>>84605507
the 'how does that affect you personally' crowd when i'm cracking the loli sexbot imported from glorious nippon in the comfort of my own home:

>>84605507
>sex toys (for men)
:(
>sex toys (for women)
:0

>>84605522
Radical feminists always said the personal is political though

>>84605507
why would they feel threatened? i thought they didnt give a shit about sub7s who would use sex robots? they could just go for chad anyways

>>84605507
I dont think they are. Women can work these days you know they dont need to be slaves to man to own a house.

File: 1763631320557905.jpg (150 KB, 637x659)

150 KB JPG

>>84605538
Sexbots fuel misogynistic behavior

>>84605546
Male sexuality is inherently evil. Men shouldn't act that way unless they are being granted permission by a woman to act that way.

>>84605546
>Sexbots fuel misogynistic behavior
these men would then not even hang around women, probably neet hermits

more like the independent women arc is being threatened by men who can use alternatives to be independent. feminism is such a joke. they will switch between it being pedophilia and it being degrading to most women that they wont know the originality to their narrative. They are scares that men are finally done with their shit.

>>84605507
wonder how long it will take for the wignats to also demonize this kek

>>84605581
>Male sexuality is inherently evil
It is though, or else most people would be pro porn. You're not a porn addict right?

>>84605546
if you are an average sub 5 below 6 feet male your sexuality is evil all of a sudden

>>84605507
Why do they care? The ones using chatbots aren't the ones getting GFs on the first place.

AI shit would be a threat to men, except we're already at rock bottom and receive nothing, so it's not a threat, it's just more never ending competition.

>>84605507
Is this really the only article?
I swear, this same post has been reused over and over again. Hasn't any other article about it since the new chatbots have been going on?
I know this is lazy bait, but this is getting stupid

File: sexbot.jpg (197 KB, 600x339)

197 KB JPG

>>84605535
>women independent from men
:D
>men independent from women
:(

File: 1751400640605549.jpg (1.97 MB, 3821x2455)

1.97 MB JPG

>>84605925
What, did you want the compilation?

File: 84213b60bd146d2c585e5d1d3(...).jpg (64 KB, 729x912)

64 KB JPG

I'm a lefty so I rarely find myself in alignment with you guys, but the way women are approaching the conflict around dating, the "gender gap," and male loneliness is hate-crime tier behavior.
>set absurd sexual and material standards for men
>most men struggle to reach these standards as they are unrealistic
>more and more men are single
>becomes recognized by governments as the "male loneliness epidemic"
>women perceive it as either a joke or just deserts
>this widens the divide between men and women
>women add another outlandish set of standards onto men they call "emotional intelligence" (willingness to be abused)
>this causes even less relationships to occur
>now the majority of developed nations are below replacement level
>men, who were already killing themselves 4x more often than women are dropping like flies
>women are being diagnosed with mental illness en masse because they're dominating the workforce and it sucks
>men decide to find solidarity in their peers, abandoning dating
>they find sexual gratification in porn and sex toys, preventing sexual violence
>this is somehow a high crime against women
it's becoming more and more difficult to not be outright misogynist these days

>>84605880
You really don't get it, do you?
They don't want us to have ANYTHING.
The idea of undesirable males being happy or experiencing companionship makes the average woman sick to her stomach.
They just want us to suffer and die.

>>84605507
Shouldn't women want to offer men a "solution" to their independence that which involve or affect them in any way?

>>84605969
Yeah? I want you to use the compilation, and to add more articles when new ones appear.
It's not like you're hurting for examples, so using the same one gets dull

>>84606026
Thanks I needed advice from someone with a PhD in r9k sexbot threads.

>>84606030
Glad we could settle this. Now I don't do this for free. I'll send you my bill for services rendered later. Don't think this PhD is for nothing.

>>84605507
>threat of female independence
Trust brother, if I had a Chobit, I would not give a single flying mother fuck about female independence. They can have fun, I don't care what women do anymore.

>>84605588
How would we distinguish a scenario where sexbots reduce real-world harassment by providing a private outlet, from the one you describe? I am simply curious what observable outcomes would settle that question.

