Why are women like this?Fembots, care to explain?
>>84592442How would they even find this out?
41 years is a bit much for cumcakes. how'd they find out anyways.
>>84592442Once you bake them in the oven they're pretty much sterilized from diseases right?
>>84592444>>84592445One of the kids noticed the cupcakes tasted like cum, obviously.
>>84592444She couldn't suppress the urge to tell them that the secret ingredient for these cupcakes was "love" prior to making obscene movements with her tongue inside her mouth while holding eye contact a bit too long.
Absolutely the man's idea
>>84593821Disagree. Men use logic and it's not reasonable to waste nutrients on random kids.
>>84592445I looked it up and apparently her and her husband were also making pizza which explains 4 decades
>>84593821You look at that woman and tell me she hasn't also thought of raping kids at one point.
>>84594402So it's like a ~sexy~ version of Sweeney Todd?
>>84593817Probably this. Maybe not directly telling them but like everything with women she bragged to someone. Probably on reddit or something and got caught
They found out because of a separate criminal investigation.Here is how the timeline actually unfolded:The Initial Break: The husband was being investigated by state and federal authorities for entirely separate internet-related crimes and exploitation charges. The Digital Evidence: During a raid on their home, law enforcement seized their phones, laptops, and hard drives. When forensic analysts went through the digital media, they uncovered extensive video footage and photographic evidence that the couple had filmed themselves preparing the contaminated food, alongside texts discussing it.The Admission: Once confronted with the undeniable video evidence during the broader investigation, it became a core part of the state's criminal case against them, leading to her ultimate plea and 41-year sentence.
>>84594516Thanks ChatGPT for your insight into this matter
>>84594521kek it was gemini m8t
>>84594402>which explains 4 decades...does it? it's still quite a lot, all things considered. pretty sure you wouldn't get anywhere near as much if you knowingly serve someone out of date food that makes that person violently sick for an entire week (an actual death risk).
>>84592445if you found out someone put cum in your food wouldn't you immediately set about bludgeoning their face in
women sure love their baked goods huh?
>>84594578probably. but even that reaction, while understandable, still probably wouldn't be justifiable from a legal perspective.
>>84594538They're all the same AI, just rebranded.
>>84594594My best guess is that they pissed of someone on the higer ups really badly. Maybe some politician who have grandkids going into those school or so.
>>84594594the law has to take into account common reactions by the victims of crime or they'd be prosecuting both victim and criminal over and over
>>84592442How did you determine every woman is like that? I'm just trying to understand
