[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: sumi-2.png (1.09 MB, 1920x1080)
1.09 MB PNG
Reading Marx and Marcuse is too difficult. Who can possibly be able to read them?
>>
>>84430249
Jews brainwashing jews.
>>
>>84430306
rightoids will say shit like this as if their entire ideology isn't based on /pol/ and xitter memes
>>
>>84430249
>filtered by leftist wordcel shit
NGMI
>>
the only difficult marx work is grudrisee. he's actually readable. adoorknob and the gang are jargon however
>>
>>84430249
And who can possibly learn several difficult classical piano pieces? Tons of people it turns out. Humans can do shit. You have to be a bit smart, but more importantly you have to know how to go about it and accept that it's going to be work.
>>
>>84430249
why would you want to read such a low IQ racist though? that's unironically problematic, anon
>>
>reading philosophy
No one except autists want to read a 200+ diatribe with 20 letter made up words just to say something that can be said in 2 pages. It makes you look like a brainlet who thinks he is smart.
>>
>>84430340
What about the Economical and Philosophical Manuscripts?

>>84430351
It's not like I'm reading by option, but I won't lie, I'm liking the little bit I can understand of the work. The marxian concept of alienation is interesting.
>>
>>84430403
>reading by option
Apparently this expression doesn't exist in english. I wanted to say that it's not like I choose to read it. Hope it's clearer now.
>>
Old books are just like that. Some stuff in a given time period will be more or less a certain way, but the style and vocabulary generally clusters. Basically git gud through more exposure to works on related matters from the same time period.
>>
>>84430403
>What about the Economical and Philosophical Manuscripts?
Marx is a bad philosopher because he says that matter does not endure a change, contra Aristotle. Disagreeing with Aristotle is BIG bad. But no, that's not a particularly hard book to read based on a very cursory glance.
>>
I'm in my great refusal of the technological system, that's all i know about marcuse.
>>
>>84430563
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-Dimensional_Man
he's actually famous for this though. maybe that's your joke
>>
>>84430579
https://youtu.be/uD4L8kn6CMU

Yeah, i'm just a slave to my comfort but i'm working on it.
>>
It's kind of like a praise of folly night.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.