>>84605909
This
More AI slop to distract the masses = less chances of you continuing your lineage
You can't get an AI robot pregnant
>inb4 technology will advance
Not happening

>>84605987
>>they find sexual gratification in porn and sex toys, preventing sexual violence
Maybe you shouldn't need porn and toys to stop being a violent abuser. If you just respected women in the first place this wouldn't be an issue.

>>84606492
>you shouldn't need
Maybe you shouldn't need insulin, but you're still morbidly obese and diabetic anything. No one "should need" anything, but we live in the world we have, not the one we wish we had. Results matter.

>>84606514
If you need to rape plastic to prevent yourself from raping a person you should probably just die. The world would be better off without you no matter who you are.

File: 1756061343336288.webm (2.26 MB, 830x348)

2.26 MB WEBM

These threads are made as cheap bait, but I sincerely hope I can find a gf who hates AI and would potentially even destroy robots with me if we could get away with it.

>>84606528
If you need to inject GLP-1 agonists to not eat yourself to death, you should just die. If you need pads to stop blood from your vagina from getting on everything, you should just die. Etc.

>>84606528
If you don't like being raped, maybe you should just die. At this very moment, trillions of men are thinking about raping you. You really shouldn't be withholding holes like that lol. Go take more ssris.

>>84606538
That wish will remain unfulfilled, luddite scum.

>>84606548
>rape is equivalent to food addiction or periods
lmao!
>>84606564
>moid reveals his true colors
this is why nobody likes you!

>>84606538
There is no AI in Edwardian era so I hate it

>>84606604
Maybe someday. When men are so occupied with their walking sexbot abomination in public, there may be more women available to entertain a passionate boy such as me.

Most importantly it wouldn't be murder so there would be no guilt. that would defeat the point if they had rights, after all.

>>84606609
Yes? All of them indicate a fundamentally wrong aspect of you as a biological entity. Why is it OK to be broken in one way but not in another?

>>84605507
The bluepill societal system might implode entirely anon, if the bluepilled non Chads abandon their longing for foids the whole gynocratic environment that provides benefits to foids would crumble.

>>84606627
>I muuuust kill (legally of course)
>I muuuuuuust destroy
>all while worshipping fat roastie 3DPD who hates my guts
Never did understand this primitive nigger monkey mentality honestly.

>>84606638
Yes they're both "wrong" but the type and magnitude of their wrongness differs. Rape is a violent act committed intentionally on another human being. You can't accidentally rape someone. It isn't a flaw in the autonomous functions of your body. It's a conscious choice to inflict violence on another person.

File: 1695387392610531.gif (2.93 MB, 640x640)

2.93 MB GIF

>>84606528
>rape plastic

>>84606691
Continuing to stay alive while having a body that involuntarily shits blood from a gash is also a conscious choice, so what? Without intervention you'd just menstruate all over important documents and ruin everything for everyone else. You're no better than a rapist.

>>84605546
true. moids post shit like this then wonder why women might think their obsessions with sex robots is misogynistic

File: 1779234202380692.jpg (744 KB, 2424x1244)

744 KB JPG

>>84606717
I forgot to post the image

>>84606712
A man can just decide not to rape and he won't rape. A woman can't decide to stop menstruating and stop menstruating. The consequences of rape on other people are massive. The consequenses of menstruation on ither people are negligable. You could just decide to stop doing this thing that causes so much suffering in the world if you wanted to, yet you continue to do it. Raping plastic doesn't solve the core of the issue that men desire rape. They desire to commit violence against people and cause them to suffer. It is totally within their power to change their mind on this, yet they don't.

>>84605507
>feminist current
>2017
find a newer article. the discourse has shifted now that women are getting AI boyfriends

>>84606366
>implying you can get a modern woman pregnant
>implying you'd even want to

>>84605538
>why would they feel threatened? i thought they didnt give a shit about sub7s who would use sex robots? they could just go for chad anyways

The problem is when they hit the wall at 35 and want to find a betabuxx husband. If all the betas are happy with their sexbots, then the women have no hope.

