[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
[s4s] - Sh*t 4chan Says


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: GPAd99taMAETt1V.jpg (283 KB, 1154x2048)
283 KB
283 KB JPG
Could the English army from the Battle of Agincourt have defeated an equivalent number of experienced Roman legionaries from the Second Punic War? I lean towards no.
>>
>>12758658
I think the English would triuph resoundingly
>>
>>12758658
You just know that without makeup and filters, she's a 3/10 at best.
>>
more like th e battle of faggotwhore
>>
What if the English had a squadron of trained velociraptors and the Romans had a phalanx of giant bladed crabs



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.