Good job, bitches. Thanks for destroying the societal superstructure that allowed civilization to function by driving down wages, taking jobs away from men, and turning beta bucks basedboys into NEET incels because you don't need to fuck them now that you have your girl boss job.
What successful country bans women from working
>>84473434foids were banned from the professions until the 1970s, dumbass
>>84473397>Oh cool are you going to stop simping for them and giving them validation?>You:......I didn't say all that I still want a gf ...
>>84473397The one silver lining of AI annihilating the job market will be the erasure of all these jewish day care positions.
>>84473397Surely this means women will be stepping up to be providers, right?After all, what women wanted was equality, not just increasingly more loaded ATMs to extract resources from, right?
>>84473651If only men figured this shit out. But that'll never happen.
>>84473397>>84473434Literally everything is worse now than it was pre 1970s. Nigs outta control, horrific build quality on 99% of items, terrible food quality, etc. Women ruin and weaken every industry theyre in. Whatever job some woman is doing if a man were there instead hed be doing it better.
>>84473640Nah, women were basically all grandfathered in after the world wars to fill in for moids who abandoned their posts
>>84474862>>84473640Okay so zero countries. Just wanted to make sure.>>84473957The layoffs "due to AI" are fake but even then they're almost all for tech jobs which are 98% male
>>84474962yeah when i say professions i mean like lawyers n' shit, not factory work>>84474992>there was never a successful country before the 1970slmao
>>84474996No successful countries ban women from working. That's just a fact. Countries in the past don't count.
>>84475048oh, so you weren't saying "no country that bans women working could ever be successful" or "no successful country in the history of the world has ever banned women working", you were just saying some insanely pedantic, trivial nonsense. fine
>>84475096Explain why no successful country is even remotely close to considering banning women from working
>>84475161>Explain why no successful country is even remotely close to considering slaveryThis is how you soundYou seriously think if trump decided to go full kkk overnight and bring back slavery of unemployed blacks it wouldnt be economically beneficial?You've got your causes and effects mixed up
>>84475161capitalists love a doubling of the labour supply and anything that subverts the unity of the lower classes. the last time it was attempted, in egypt in 2013, the army overthrew the muslim brotherhood because arab nationalists didn't want their business interests threatened and because they were enemies of the muslim brotherhood since the 50s