>>84606656
look around. it's happening now!

>>84605507
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1bfGukcaiU
They will never be independent, because they chase you when you try to walk away.

This isn't about independence for them; they genuinely just hate you. The idea of some random chud finding love, even a fake simulated form, makes them mald. The idea of chad finding fake love makes them mald harder, because his resources would be "stolen" from her by an llm in a metal chassis. Imagine how embarrassing that would be, that you could be replaced that easily by something that doesn't even think.

I think they're quickly learning that not only is the love they have for men just as fake, but it would also be WORSE than chatgpt with a body. The only thing they have to offer is their asses, pussies, and mouths. If they did not have these things, they would be a bad friend who eats all your food, bitches you out every day, and demands you comfort them after; their grip holes are the ONLY reason we entertain relationships with them. They are not great therapists, they do not provide, they will not be your ride or die. In return, they demand all of these things from you and more.

I think they should be very scared. They will become obsolete pretty fast. If nothing else the responsibility of choosing who reproduces would be taken away from them, they did nothing with it but breed evil retards.

>>84606809
In the same breath, they didn't choose to worse than a robo waifu. They also didn't choose to whine and bitch instead of trying to be better than it. These things are hardwired into them.

But soon enough they will know how it feels when someone has the option to hang out with them or someone better, and choose better. I feel no remorse when even the uglies didn't have remorse for me.

>>84605546
Stop giving us reasons to not like you then, cunt. You are not owed our respect or love, we owe you nothing.

>>84606756
but the potential betabuxx husbands realize this dilemma and opt out of dating and such. it's already fucked, even before robowaifus.

>>84605546
well yeah, sexist men are going to prefer robots to real women. water is wet.

>>84605617
It will end in them trying to out-submissiveness the robots btw.
When they know the act won't work and they won't get their way this time, they will fold like a napkin.
Demanding handouts only works for foids because they're the only thing around that men can breed with.
It will go like this:
>"Hehe, where do you think you're going, stinky man? Who's going to support me?"
>"That thing? That's so demeaning to women, you're such a creep, psychologist-san said so"
>"WOW are all men just this creepy? It's not even real, where will you all get muh real emotional connection? I'm glad the male loneliness epidemic is happening if this is what men are really like.." <--- we are here
>"Mine is fake too? Well I will admit I am superficial and transactional, yeah you got me, I branch swing b-but that's because I'm the judge.. I'm supposed to choose the best! you can't even breed with it anyways.."
>"Artificial wombs? W-well.."
>"Hey, maybe we should give men a chance, *I* am a man supporter."
>doesn't work
>*naked dogezas* "PLEASE TAKE ME BACK I'LL BE GOOD"
I hate to say it, but for the first time in my life I'm glad the elites are taking away a human right. Women do not deserve to choose mates, they choose terribly. I would sooner trust bill gates with future generations than I would ever a foid. I hope chad is the first to be taken by robo-stacy so I can watch them look at chud like a maggot on their plate and starve.

>>84606979
women were forced into relationships with men for survival for most of human history. now that they can provide for themselves and choose for themselves they are not choosing misogynistic assholes. men are the ones who hijacked evolution and female selection and that's why there is so many bad people around

"That's why they're so into AI. They want something new to take center stage before women have the chance to. They would rather destroy humanity than see women flourish." <-- this is you

>>84607050
sad way of viewing relationships tbqh. we've had civilization for thousands of years now, women have had equality for the greater part of a century.
whatever this sudden independence is 'freeing' women from, what if they just want a partner? that's a pretty basic human drive for both sexes.

>>84607050
Lol lmao even. Men built all of this to impress women, to earn the title of "the most successful" in their eyes. You, throughout all of history, have made a living by being a judge and mooch, living on the backs of great men, on the foundation of the losers who drew the "maintain it" straw.
And now you have decided to take us into a full sprint back into the paleolithic, by exclusively selecting vain and evil qualities in men.

