I need to know how to travel back in time or turn back time (preferably both). Please respond if you have any information on this matter. Thank you.
>>12584273please respond
ask yosho
>>12584716OK, Yosho, I need to know how to travel back in time or turn back time (preferably both). Please respond if you have any information on this matter. Thank you.
>>12584714There are only two practical forms of time travel, which are not actually time travel, but rather dislocations:You can go ``forward'' into the future by slowing down your own time, thereby existing in a state which is moving slower than the rest of the universe.You can go ``back'' into the past by speeding your own time, thereby existing in a state which is moving faster than the rest of the universe.Both are not actual instances of time travel, but rather alterations of perspective and state in relation to everything else around you.True time travel would be on a scale of being able to not merely slow or speed up the passage of time, but to actually reverse it, whereby the flow of perspective and state moves backwards.Even if you did this, you couldn't create a paradox, because you would be manipulating the current state of matter. Even this form of time travel, a reversal of the flow of events, is merely a deception of perspective: you are altering the present to recreate the past, not actually moving back into the past, but rather presently changing it. Anything that happens after the manipulation would be logically and temporaly tied to the moment where you made the modification, in so far as your own perspective is concerned.This proves that time is not a concrete existence, but rather a collective agreement regarding changing states. Therefore, there is no true past or future, but rather only an ever-changing present, with recorded ``past'' states and calculable ``future'' states.Your fortune: Good news will come to you by mail
>>12584724If you move near the speed of light, someone staying still will appear to slow down, but from that person's point of view the person moving near speed of light will also appear to slow down
>>12584724>>12584737none of this helps
>>12584766two same numbers!
>>12584766have you considered approaches other than time travel to whatever problem you're trying to solve?
>>12584774it's quite possible ...doc
>>12584737lightspeed travel doesnt allow you to go back in time, only go forward in time more slowly relative to anyone who is not traveling at lightspeed
>>12584777 (tribs)*takes a bite of the biggest carrot
>>12584774yes and time travel is the only solution
>>12584809solution to what
>>12584816the problem
>>12584828which is?
>>12584836if I was willing to tell you what it is I would have already
>>12584796you got that half right>lightspeed travel doesnt allow you to go back in timetrue>only go forward in time more slowly relative to anyone who is not traveling at lightspeedwell kinda true but you're missing some of the picture, the person traveling at near lightspeed has to eventually slow down in order for the person "not traveling at lightspeed" to have aged morei know its confusing XD
this is coz if one person is traveling near lightspeed and the other isnt, from both points of view the other will have slowed down
>>12584863Yeah you're right, I think I learned that when I was 12 so it's been a minute :P
>>12584866two same numbers!
>>12584867i learned the reciprocality of length contraction and time dilation only when i was like 20 somethingi think it's from something called The Eyewitness To Science, which also explains why light travels in a straight line in a mindblowing way
>>12584840nobody gives a shit what your problem is you stupid fucking kid you think youre so mysterious and important because you have some secret pain lmao let me guess you said something retarded to a girl 8 years ago and its been eating you alive ever since
>>12584881if you don't care then stop asking
>>12584888>888>tripsnice
>>12584863>>12584866>>12584871telling me all the ways going back in time doesn't work doesn't help
>>12584871Thanks for explaimnign it, Yuji :^)I think I learned about it on the programme NOVA we watched that a ton when I was a kidYour fortune: Excellent Luck
>>12584916You can go back in time using a wormhole, which is an extreme disfiguration of spacetime itself. However, a wormhole is a theoretical construct and has never been observed. It is also unlikely a human being could fit through one (that's why it's called a "wormhole" haha).
>>12584923I think the easiest way would be to either wait for the big crunch and re-expansion of the universe to try again, or (more likely at this point I think given the doppler observations regarding our increasing expansion rate) wait for the P-brane hosting our universe to collide with another resulting in another big bang, then try again :^)Your fortune: You will meet a dark handsome stranger
>>12584928
>>12584923is there a way to make a wormhole? Theoretically, of course.
>>12584964look it up on wikihow i guess
>>12584964make a rocket ship or other computer program to find one then make a rocket ship, or steal one then travel to the wormhole although you may just end up stranded on OGLE 2017, you could also explore physics round black holes and make a breakthrough of the singularity this would at the very least fix your problems by engulfing the earth
>>12585048*pat pat*