Two or more women showing off their feet.
>>22304049
>>22304090
Pics like these make more sense once you realize that women don't consider this sexual in any way whatsoever.
love nylon feet
Mother daughter
>>22304771
>>22304769Love big feet
>>22304774mother daughter photos are great
>>22305347Agreed, and wow mom's soles are so sexy
>>22305893Aren't they sisters? I believe their mom has big feet too
>>22304095Sexiest image of all time
>>22306189hot feet
Had a one night stand in college with a chick that looks like right.
>>22307258Middle has the worst face but the best feet. Many such cases.
>>22303564is left KJaneCaron?
>>22307576Agreed. It sometimes sucks having a true foot fetish, I've seen some ugly ass grannies (no, not hot grannies, I do enjoy mature women) but they had gorgeous feet, so here I am with a confused boner looking at her feet wishing I could bust ropes all over them.
>>22303631Are you aware of what you are doing wrong in this thread? Here, let me help you. Look at every other image in this thread. Pay attention to what these women have on their feet. Try and recognize a pattern. Once you’ve finally seen the pattern, realize your retarded mistake. Still going to fap to this anyway
>>22308953Left definitely gets my load.
Fuc this thread is gonna drain me
>>22309214>>22310996this is what they'll play in loops on the VR headsets at the white man re-education camps after reconquista
>>22310997More of right? Love nerdy girls that slut it up, amazing arches and toes
>>22311130
>>22311130>>22311132Wow! Their big feet and deep arches are insane
>>22311132Questionably feeted individuals on /s/
>>22309214>>22311214Where can I find more of their pics?
>>22311291Her name was something like Mars soles on Twitter (wish I could remember) but the account disappeared recently
>>22312672A quick search resulted to "Mars Feet - @Marsolesantoes". As you said, the account does not exist anymore.Now the question is who is the brunette one
>>22312793found a few more, not only her x account is gone but so is her instagram and her telegram channel is nowhere to be found
Shit on me for self promotion but I promise this shit is fire, put tons of work into it and want to share https://t.me/NaiveGirlsFeetDailyhttps://t.me/NaiveGirlsFeetDaily
>>22304115Incorrect. Almost all women in the Millennial and Zoomer generations are fully aware that the feet are seen as being at least moderately sexually attractive to a large percentage of men in most cultures.
>>22311130>>22311132Moar
>>22315417Lol, I love how you respond to the contrary as though you are some authority and affirmatively state that all that you say is 100% correct.Here's a clue: You are dead wrong. I am also not the anon you responded to, but it's obvious to all of us that you are dumb. Statistically, while non-scientific "surveys" claim all sorts of numbers (mostly due to self-serving interests), the fact is that only 1-2% of the population has a foot fetish. This has been measured scientifically by measuring genital and sexual arousal level when literally thousands of images are placed in front of the subjects, from a pool of 3,248 participants, randomly chosen when told they were going for a test on a completely different and unrelated medical screening with a small participation fee.Interestingly, it was 1-2% of all MEN who were shown to be sexually aroused by feet (and therefore have a foot fetish) whereas only 0.2% of females showed any form of arousal from feet, and also interestingly 96% of all females were actually sexually turned off once aroused by non-feet images when feet images were shown while it was only mirrored in 38% of male subjects actually being turned off by feet.Last, the incidence of homosexuality amongst male foot fetishists is over 20x that of heterosexual males. However, that number may be skewed as other studies have shown that closet homosexuals use a claimed "foot fetish" excuse by strict expression of partialism (needing to look at feet-only) for the denial.So your "almost all women in the Millenial and Zoomer generations" nonsensical statement is simply an outright lie. You not only have no basis to know that, but in fact that generation has not been tested (nor any generation), nor are fetishes ever generation-linked so your statement is doubly nonsensical as fetishes are hard-wired in the brain (or as most scientists believe MIS-wired, as it does not serve evolutionary ends to have a foot fetish at all).tl;dr you are a dumbass
>>22316292agreedpretty much everything you posted there is well known to anons with an actual foot fetish
>>22316441Fuck, left has the best, meaty, thick and wide soles with deep arches. More?
