[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.84587895
 No.84587895 Archived
How is the YouTube algorithm so ass? They would have to -try- to make an algorithm that bad. I can't find anything worth watching.
>>
Anonymous
 No.84587917
 No.84587917
>>84587895
It's like constantly changing so people can't figure out ways to exploit it reliably
>>
Anonymous
 No.84588008
 No.84588008
>>84587895
What do you mean
>worth
watching? Completely subjective. Here are 3 random videos/topics for you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R669l5CA1YA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOJaAM2ky_I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPTqBTm_2lk
>>
Anonymous
 No.84588014
 No.84588014
>>84587895
>>84588008
and have some music as a bonus too:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y15_F0ftT3Q
>>
Anonymous
 No.84588038
 No.84588038
for me it's the shorts that have no basis anything i can discern, but the videos are pretty accurate to my browsing and i don't even have an account
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.