>Types in a few words >Generates slop>I'm a great artistWhy are AI fags like this?
>>84439045only an absolute retard would ignore generative AI, it's a valuable asset for any artist. Even if you draw things yourself, there are some excellent inpainting models out there for edits and they're only going to get better.
When you're soulless and talentless even the sloppiest derivative trash seems amazing to you. Art is art because it reflects a human soul. Even as a tool to assist real artists it only cheapens their creation. The feeling of inauthenticity is hard to miss.
>>84439045why his ai slop and not anyone else's?
>>84439045Good AI art takes creativity to make. If you think most AI art actually looks good you have bad taste.
>>84439121It's dunning kruger unironically. They're like younger me when I started playing guitar and I thought I was pretty good after a month because it *kinda* started sounding like something.
>>84439144yeah. the things ive seen online made with ai that were actually good, actually took a lot of work and hundreds of generations and human edititing to turn it into a polished final result
>>84439135That's just how delusional they are
>>84439045AI art sucks out of a few particular use cases where you need a specifically uncanny.
>>84439164It is, the nature of AI pushes you to do that though. Even the great investments in search of AGI are the same retarded delusion of what if I shake this magic 8 ball supercomputer and it gives me the key to the universe.It sucks we had to live the retarded lifetime of playing with le black box
>>84439045>Why are AI fags like this?Why are non AI fags like this?Nothing objectively makes AI art better or worse than the works of da vinci.>>84439176This is also true. Not all ai art is created equally.>>84439121>When you're soulless>Art is art because it reflects a human soul.You need to establish your premise that souls exist before you make claims like this.Where is your proof that there are these "souls", and if you are not referring to some paranormal phenomenon but rather an abstraction of human thought, how is that abstraction superior to any other?
>>84439460>Even the great investments in search of AGI are the same retarded delusion of what if I shake this magic 8 ball supercomputer and it gives me the key to the universe.It's not nearly so simple.You clearly do not understand how to use AI if you are simply asking it magic 8 ball questions, which are effectively Boolean.
I was watching a low budget horror movie and didn't catch on that they were using AI until I realized that the quality of the special effects outpaced the low budget.https://www.lookmovie2.to/movies/play/36841098-bone-keeper-2026Just skip around a bit for the monster parts. Point is this shit is definitely gonna become standard use.
>>84439045It's a gold rush to whoever figures out how to make it not look like ai anymore but have that human soul in it that we instantly recognize it as human made not ai. That's what he means, the art of deception of the human soul. By then we'll not even care, it will be that good.
>>84440568We are already there though. Hirohiko Araki said he found AI art based on his style and honestly thought it was some old work he forgot about. If a master manga artist is tricked by AI, its the AI has figured out soul.
>>84440529Souls don't exist but ai art is not art, i dont exactly know how to define art but it has to be from a human. nobody really likes it or connects with ai art, the people who like it are mindless fruit love island normies and the people who push it are only trying to make money. there is virtually no point and a massive downside. so it should not exist, i cant imagine someone arguing otherwise if they care about the good of the world.
>>84440608>i dont exactly know how to define art but it has to be from a human.If you cannot define art, you cannot exclude ai art from it.And as AI was created by humans, used by humans and crawls for learning data based on the output of humans, AI art is most certainly human created.>nobody really likes it or connects with ai artI like it. I connect with it.>the people who like it are mindless fruit love island normies and the people who push it are only trying to make money.You obviously haven't spent time on /AI DEGENerated/ threads on /b/ if you honestly believe that.>there is virtually no point and a massive downside.I alone can think of plenty of use cases, and you have yet to establish this "massive downside".>i cant imagine someone arguing otherwise if they care about the good of the world.Oh yeah, I don't care about that.Caring about the good of the world is fucking gay.
