>muh good writing Who cares? If I like it, I like it. If I don't like it, I don't like it. Simple as
I like good writing only
>>84517965You're allowed to like something and think it can be improved.
>>84517965butthurt one piece fan ?
good writing is almost as funny as worth reading
>>84517979>muh improvement Then it wouldn't be the thing that you liked to begin. That's also I don't understand fans who create a whole other timeline where the "plot holes" and "bad decisions" aren't made. I'm 99% sure that if that was the original, you won't even like it anymore, or at least like it way less than the "flawed" piece
>>84517971define "good writing"
>>84517992lmao, are you sub90iq or something? holy jesus, i hope people don't actually interact with things this way.
>>84517992Gamers do that often too>game comes out>you like it but request a billion "improvements" for the sequel>the company follows the fan base desire and implement those "improvements" in the next game>most people still prefer the original and even dislike the new one
>>84517992>Then it wouldn't be the thing that you liked to beginNo, it would be the thing I like but better. Are you stupid?
>>84517965It's encapsulated midwittery. First that good writing can't even be defined, it's purely a consensus
>>84518000writing that is good
Writing is retarded to begin. You can twist words however you want to mean whatever you want