Oldschool Abbywinters. Today, I'll show you Kerryn, a very unique girl, don't you think?
Armpits.
Who doesn't like pantyhoses?
She could sit on my face anytime.
Now to her main attractions.
I love when they're blushing. You almost only see that with AW girls.
Sadly, no pussy spreads or asshole shots.
It breaks my heart how hard AW and GOW went to hell after 2013
>>22288662This is a good thing, the women should at least be able to keep that much dignity.
>>22288645>>22288647love her saggy
>>22288740Not sure if this is about dignity. AW actually left the choice to models and paid them more if they showed more. I think they had categories like 1) Nude, 2) Legs Open and 3) Spreading pussy. Assholes were probably also 3).
>>22288744>>22288657Perfect boobs
>>22288738i thought i saw some trannies included in a group shot, absolute boner killernow it's like that bagel store that hired a tranny to work the register; are you fucking stupid, that's how you instantly kill repeat business
>>22289835I know pretty much all AW sets and I never "some trannies". However, it's true that the site went to shit because they had more and more "professional" and "indie" girls rather than normal innocent girls. The site owner actually explained that this was their only choice to keep the constant supply of models. In the old days, random cute backpackers had heard about the site and just showed up at their officies.
from 2019 loser, there was absolutely at least one trans in a group shot b/c i disavowed all AW content after that
>>22290965I knew about that model and never liked the move they made there. But it didn't change the site and by then, it was already not that good anymore. Plus, there's a difference between that and "some trannies".
>>22290623It's because they moved to the Netherlands which doesn't have as many sluts as Australia
>>22292029I would argue that Netherlands has maybe more sluts. Plus, a lot of the time the AW girls were also backpackers instead of Australians. I think the main reason is that the Internet was not as "developed" back then and people didn't think of the news of them being nude on the net would spread so fast etc
>>22288631Lap lap lap
Thanks OP, I really appreciate you re-visiting these old AW sets. You are doing a great service. These vintage AW girls are unlike any girls you see these days.
>>22292140Haha I didn't know people were going to enjoy her armpits that much.>>22293036True, but I'm also a big fan myself. I'll be posting again and again as long as all those cuties are appreciated.
>>22288662Would not ever
>>22288662Good no one wants to see this old slag's bunghole
>>22293991>>22293992Gays
>>22288738AW went to hell when they stopped peeing
>>22296515You can't really say that they stopped. Even very new sets have peeing, but not all older sets.
>>22296518AW went to hell during that intermediary period I lost interest in them when they weren't putting out sets with women peeing
Anxiously awaiting some new AW posts OP
Kerryn was once an infant, once a child with dreams, and you are desecrating her on the internet? Kerryn should be tending a garden and making school lunches, if she isn't, god help her.
>>22298500I'll be back in about two weeks with more girls. I have an almost endless stream of natural cuties waiting for you.
my favorite part of old aw was how so many of them had just slightly dirty buttholesi legitimately enjoyed that
>>22299240I'd say only a few girls had dirty assholes. Most of them had normal everyday assholes, they just looked different to all the bleached mainstream pornstar ones.
>>22299335nah this is incorrect. I'm talking like just very slightly dirty not pigs with huge smears of shit on their assholes. but if you really zoomed in looking for it (which i did because I'm a degenerate and for some reason cute girls with slightly dirty butts makes my dick twitch) there were quite a lot. i know because i collected them and it was big. in a fit of pique i deleted them all and have regretted it ever since
>>22299526Do you have any examples where you can still remember the names of the girls and maybe can find pics?
>>22299851About this level of asshole? :)
>>22299851How about this one?
>>22301341Also looks pretty clean to me.
>>22296515GoW is just as kinky if not more but the women look a bit worse because it's hard to find a natural woman that has a next-door look but is not covered in graffiti like an abandoned building in Detroit, let alone having normal hair instead of short and stupid painted like a cartoon to support trannies. It's a sign of the world we live in and how everything went south with wokeism.
>>22300864Carmen December. Top tier tomboyish cutie; I have filled a bucket for her over the years. I hope she's doing great, wish her all the best.
>>22303333I think it's rather the development of the Internet and the porn business. But you're right with what you about GoW girls. Plus I think they often have weird angles with their shots, while AW always covers the basic angles and perspectives (if the girls agreed).>>22303334Does she have anything to do with AW?
>>22303400I like the weird angles when they allow me to see how a woman is slurping another woman's hairy bum; I don't mind some close ups some of the time but what made me spend more money on GoW rather than AW was the hairiness and kinkiness of these next-doors in doing things to each other, and the finest selection of chubs like Christina, Hannah Tee, Violette, Valentine, Katie Gee, etc.Carmen December never worked for GoW or AW I think, and never did anything other than solos sadly. She worked for ATK Hairy, Yanks and WeAreHairy. What I'd give to sniff her pits and lick her nerdy arse while she gives me that lovely smile of hers. Now she's even classy and never went woke like a drug addict. 10/10 woman.
The things I would have done to Elizabeth. No force on earth could have pulled me out of her.
>>22303977Yeah I know Carmen from ATK Hairy, she's great.What I meant with weird angles at GoW is that sometimes they didn't even include basic stuff like standing nudes, spread legs, asshole shots from behind etc. Instead it was more like you'd get a wonky shot of just one boob or a random thigh.However, I was never a member. Would say GoW is still worth joing today and do they have big archives?
>>22288647Nice wish I had a wife like her
>>22303982Just wanted to tell you guys that I'll be back with more classic AW cuties in 10 days or so. I'll post more pussies and assholes than your cocks can handle and I'll try to find some "hidden gems" among the many natural cuties such as Rosalind here, who I posted previously. Stay tuned.Meanwhile, feel free to comment. Are there any other sites you can recommend becoming a member of. For me, nothing matches AW, but I considered joining We Are Hairy, ATK Hairy and occasionally have a Zishy subscription. However, all those sites have become worse over the years. As I said above, I'm not sure about Girls Out West...
I love these sets. Zishy seems to have some sets and girls that are alike in style.
>>22304044 full house>>22304687GoW is worth a month to me. Even if 90% of the stuff you want was shot years ago before everyone below 100 IQ started getting tattoos to advertise their low IQ, you're in for tons of the best stuff. Lovely next-door, realistic women (not plastic American skanks) from Laney to Blake Wilde, from Marina to Zelder, from Allegra to Violet Russo, strangely attractive nerds like Cali or Avalon, and I would give anything to meet 10/10 face porn like Christina or Hannah Tee.
>>22305020Sounds good, but to get back to the shot perspectives? Do their offer good views of the girls or just weird artsy shots with random body parts. I somehow have that impression when I think of GoW...
>>22305476You can see a few videos for free in SpankBang, I think they're good and normal.
