ITT we only post objectively BEAUTIFUL women. Too often here I see people post absolutely horrendously ugly and disgusting women. I find these actions to be evil and as such we will be countering this evil with good. Beauty is good and will triumph over ugly evil.
Sooo are you going to post 6 or what
I see you are summoning the wifepoters
>>22359340No, that is NOT going to happen. Wife posting is verboten.
>>22359345Relax, real life shit happens.
>>22359343Oh it will happen. This board has its dedicated wifeposters.
>>22359337
>>22359451Wifeposters disgust me.
The queen Ellana
Man the harpoons, the shitting of the thread has started.
very hot
>>22359337I certainly hope everyone's contributions are good enough for you.
>>22359725>>22359726A bit too fat for my tastes, but her face is pretty. This is borderline objectively ugly though. Any fatter and you WILL be banned.
>>22359834Naah, they'll just keep posting uglier until the thread has 130 images of 60 year old fat sacks."Wife! Who wants more?"
>>22359337So the first thing OP does is post a woman ugly as fuck! Even her titties are lumpy.....You need better taste OP, especially if you're going to advocate for beauty!
>>22359337Most these women are ugly as fuck, OP you need better standards as the mongoloid you posted is the worst offender. She looks like the inbreeding of a brother and sister
>>22360277stfu, face is fucked for sure, but them tits are top notch
And so the flamewar begins.Not the OP but seems I am almost the only one contributing.
>>22360276
>>22360300
more?
>>22359337OP, your post is of a sloth, she's gross, might want to get better standards before you preach Beautiful!
>>22361026/lgbt/ threads are that way --->
>>22361030AI slop
>>22361030fuck off ai fag
>>22360277>>22360278I swear the "beautiful" threads purposefully post objectively ugly women
>>22361070Good thing I'm not a fag like you, I've never been there like you...just because you like ugly women, doesn't mean real men do. So go ahead and hope back on over to your beloved /lgbt/ thread before you see a scary vagina.
>>22361474Indeed, as I said, beauty is subjective but purposely posting a woman that looks like a sloth is just stupid and shows very low standards.Prime example is this fag >>22361070
>>22360300>>22360303>>22360276who is she? amazing
>>22361517a girl I used to know
Actual high quality thread
>>22359725Since when was "queen" a euphemism for "Fat Kunt"
that’s a picture of reviewbrah with photoshopped tits, fag
>>22361505>>22361507You will never be real men.
My wife is objectively hotter than any of the slags posted so far, and none of you deserve to see her.
>>22365530Thread is getting better, but she wins it
I don't think you know what "objectively" means.
>>22359727Harpoons man'd sir but I think were too late, for there she blows and me harpoons dull!
>>22359728Most fat chicks are!
>>22365899You can't even define what a man is, much less judge others......MEN do not go after fat ugly females like you do simp, keep after the fat ugly ones kiddo!
>>22365901Some of us do anon, sadly the fat simping retards like>>22365899 ruin it for everyone else...*sighs*
>>22359344Good choice!
>>22361533A man needs a name.
>>22366279literally perfect
>>22360277>>22360278>>22361026>>22361474>>22361505>>22361507Nice try, trannies. Now go dilate before you hang yourself.
>>22368399>trannies out of nowhere >in a sexy beautiful women boardGr8 b8 8/8 and the rest don't skate.
>>22360277She's cute, that's just a bad angle
just sayin, "objective" beauty should mean it's enough to make an A-list celebrity cheat or at the very least be hotter than sydney sweeney. otherwise it's just your opinion bros
>>22369790Just saying, you don't know what "objectively" means.
>>22369847that's fair. i thought to use "mean" to make relevant a simple principle to discern high qualitative levels of beauty from the rest. you could shed more light or even propose a more objective measure to help us all.
My bitch
>>22359337This woman is a true goddess. I'd fuck her just to breed her
>>22359348I would not be able to keep myself from going behind and down for a sniff between her cheeks
>>22371071moar
>>22366158It apparently means “butterface” to 40% of anons posting ITT
>>22366758moar
>ITT we only post objectively BEAUTIFUL women.>posts a big breasted uggo lizardmmmmm
>>22382932why is the paper so high?
>>22380137As usual, the woman in these threads tend to not be any be any better than the run of the mill for this board ... except for this one picture. Oh my! Sexy body, perfect breasts (too big is as bad as too small), the planes of her face, her hair! Would!And she triggers my women in coveralls fetish. :)
>>22366758Def want more of her
>>22359337>only post objectively beautiful women>starts with Igor
>>22361026you must be a fag. this is a different picture of the whore you're calling an ugly sloth with lumpy tits. beauty is in the eye of the beholder, sure, but you must be fucking blind or gay as fuck if you think she's ugly.
>whines about pic quality being low in most threads>makes an average as fuck thread, same as all the othersa tale as old as time
>>22359337Shit taste.
>>22360222 Is the Apple talking to her?
>>22391859Why does AI like to put so many necklaces?>WYYYAAaaaaAHHH it's not AI!!!!Yeah, look at the bendy arm floating off the table.
>Recycled 2000's-2010's sloptent