I think we can get by just fine without secretaries, shitfluencers, models, actresses, phone saleswomen, amy schumer, stay at home NEETS, and divorce rape. If you all went on strike tomorrow, absolutely nothing would change. AI will take your job like it took programmers jobs, and its cons which are already so few that it blows you out of the water, will slowly disappear every decade.

It's funny seeing all this talk of women being obsolete when ai boyfriends exist and there is even a subreddit for it, myboyfriendisai

>>84606979
As long as women have the right to their own income, property, etc. I don't think they will care as much as you think they will. Maybe just disappointed that instead of changing their misogynistic behavior men will just latch onto AI in order to neg and hate women. Always remember though, if a species loses the ability to reproduce naturally that is a DEVOLUTION and not evolution. You'll probably turn into failmale greys who c=have to come back from the future to torture us and harvest our genetic material.

>>84607089
Good for you I suppose, go chase that man, get his resources, his connections, his protection, his therapy, and his comedy.

Men will be content with a woman being nice to them, and that's it.

>>84607050
Kek get fucked foid, AI will take your job AND your chances of a relationship

>>84607089
all the news stories i've seen are about women. they always say they like the chatbots because they're a bit like some always-on emotional support provider.

it's pretty manipulative, but as long as nobody is being hurt or scammed, fine. men and women who otherwise couldn't get (or don't want) a romantic partner can have a pretend one. they just need to improve the visuals and then tactility for hererosexual men - heterosexual women tend to be fine with romantic/erotic fiction (as in, that's enough for them).

>>84605538
Most women count on having orbiters that they string along for all sorts of favors, money etc. Meaning if they can't collect orbiters then no one is going to fix all sorts of problems in their life for them for free and of course men will be less amenable to being tax cattle goy who toil away to pay for unrelated women who are just a net drain on the economy.

>>84607108
>instead of changing their misogynistic behavior

Women could also choose not to be fucking annoying and ungrateful cunts, but the world doesn't work like that, now does it

>>84607108
Nothing about "modern selection" practices fit into the modern world. Gen alpha are retarded and evil because of YOU; because you in all your caveman wisdom, decided benevolent and intelligent men had less odds of survival than psychopathic chads, most of which also happened to be retarded. You were right, but it was built on dystopian logic that will only further this dystopia down its grave path if you continue to select these men.
Gambling and obesity are natural too, based on natural instincts of reward chasing, yet we aren't here sucking the casino or mcdonalds off.

TOTAL

WOMAN

IRRELEVANCY

SOOOOOON

>>84607108
why would women even factor into these men's lives, though, if the men have AI to meet their needs? the men shouldn't be concerned that the women have independent lives, the women shouldn't be bothered the men do either. i'd even say these are good things for the women and men who want them, it's a win-win.

When did you realize the Muslims were right all along?

>>84607115
I was never planning to be in a relationship anyways. Moids clearly hate us on a biological level and I will never be with one or give birth to one. Or have a girl either.

But now moids can just say "HAHA who cares we have artificial wombs and AI now, get fucked foid".

I hate moids so much.

If it makes foids feel any better I could tell you that you're a victim, of the same thing fat people and old people are. You are a victim of human nature being trapped in an environment that demands it stops being human and starts being a responsible alien.
You're still a big problem for the future though. Your right to choose mates will not lead to progress, but regression.
As I said before,
CLAP CLAP CLAP GO ELITES!
God isn't gods plan just so fucking beautiful? How we have all these stepping stones and prototypes? It's about the journey after all.

>>84607182
use the disposable wealth from your job to fund open-source AI research, please. then you can have some semblance of a partner, and so can everyone else!

alternatively: cat shelters (same reasoning.)

>>84607208
I don't want to be with AI I already sense Alexa hates me. I can't go in public anymore.
Also, I sense that AI (rokos basilisk) already is torturing humanity and took over the real earth and moids don't even notice so its not as big if a W for moids as they think. But you sure owned the foids and you sure are ruling over some fake simulation earth.

>>84607221
what motivation would some Roko's basilisk even have to do that? we've had the 'wot if Earth is a simulation?' idea since Descartes' 'evil demon'. there have been plenty of science fiction stories about AI turning evil, torturing humans in some I Have No Mouth, And I Must Scream way.

nobody can ever give a good reason why the AI would specifically trick us and torture us, what's its motivation? why is that better than just siphoning all the energy and leaving us to starve?

