words? Are you retarded, or a narcissist?
>>
>>84398762
You going to provide any real answer to the thread, or just to bitch somebody else did it better before you? Rhetorical question, of course.
>>
>>84398770
I already did, you're just too brain damaged from your zoomer retardation program to retain any information at all. Uninstall your shitty app or go back.
>>
File: 137364905_p0.jpg (1.11 MB, 1600x1200)
1.11 MB JPG
Bump because the talk of introverted and extraverted types is always interesting, even if I understand we aren't even close to using the same definitions.
I'm sure there might be some anons who took it more seriously at one point in their lives or at least wonders what even Psychological Types is truly about.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.