are guys into lesbo stuff?? like if you had a crush on a girl and you saw her making out w a girl would you watch?? or better yes, would you let ur gf cuck you with another girl?
>>84585418***yet im retarded
>>84585418no I don't think so. I still would be pissed off, maybe a little less than if it were a guy but still.
>>84585418lesbo stuff does nothing for memost of the time I jerk it to solo female, sometimes to guy on girl, and basically never to girl on girlcucking is cucking, I wouldn't like it no matter the gender of the person who I'm getting cucked by
>>84585418>would you let ur gf cuck you with another girl?only if she lets me cuck her with another man.in fact, we are "negotiating" something like this with another "straight" couple. we're both bisexual.
>>84585418No, that's utterly repulsive. I'd lose any attraction I had for her.
>>84585450i'm a bi girl and i would so let my bf cuck me w another man. hot as hell.
>>84585473yeah, my wife is also on that wavelength.basically we've both been craving same sex action for two years now and we're finally figuring out a way to do it safely (i.e. with a couple we both know).I just hope she won't be too weirded if she sees it. Women oftentimes say they want something but then aren't particularly happy when they get it.
>>84585515yeah i think our fantasies are less immersive than we believe sometimes. i've been comfortable with something in my mind then noped outta the real deal. not really sure why that is.
>>84585418>like if you had a crush on a girl and you saw her making out w a girl would you watchyes>or better yet, would you let ur gf cuck you with another girl?no waythreesomes only
>>84585540oh yeah i forgot about those. that doesn't feel authentically lesbo though.
>>84585526yeah, well, i've been with men before and she's been with women before. So we'll start with just separate "encounters" since we already agree that she needs female attention and I need male attention.
>>84585418>would you let ur gf cuck you with another girl?Only if she played into my cuckold fetish with some verbal humiliation desu.
>>84585578i wish i could find a bisexual boyfriend.
>>84585601that makes you very rare. most women are utterly icked if they find out their guy took dick before.
>>84585418>would you let ur gf cuck you with another girl?i fatasize this more than actually having a gf, am i weird?
>>84585618i don't get how that'd be emasculating at all, probably because im not remotely homophobic. take dick, give dick... i don't give a fuck.
>>84585633a little. but i've heard weirder.
>>84585643yeahhelp me find a gf and you can take first dibs
>>84585418>are guys into lesbo stuff??>*describes cuckoldry*
>>84585679okay then, let's start over. are guys into lesbo stuff?? by that i mean you transition into a girl and make out with a girl. faggot
>>84585706>are you into lesbo stuff??>*describes tranny x-change fetishism*
>>84585731maybe the real lesbo stuff is in your heart, anon.
what ders anon think of this story?
>>84585739can't "fix" people's sexuality, retard.
>>84585738You mean to ask if guys are into watching women fucking other womenThat is what lesbo stuff means
>>84585752Sexuality is a spectrum between natural and full on licentious wanton, anything taken in excess of its intended purpose will be dysfunctional But it's like saying you can't "fix" an obese person's appetite, that's probably true, but it's not inherently true, if you had the means you could probably persuade them to stop their excesses
>>84585781i meant it in the context i said. obviously men like lesbo porn check any adult site on the net
>>84585889The context of what you said makes the lesbo part lose meaning and so it's redundant, just say "do you like cuckoldry"
>>84585790pseudointellectuals are so fucking boring. i'm not talking about degree of sexual desire, i am talking about sexual orientation. that's the more conventional definition of "sexuality." if someone is a lesbian that means they are a female with exclusive sexual attraction to other females. this cannot be "redirected."retard
>>84585914cuckholdery can be straight retard
>>84585926>pseudointellectuals are so fucking boring. That's random. Are the pseuds in the room with us? >i'm not talking about degree of sexual desire, i am talking about sexual orientation.Even if you're just rephrasing it to make it sound like there is somehow another mode of sexual reproduction for an animal's instinct to have an inclination towards, that implication can't be true, and so my point still stands. I can use words too, you know. You are either 'oriented' naturally or you are 'oriented' in an excess (or lack) of the function of your reproductive instinct. >if someone is a lesbian that means they are a female with exclusive sexual attraction to other females.Nothing in contention with what I've said. And I would even add to what you've said there, people change. It doesn't really matter the minutiae of what you're tempted by, you could be tempted to fetishize animals or cartoons or various parts of the body, like the ears, or BDSM, etc, but these are all an excess, and thus you see their dysfunction. By analogy, a vegetarian might exclusively have a diet of plants, but that doesn't change an omnivore into an herbivore, and the attrition rate of vegetarians to a more regular diet is substantial the last I checked. >retardOh yeah invoke the magic word that makes you right, nevermind, disregard what I've said. >>84585932Cuckoldry is just cuckoldry, if you're going to ask about an opinion on cuckoldry then just lead with it.
oh i see, you don't believe homosexuality is "functional." alright, well i can't change your mind on that. anyway, lesbians be lesbians.
Only bisexual pickmes would leave that.
>>84585418>are guys into lesbo stuff??I used to be when I was younger, not so much anymore>like if you had a crush on a girl and you saw her making out w a girl would you watch?No, I dont think I would>or better yet, would you let ur gf cuck you with another girl?Maybe, I have a wife and I wouldnt mind getting cucked by a hot female, just as long as I get to fuck her too or join in sometimes
>>84585418Never a partner (I'm a virgin loser, but I'm pretty sure that I would be very jealous: my love is possessive, and I would want my girlfriend to be the same).But two random sluts making out? Fuck yeah, I would love to watch (one of the hottest memories I have is seeing two model-tier girls, probably in their late teens, aggressively making out on the dancefloor of a shitty club).