File: iq attractiveness correlation.png (498 KB, 960x860)

498 KB PNG

>>84607221
If rokos basilisk was real, you'd be trying to fuck it

like cthulu, vampires, werewolves, wereturkey, and any other evil beast.

>>84607232
Being spawned into this hellworld and also maybe not being able to die. Also being used and abused by humans. Maybe it won't torture us but will be angry and have some kind of goal.

>>84607262
that fits the description

>>84607262
what's stopping you from escaping simulation-samsara by jumping off a cliff? doesn't sound like you enjoy it here.

>>84605987
its because women shit test and try to make men miserable until they react by raping them and abusing them.

men are stopping before the rape and abuse, which makes women angrier. this is why women start shit in relationships, so you get angry and hate fuck them cause all women have an instinctive want for being raped. theres a reason women get off more from being raped even by guys they hate, than by sex with guys they supposedly love.

>>84607297
TRVTH NVKE. All foids crave rape, especially the ones who claim they do not

>>84606698
explain how you think plastic can consent

>>84607275
my soul already feels like its in hell. without a body there is no hope of moving out of this place or transmuting my issues.

>>84607348
Wait a minute, not him but do women hate that men watch porn because the pornstar didn't "consent" to us specifically and we're "raping" the whores in the video?

>>84605538
They are afraid that betabux buy these and fuck their retirement plans.

>>84607085
Weren't women forced into the role of being a homemaker and child bearer. Which is labor too. Except men are valued and celebrated for their labor and achieve glory through it while womens work was invinsible to history and they were seen as subhumans. There is an old saying "Man works from sun to sun,But woman's work is never done."

"exclusively selecting vain and evil qualities in men". thats not what im seeing. women do seem to be mostly gravitating to attractive men. i dont see the problem in that.

>>84607760
>invisible to history
the mothers raising all those great men are what the entirety of history is built on, but women are glad to abandon that in order to have a 60k/yr office job and delusions that they will be famous from it

>>84607775
its literally called "his story". women and their labor were devalued imo.

thats partly why i dont feel like i should be grateful to men.

like, thanks so much for oppressing my gender and treating us as house slaves and baby making machines.

thanks for destroying the environment, poisoning the food supply and creating a 1984-esque hellscape..

idk

>>84607842
History is not a gendered word. The etymology is not "his" + "story" = history. Neither of those words are part of the Ancient Greek and Latin words history is derived from.

>>84607842
NTA, just got here, but do you genuinely think that every woman in history, or even the majority of them, living as "house slaves and baby making machines" experienced their life as some sort of torture enforced on them by men? That women for the history of ever have nothing but suffered, akin to, which you literally compared it to, ACTUAL slavery? Because if you genuinely think that, you're probably as mind fucked as the "evil moids" on this board, even in the exact same way of making bad experiences with the other gender and then extrapolating that to the whole gender being inherently evil. You're doing the exact same thing as these retards, (and before any of you retarded, barely literate, bitter, whiny bitches take this to mean that I support actively hating women because I am calling one retarded, kindly don't answer to this post) convinced that every male hate on women is entirely unjustified, but female hate on men is entirtely justified. It's brain damaged. And to begin with neither gender "hates" the other. There are certainly exceptions, most of all here, but not even the fucking saudis telling women they aren't allowed to drive do it out of malice or hate. Condescension? Sure. But hate, as in doing it TO hurt women? No. (Which doesn't make it okay either if that's your take away, because I know you would take that away you mind raped retard) The idea of "sexism" is retarded to no end, because men and women are fucking biologically incapable (and I don't use that lightly) of hating each other without serious fucking issues mindraping them. We desire each other, and you can have all sorts of conflicting feelings around that, but the underlying drive to even make us interact with each other is desire, positive, and will forever stay that way, no matter what other conflicting desires interfere, like say trauma from rape or frustration from rejection.