>>22316804her name is @sarahhfeetsgo nuts
>>22316292Can you link the study? I'm curious to see a study that finally used a method other than asking people if they find feet "attractive" in a vague manner. 1-3% seems believable.>(shit like necro/guro has millions more views online more than feet, yet studies say that its 1%> IRL, as an example of why online stuff is unreliable)
>>22317242whats the name of the girl on the right? i really like her morethx
>>22318127
>>22318633thx man
anybody has any mega or torrent? in a moment of fear I deleted my folder
>>22315417There's a distinction that you're not making. They may be aware that some men find feet sexually appealing, but they do not view feet sexually themselves. Let's transpose this to a different part of the body and it will make sense. Let's suppose that instead of feet there were a substantial number of men who are turned on my women's hands. Women are attention whores, and in this hypothetical scenario they can get attention and/or money from posting pictures of their hands on the internet. Would they start viewing their hands sexually? No, it would mean literally nothing to them. That a percentage of men get off to it wouldn't change their perspective on it, and why would it? A few of them take a picture holding their hands up for the camera, so what? Why would they even be embarrassed or anything about it? Women are socially conditioned their entire lives to not view their feet in this way. It's normal for women to be barefoot, to wear shoes that show off their feet, to paint their toenails, etc. That's just normal for them, it doesn't mean anything. As a man this isn't relatable really, since we aren't socially conditioned in that way, but that's the only way women's behavior even remotely makes sense.
>>22316292Cite your sources, faggot. I have access to a metric fuck ton of medical journals and studies as med student and I can't find a single study to support your claims or numbers. The only formal data post 1966 when a study was done to try to prove a link between paraphilias like podaphilia and genitals (the 'cross talk' theory that people are aroused by feet because the part of the brain processing that arousal is in close physical proximity to the part responsible for genital arousal so the theory is that people get turned on by feet because it connects with thoughts of genitals) by showing men sexually arousing photos and then interspersing a photo of a women's black knee length boot and they found they could condition men to be aroused by that image of a boot because of the expectation of more nude women. Dr. Lehmiller of the Kinsey Institute has surveyed people and found that foot fetishes are a multi-sensory experience and that it's rare that two people will have the exact same foot fetish, but according to Psychology Today - an actual publication and not some random faggot on a Mongolian underwater basket weaving forum - it's among the most common fetishes.
>>22319639>the 'cross talk' theoryThis has to be the dumbest thing I ever heard of. If that were the case we would get off most at having our own feet touched. Stupid as fuck "theory".
>>22319812What I want to know is how the theorists explain other fetishes, is the horny cortex the crossroads of the brain where armpits/TnA/bellies/anything under the sun meets? Where's the part of the brain responsible for clowns? Is it also next to the part of the brain responsible for arousal?
>>22319812Those are some meaty soles
>>22311132>>22311130
>>22320402
>>22320403
>>22320405
>>22320407
>>22320409
>>22303727Middle, small and perfect
>>22321074Patrician taste
>>22321431Left has the best ones
>>22319812>If that were the case we would get off most at having our own feet touched.i love ass and titties but i don't get off on having my ass or chest touched.
>>22318660Love women with big feet, got me stroking
>>22321884Yup that's exactly my point. The idea that liking women's feet is because your nerves for genitals are sharing your nerves for feet is completely retarded. I have no idea how this braindead theory caught any ground.
>>22322173I’m not sure either of you understand what the hell you’re even talking about.
>>22304115Most women are aware, some even censor their feet on social media and blurr them out, but that gives censor fetish people fuel.
>>22313385names?
psh
>>22316292When did you find out you have a foot fetish?
>>22313642put me in the middle :p
>>22324433Right is so hot
>>22305917What the fuck is with that censored bullshit?
>>22325173Adorable. I wish more women would show the peace sign instead of that disgusting gay cringe middle finger shit.
>>22325206You're looking for asians.
>>22326888Sexy, any more of them? Sauce would be appreciated
>>22326921file name on this pic
>>22327793Mature feet like this gets me throbbing
I find it harder to jerk it to multiple feet because it ruins the immersion, how would I ever be in a situation where 2 women offer their feet to me? And I'll always prefer one girl's feet over the rest so I'm just going to end up focusing on that one girl's feet.
>>22328368hired a couple of escorts myself.
>>22328368One girl's soles on your face and the other girl's toes stroking your dick. A third/fourth one's rubbing feet against your neck/chest/stomach to tease you further.>>22328362Damn. Literally perfect. They look insanely soft.
>>22328379Based, I never hired more than one at a time but I gotta try this one day.
>>22328634Need sauce on both. Fuck, left has amazing soles, right has amazing toes
>>22329762
>>22331438unironically equally hot
>>22316292>mistakes knowledge and intelligence>cites no source for outlandish claimsWhy are disingenuous faggots like this?
>>22331438Mother, daughter watches
