[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1779047214753500.webm (1.36 MB, 810x720)
1.36 MB
1.36 MB WEBM
It has attributes that can only be replicated in a high-energy lab and not at scale. How can it be a forgery if even today with modern tech it is impossible to replicate?

https://rentry.org/shroud-of-turin-27042026/
>>
I'm 100% sure that atheism is a position of deep ignorance
>>
>>84957837
>It has attributes that can only be replicated in a high-energy lab and not at scale.
Such as?
>How can it be a forgery if even today with modern tech it is impossible to replicate?
You just said it has attributes that can be replicated in a high-energy lab. So it's not impossible to replicate.
>>
>>84957916
Coming from the: "I don't know, therfore magic" camp thats pretty amusing
>>
File: skara 😒.jpg (29 KB, 476x476)
29 KB JPG
>rentry
Do I read this schizobabble or do I just play Deadlock? You decide for me OP.
>>
>>84958042
>So it's not impossible to replicate
Impossible to replicate with medieval tech and at scale with modern tech (only tiny samples)
>>
>>84958111
You still haven't answered the first question.
>>
Hey OP, who is Walter McCrone and why did he resign from STURP (the organization you constantly reference in your rentry) and criticize their findings? Why did he also accurately predict the radiocarbon dating of the Shroud?
>>
File: Vp8 image.jpg (635 KB, 1080x3667)
635 KB JPG
>>84958119
It does not fluoresce under UV light. It's discoloration is only 200-600nm deep and is not caused by pigmrnts but a chemical change that can only be induced with short UV-Laser impulses or corona discharges. Other methods are not known. It also contains 3d information. See rentry link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VP8_Image_Analyzer
>>
The shroud of Turin is real and basically a supernatural object that proves the resurrection.

But posting about it on r9k is a complete waste of time. Enjoy going in circles. Internet "discussion" is not a real thing. It's just retard babbling. The idea of talking about anything of value through social internet is... laughable. Thus I laugh, I chuckle indeed. Hope you all come to your senses some day and give up.
>>
>>84958310
This sounds like an admission of defeat for someone who really does not want to answer the hard questions about the Shroud of Turin.
>>
>>84957837
boring
it was made the 13th century in france
then retards started believing it's real
that's it
>>
>>84958367
If that were the case there would be replicas with all the correct chemical, physical and microscopic details. For a few years there was a prize of 1 million dollars offered for those who could replicate it with medieval tech. But it has never been replicated, neither with medieval nor modern tech. All attempts lack several key characteristics.
>>
>>84958414
Must have been aliens then
>>
>>84957837
That's fake.
The guy who faked it admitted he did so in the 1500s.
I believe in God as a voluntary choice.
Retards who use this bullshit to justify their belief are fucking delusional. They sadly turn insane once the same of being wrong makes them resentful.
>>
>>84959323
1500s huh? That's about when people were turning lead into gold. I wonder why we stopped doing that.
>>
>>84957837
Does this count as getting duckrolled?
>>
>>84959640
as if these oldHOMOS remember duckrolling.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.