[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1740279362197.png (290 KB, 514x645)
290 KB PNG
I've already seen anons calling people with some random great jewish grandparent a jew, and it seems like even Israel sees their race that way once you can get a citzenship there just by having jewish ancestry. Why do people only act that way towards jews, after all? You don't really see it towards other races.
>>
whoever the white man considers a jew, is a jew. You're a jew, I'm a jew, we're all jews. The table he stubs his toe against is also a jew.
>>
>>84486222
I'm more interested in the opinions of the anons who are really jewish without a doubt, who they consider a jew and who they don't.
>>
>>84486205
I'm 1% jewish by blood and I'd say ancestry makes you a jew
>>
File: 1483222226645.jpg (156 KB, 1920x1080)
156 KB JPG
>>84486293
And why does that rule only apply to jewish ancestry?
>>
File: (((jewish supremacy))).jpg (491 KB, 1143x2048)
491 KB JPG
>>84486338
because jews are born with pure souls, and goyim are born with impure souls
>>
>>84486378
I think you're just larping, but I know there are people who really think that way. In that worldview, do these spiritual leaders really think that a person who had only one jewish ancestor centuries ago is superior to someone who didn't have any?
>>
File: 1628796483031.jpg (143 KB, 1239x1255)
143 KB JPG
>>84486205
>What really makes someone a jew?

Blood, whenever jews donate blood or receive blood from non-jews they become slightly less jewish.
>>
>>84486414
I wouldn't know what an orthodox jew would think, but if I had to guess they would probably think of a higher jewish % by blood would mean you're more a jew. That, or they really only care about whether or not you're a jew in their immediate community.
>>
File: 1777726033407717.jpg (170 KB, 850x852)
170 KB JPG
>>84486441
That makes me wonder id orthodox jews have an oath of not donating blood lol
>>84486445
Just saw your filename. Are you a /pol/fag?
>>
>>84486522
what would you consider a /pol/fag, someone who believes in hitler or just someone who browses the board? because i, as well as a bunch of jewish rabbi over in isreal, just browse the board.
>>
>>84486564
I usually use the term for someone who believes in Hitler's ideas. If you did I'd ask you what you consider a jew, since the opinion that if you have a single drop of jewish blood in your veins you're a jew is more associated with nazis.
>>
>>84486585
well jews and nazis are both leftists so that's understandable
>>
File: Kaguya doubt.jpg (74 KB, 1024x1024)
74 KB JPG
>>84486617
>well jews and nazis are both leftists
>>
>>84486625
Nazis are woke and Jews are liberals (unless they're zionists, then they're woke)
>>
>>84486648
I think the political chart we use to define what comes from the leftist/right-wing agenda is outdated at this point. For example, usually I see people putting communism in the corner of the red square, nazism in the corner of the blue square, anarcho-capitalism in the corner of the purple square and something I don't remember in the corner of the green square. But for example, how can communism be anti hierarchy like it says in picrel? And what does pro/anti-innovation mean? Also, most commie leaders hated POC so how can they be woke?
>>
File: 1758581399267633.jpg (59 KB, 847x513)
59 KB JPG
>>84486685
I wouldn't say it's outdated, it's just people with blatant biases trying to push propaganda so then their side of the politics war looks better than the other side. People just play football politics rather than attributing things to how they really are.
Communism and Nazis are both woke, but Nazis are more center-progressive and somewhat on the left side meanwhile communism is basically touching the edge of the political spectrum on the left.
With Communism and the Nazis, they both completely demolished their political enemies and left them no ability to fairly fight back against them in the law-abiding political world. They're both anti-hierarchy because they don't respect the method to gain power, they only abuse it so then they can stay in power.
Pro/anti-innovation is pretty self-explanatory, the nazis wanted eugenics, the new right wants to push pro-ai stuff, the liberals are the people you see on the internet who say they hate ai all the time, and the conservatives are the ones who want 1940s traditional values in society still.
And if you look at the left in how they engage themselves, they always eat each other alive all the time. You can see this with streamer culture, Hasan vs Ethan was a woke versus a liberal and they hated each others guts to the point that Hasan's community sent Ethan death threats. Back in the Nazi days, they were a socialist party but still wiped out other socialist parties and all of the communist parties. The nuance of what you're pushing for when you're on the left has to be very specific or else there will be constant infighting all the time.
>>
>>84486205
>"great jewish grandparent"
>not "jewish great grandparent"
DIE KIKE DIE
>>
File: 1777266209236555.png (632 KB, 605x664)
632 KB PNG
>>84486776
You're right when you say people just like to play football politics instead of discussing fairly, and I'm not really that much against the idea that nazism and communism come from the left, since both have their origins in socialism, but I don't think I agree with the definition of anti-hierarchy here. If I'm not mistaken there's even a quote of Hitler saying that the german soldiers obey their leaders faithfully because they know when they reach such positions, they will also be obeyed, so it's not really a lack of respect to the method to gain power but rather an opposition to the multiplurality of ideas. I see the authoritarianism more as a form of over-attachment to hierarchy.
Also, aren't liberals pro things like drugs and abortion? Isn't this a "pro-innovation" characteristic?
>>84486858
Oh, you're right lol. My bad.
>>
>>84486901
>it's not really a lack of respect to the method to gain power but rather an opposition to the multiplurality of ideas
yeah that's what i was trying to allude to in my explanation
drugs and abortion seem more anti-responsibility in my mind and don't really have that much relevance to innovation. you're not innovating by being a drug addict or killing a child, you're just getting a free pass to do whatever you want. with liberals they like to screech about respecting the need to tip them based on values, or to pay for their shitty art online while refusing ai stuff, so they seem pretty anti-innovation to me.
>>
>>84486205
By the standards of National Socialist Germany, you were totally fine if your great grandparents were Jewish, you'd be a "Mischling" if 1-2 grandparents were Jewish (second and first degree). 3 or more Jewish grandparents means you were Jewish yourself. If your standards are more extreme than Nazi Germany, you've got a mental condition.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.