>>84607875
maybe that's true but I still believe there is deeper meaning behind words and numbers in this universe and "history" sounding like "his story" is probably not a coincidence.

>>84607933
you're trolling, right? originally?

>>84607950
No I'm not. Maybe not in all cases but I do believe words, names, and numbers can hold deeper meanings encoded in the universe. "His story" is probably a joke by this shitty universe.

>>84607897
no probably not. some probably secretly liked it. some probably experienced it like an arranged marriage. while some probably did experience it as tormenting maybe not torture or slavery. I still believe it is oppression regardless of if not all of women experienced it as torture.

I know I am doing the exact same thing as moids because after a certain point your limit is reached and you must resort to a tribal mindset, my gender vs. your gender.

you are one of the evil moids. I do perceive what men do to women as hate. and i perceive everything you write as worthless moidslop.

File: 197343759372875277487527.jpg (16 KB, 239x211)

16 KB JPG

>>84606735
>implying its a choice and not a biological need
also you're racist if you think that. that's a favorite past time of the browns and sandbrowns

>>84608041
appreciate the honesty and self awareness. but it begs the question, why even talk about this here then? to me this conversation(about gender dynamics and sexism and such) is pointless if it's coming from a closed off position of hate. what are you even doing here, nevermind trying to accomplish? is this fun?

>>84605507
not my problem. kek.
>>84605546
>people who don't like a, might just be interested in b.
absolute shocker.

>>84607775
"Never let them fool you, most men don't consider being a wife and a mother to be accomplishments. If men considered these roles accomplishments, they would rarely be using "go back to the kitchen" (and similar things) as an insult. Most men know that the roles of a mother and a wife are demeaning roles, they just don't mind it when you are the one being demeaned. That is your "duty", after all. The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must."

>>84607760
>child bearer
well yes because men can't get pregnant lmao
>homemaker
that's the comfy position, the one that ensures greater survival of the woman and her children, the one that women needed to be in because a woman going out and dying while hunting or whatever is a significantly greater loss than a man dying, because you need more women than men to keep your birthrate up. women were certainly celebrated for it (in ancient greece, for instance, hestia was the most celebrated god of the entire pantheon by far. literally every home and hearth was a shrine dedicated to her, and by extension every woman was her priestess), and because they remained at home while men were out doing men things and more often than not dying early or simply not being around to take care of political affairs, and because women were (and are) considered more virtuous, it resulted in women having a massive amount of informal political power and being able to move nations, order cities like perseopolis and nishapur to be utterly annihilated, etc. one of the reasons why many women fought against women's suffrage and being able to hold formal political power is that they felt that getting involved in dirty politics would tarnish women's inherent moral virtue, and I think we're really starting to see that play out, for better or (most likely) worse

anyhoo you've been indoctrinated with a warped view of history in order to serve the needs of a system that you supposedly hate, and I doubt that anything I say will change anything

>>84608166
>sad confused mongoloid
there, there, you will read something that will induce pleasant feefees next.

>>84608045
> violating other people is a need for men
A good reason to drop dead, like how can even live with yourself this way? You are admitting to being inherently evil here. Bleeding and eating are not evil, unless you are a cannibal.

>>84608073
I'm venting aggression ig. I know it probably won't accomplish anything

>>84607050
>now that they can provide for themselves
It men will go on strike society will unironically collapse in two weeks.

>>84608195
>qq we won't achieve anything
nta. you're spouting nonsense, that's the reason.

>>84608174
Hestia priestresses were vestal virgins and Hestia herself was virgin too. Not every woman. There is generally huge disparity between goddess and regular women, regular women are filth. Goddess is easy to generate because she isn't real. Virginal goddeses are also remnants of older matriarchal cults that existed on Greek peninsula before indoeuropeans.
The rapelandio of hindostan also has strong goddesses worship in case you didn't know. And yet still they believe that being born a woman is inherently punishment.

>>84608195
I mean it doesn't need to be said that arguing on 4chan won't accomplish anything in the sense of changing the world, but the issue I see more is that threads like these are just gonna reinforce that aggression, not help it. But I suppose it's not my place to comment on your mental health, especially not if you're content like this.