>>84586185sounds pretty hot
shes gonna leave u for the chick btw
>>84585418>are guys into lesbo stuff??Yes> like if you had a crush on a girl and you saw her making out w a girl would you watch??>its kind of weird to say but yeah, the girl that I was really into was into much into men but into women. She told me this but I still liked her a lot. Then another girl-friend of mine told me that she likes the girl I like (we later bonded alot over this and became besties) so I tried setting both of my friends up(at least one of us can score) But then some other bitch tried to swoop out her mutual crush and we had to drop the plan(gotta give her some space) But one day we got into drunk like state due to lack of sleep and decided let's go all in and confess at the same time. Sadly I got hit with both food poisoning and elevated heart rate due to nervousness(i threw up).So we had to cancel the plan and realised how dumb we were for trying to break our friendship with the girl we like. So I am already a bit of a yuricuck>or better yes, would you let ur gf cuck you with another girl?Yes I don't mind, I kind of a want a fujo and himedanshi relationship"Oh you want to bang Mrs. Smith? Sure-Wait you meant Mr. Smith? DIVORCE!RIGHT NOW"and the vice versa is also applicable
>>84585418No, if I was into somebody and I saw them making out with somebody else,I'd assume they weren't into me.
>>84586079>you don't believe homosexuality is "functional."By the language we use to describe the reproductive instinct, any excess of it will be dysfunctional. For example, having no children is definitionally 'dysgenic.'>well i can't change your mind on that. corr. you can't change what it is. My mind did not manufacture the truth, I just observed it.>anyway, lesbians be lesbians.Until they aren't. Then "sExUaLiTy iS fLuId" or you're not a true scotsman. Either way, your initial point that "sexuality can't be 'fixed'" is wrong, indeed, you can fix your sexuality and align yourself to the purposes you were made for. Hope this helps. P.S. By the way, an implicit (You) is intrinsically still a (You), just like the explicit (You) I'm sending you right now is.
>>84586482ah yes, what better way to defend an argument than with quiet assumptions. you are firstly assuming that anything outside of reproduction is "excess," which doesn't align with... anything scientifically. if you had any understanding of evolutionary biology, you'd know that sexual reproduction emerged to create genetic variation (impossible w/ asexual reproduction). organisms with this system ended up outcompeting those without it, which is why sex is consistent throughout our genetic history. ignoring this, you make a normative claim about how sexuality "should" function, which is a personal opinion. Calling anything non-reproductive "excess" only makes sense if you assume reproduction is the sole function of sexual behavior... which it's not. also erogenous zones exist all throughout the body, which doesn't help your case at all.
>>84586649https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1472648310601162
>>84586649>anything outside of reproduction is "excess," which doesn't align with... anything scientifically. >if you had any understanding of evolutionary biology, you'd know that sexual reproduction emerged to create genetic variation>sex is consistent throughout our genetic historyImagine talking about "science" and "genetics" and the "function of sex" and "understanding evolution" while arguing for being a de-facto genetic dead end. You can be a homo but you don't have to be a fag about it. And calling others pseuds while being the biggest pseud around that thinks using big college gender studies words in random sequence will impress someone on a Chinese cartoon porno imageboard.
>>84586689lmao you just don't have a reply. it's okay man, you'll win the next one for sure. and hey, word of advice: don't try to start a scientific conversation without the scientific knowledge on hand... you won't get very far.
No I wouldn't want a girl that has to seek attention from other people
>>84586671Lol"Catholics dehumanize the reproductive process, whereas Judaism took a more open approach"I think the Jews literally invented stoning gays?Imagine linking to this bozo as if he's an authority on the language of my birth. >>845866491. The instinct to reproduce is meant for reproducing2. A lack of such instinct would be a shortage, and an excess of this instinct would be...an excess.>if you had any understanding of evolutionary biologyBuddy, that's far too pedantic for the scope of this discussion. My interest is in not using conflicting language to describe the phenomenon. Phrases like "sexuality is fluid" to explain away the inconsistencies will not serve. >you make a normative claim about how sexuality "should" functionI haven't done that once ITT, I'm just stating things as they are simply. >Calling anything non-reproductive "excess" only makes sense if you assume reproduction is the sole function of sexual behavior... which it's not. That is the primary function. If the secondary function exceeds the primary function, then it has become perverse and is an excess.The two main other passions/inclinations I know in the same category are for eating and for learning. When your appetite exceeds your stomach then you've become a glutton. When your knowledge exceeds your understanding then you've become a highbrow. When your horny exceeds your sexuality then you've become an adulterer. When I read these very simple concepts, I think of an obese guy, a nerd that has completely lost touch with the common man, and a divorcee. Of course, it's also possible to have skinny gluttons of delicacy, or really dumb, rather than smart, nerds (like yourself), or a virgin porn addict who is nevertheless in excess of his sexuality and an adulterer. >>84586701Word of advice, if the reply is suddenly extremely terse and not in the same style as before, it probably isn't the same anon, even if he didn't write 'nta'
>>84585418yes luv lesbian
>>84585418You can't be cucked by female-female sex.
I'd love to have a gf who flirts with, french-kisses, hugs, holds hands with and mutually masturbates with her female friends. I wouln't feel insecure about it like with hetero cucking, since I would always have something they lack. Let girls have their fun!
