has life ever been more hopeless than it was in the past? the billionaires and epstein mfers own everything and everyone else is a poor slave
>>84596097From what I understand, humans were fairly egalitarian before the advent of agriculture, which gave rise to the concept of accumulation. One family monopolized most of the land while the peasants worked. And that same family continues to hold power and grow richer
>>84596211tribal monkey stuff
>he thinks that a small group of people monopolizing an entire portion of the earth is newever heard of the habsburgs
That's just you being retarded, we live in the best time ever for humanity.The resentment shows you want to be a billionaire, own everything and become a problem for everyone else, you would be part of the problem.
>>84596502the best time ever lmao
>>84596211>>84596502These are revisionist memes perpetuated by the same cabbalah of retards who perpetuate "50% of men didn't reproduce" or whateverTruth is if you read contemporary books and accounts, you'd realize disease, poverty, starvation etc were much more localized and less widespread than you'd think watching pop history on youtube or listening to these disingenuous ratsAdjusted for childhood mortality humans had the same lifespan as we do now (inb4 some weakling shitter died who cares as if you're content being a survivor)The only thing we surpass all humans to ever live in is entertainement. But by any other metric like health and nutrition, possibility to climb up ranks in society, freedom, sexual and social fulfillement... Even cavemen mog us. Actually, cavemen and WHG especially mog us
>>84596097you live better than most kings in history. stop whining
>>8459685050% of men didn't reproduce though. we know this for a fact.
>>84596097I'm glad because the poor people are equally reprehensible if not worse than muh epstein and would do the same shit anyway if they had the resources. Epstein is actually better than most of humanity since he basically pioneered the transhumanist movement for the past 20 years, and now we're closer than ever before to completely transcending the human condition.
>>84596992Again it's entirely based off a misreprensation of data by a psychologist iirc some behavior sciences retard concluding that because the non-adjusted just for child mortality lifespans were low that means most people didnt live to that age ergo didnt reproduce. Truth is people fucked at extremely young age (part of the reason why the initial figures are skewed since younger girls have hard time with pregnancies), it's also a projection of modern dating dynamicsEvery single autosomal, y-dna or even mitochondrial large scale genetic study btfos this. Anthropology btfo this considering the population growths. Archeology and history btfos this considering not even wars would put such a dent on the male population out of all people (he also conveniently disregards the fact that disease and wars kill everyone lmao no is spared)It's not a "fact" you're just naive or want to believe it because it fits your agenda
