Can the theory of solipsism be reconciled with the theory that reality is an ultra-simulation?I have always imagined that Real Reality (RR) is outside the simulation, something like in The Matrix when they are in those capsules, but on a local level. A technologically supra-advanced society that has these capsules in their homes, and when they get into the capsule, they enter the game (birth), something similar to GTA but taken to the extreme, where you think that is reality. Once you die, whether by accident or natural causes (of your avatar in the game), you wake up again in the capsule. For example, in RR hours have passed, but in the simulation you have experienced 80 years (or however long you last in it). Like virtual reality, but on such an immense scale that you enter the game itself (although it would only be your mind) and believe that the simulation is real, but in RR you are inside the capsule. And that is also why the deceased cannot return, because apart from being a simulation, upon re-entering the capsule, you would restart (be born again as a baby). After all, everything is code.What do you think of my theory?
tldr but oll korrekt
>>12892804I think her vajay is TINY dude, like sus tiny. like not fully developed dude. do you get me
sometimes I just imagine the universe just is, and there's no god, no meaning, no catalyst, we live and then we die forever, consciousness is the result of mechanical processes, and our ability to self-reflect is a byproduct. death is a permanent escape.I don't necessarily believe this but it scares me to think aboutYour fortune: （ ´_ゝ`）ﾌｰﾝ
>>12892804solipsism and simulation theory are the same midwit bullshit, they don't need to be reconciled bc they're badically the same moronic idea posed two different ways - "what if nothing actually exists ooooo"Your fortune: Better not tell you now
>>12892827how can you compare hypothesis when you don't know the answer for sure?
>>12892854the alleged "hypotheses" suggest something utterly untestable and unprovable and thus are not viable in the first place. you've simply postulated that reality is something other than what can be materially observed, whether by way of convoluted simulation or fleeting illusion of experience itself, something which which you cannot test and therefore cannot prove to anyone - including yourself - by any means. there is no proof because there is no theory. there's no reason, literally, absolutely, NO reason, to believe the material world is not exactly as real as it appears to be. solipsism and simulation theory are the same theory and they're both for idiots.Your fortune: （ ´_ゝ`）ﾌｰﾝ
>>12892876its always funny seeing aggressively reddit posts like this sperging at reddit shitYour fortune: Very Bad Luck
>>12892904whatever nerd im gonna cum up ur butthole. try and pretend that isnt real.Your fortune: Outlook good
>>12892876This.Suggesting an unfalsifiable hypothesis as to what is the nature of reality is logically equivalent to saying God is real and just as meaningless.
>>12892804Your problem is that you think too much in terms of what you already know from your life. Your scenario is like Russell's teapot.Also, you talk about "real reality". If you're conscious, that is what's real. Ultimately, it comes down to fallacious thinking. Humans always do this when thinking about deep questions. People become afraid of not existing and such. It's just because they don't understand and thoughts get jumbled up. In your case it's probably the feeling of distrust that's the root for your RR concept.
Don’t know, don’t give a fuckPussy and butt
>>12893121it's just banter which is meaningless and therefor meaningful