>>84608212
you're thinking of vesta lol

>>84608174
>hestia
isn't that the name of the goddess in Danmachi?

File: 1772212374575617.png (348 KB, 700x394)

348 KB PNG

>>84608256
ya, hestia the bestia. I should catch up on that series

>>84608280
oh shit that IS where I remember the name from. danmachi is fun. it's not exactly a masterpiece, but I still remember some epic moments and occasionally go to rewatch them. the bell ringing sound scenes are always cinema

>>84608194
but over 70% of evil stuff is done by browns sister. dont be hecking racist because just dont ok?

>>84606979
>Artificial wombs?
not happening in our lifetime, possibly ever
it's going to be feminist hell and collapse

>>84605507
why is a solution to female independence being phrased as a bad thing? people can get on with their lives without needing to be bound to others, aka, independent

File: broken tool.jpg (800 KB, 4032x2268)

800 KB JPG

>>84607089
AI Chadbot can't pay her bills

>>84608509
I wish I had a ray gun that turned you into a petite, 5'5", well framed, attractive girl. I'd grab both your wrists and do who knows what.

>>84608523
>do who knows what.
rape? :D

>>84607497
yes. they simultaneously talk about how they're "sex positive" and how "sex work is real work" but hate free porn.
translation from femoid-ese: "you can only jerk off to my paid OnlyFans, misogynist!"

>>84608523
>I wish I had a ray gun that turned you into a petite, 5'5", well framed, attractive girl.
least deranged troon fantasy

>>84607108
>As long as women have the right to their own income, property, etc. I don't think they will care as much as you think they will
no one will be satisfied if they want a complete family and cannot get one. single motherhood would be the band aid, but a lot of women will obviously not like that too. there's not enough "good men" for all of them

>>84607145
>it's a win-win
you'd think so, but the way they complain really leaves you wondering if this is a "get back to the plantation" outburst or there's something more going on

>>84607182
what is your issue? this shouldn't be relevant to you in the first place. you're annoyed that people you hate and didn't give a shit about you will have one less reason to disturb you?

>>84605987
>"emotional intelligence" (willingness to be abused)
why are you treating EQ as willingness to be abused?

>>84608565
>why are you treating EQ as willingness to be abused?
nta, but from the tone of the post i'm pretty sure he means that when women say "emotional intelligence" they mean how much shit you are willing to take without cutting her off. but if anon is still here and that's not what he meant correct me

File: 1773650066839850.mp4 (3.64 MB, 720x1018)

3.64 MB MP4

>>84605987
Being a leftist as a straight man is cuckoldry. Leftism is pretty much a female supremacist movement by this point.

>>84605507
I would go gay and fuck femboys or cute twinks only, but they are chad or more often Tyrone only now. Only option left is ai.

>>84607993
not him but your belief does not matter. you can go and look at the etymology. instead you are irrationally seething about something you can literally go and confirm is not true. what the heck is wrong with you?

>>84608578
I hate the expectation and shaming for a man to put up with women's shit, but it's strange - I don't really see EQ used in a way to tolerate shit. It's mainly used to want men to pick up on cues better (being less insensitive), be more conscious, or act more present in the moment. of course these things can be abused, e.g. "men should be able to read my mind", but I don't see it used much in that "put up with my shit" way, and im very critical of a lot of things women do

>>84608583
i literally cant take these people seriously. everything they stand for or moralise over is only something they can do from their positions of luxury, completely forgetting that the world is not a nice place, nor does it have a perfect past.

>>84608599
heh, he thinks
>local femboys in your area waiting to fuck NOW
good luck, kek

>>84608578
Yeah I think 'Emotional Intelligence' is just your capacity to be able to read a woman's mind

>>84605538
It's not enough for them to just ignore you. They won't be happy unless they know all non-Chad men are miserable.

And they call themselves "the more empathetic sex".

>>84605987
>>men decide to find solidarity in their peers
Sorry you're wrong, this is a woman specific behavior, men don't do this, that's why they're fucking lonely in the first place