Omg!
why do atoms make low frequency humming noises?
>>16760764maybe they're bored
>>16760764Some humming is typical and a part of normal operation. If the noise is loud and persists for more than a few minutes, it may be advised to unplug and wait approximately 30 minutes before plugging it back in. Proceed to the next section if this doesn't resolve the issue.
>>16760764The universe is make of music and the atoms themselves are music.
>>16760764sorry, it's high-pitched, like mosquitos
>>16760764they snore
>>16760764Thinking about layton puzzles.
Output of the code: D-R-I-N-K-O-V-A-L-T-I-N-E.
>>16760903Step three: listen to the music of the spheres
>>16760761what does that title even mean? for a while I was already slowly coming to the opinion that journalists need to be sent to brutal reeducation camps, mostly because I am implementing industrial applications on top of LLMs and have to deal with hype regurgitated by clients. this title is another nail in that particular coffin.
>>16761415>what does that title even mean? Oh my gosh!
>>16760764particles tend to move, unless you put them into extreme conditions like absolute zero. and if something moves, it creates friction. with other particles. this friction produces vibration, which we percieve as sound.>humming noisesum of all particle noise together. probably if you put the hum into fourier transform, it would pick up the periods of atoms, electrons and maybe even the smaller ones. maybe you could even detect the state of atoms or which orbit the electrons have just by the sound it produces. the technological challenge would be to make "microscopic" mic, which would be able to filter out all other noise except from the one particle you are interested in.
>>16760761not they fucking didn't you scum
>>16761650cute bird
can i cause a helvetica scenario with things i can find in my home?
>>16761415>what does that title even mean?This headline makes it sound like they decoded messages from some paranormal entity but in fact the scientists encoded some quantum computing stuff in a new way. It was a long-hypothesized way so it wouldn't be inaccurate to say they cracked that.Anyway, ScienceDaily isn't a real news source. It's an aggregator. All they do is take press releases from universities and repost them with their own wacked out headlines substituted for the original ones. The original one here is: "'Rosetta stone' of code allows scientists to run core quantum operation"
>>16760902I have an atom in the hallway. it chirps every once and while, but it's supposed to do that.
>>16764982here's the actual abstractthey did, in fact, achieve something pretty remarkable, but it's definitely not about "cracking hidden codes"
>>16769831pretty cool diagram too
How does one play quantumly with single atoms in ones own house?
>>16761415>what does that title even mean? "0mg!" is 0 milligrams factorial.(0 mg)! = 1 mg, by definition.So, it means "one milligram".You're welcome.
>>16769985>how to meet single atoms in my areaFirst, and this is VERY IMPORTANT, you MUST verify the age of the atom.
>>16769627but is it inteligent?
>>16770034Kids should learn an appreciation of Nature's beauty.
>>16770064amen
>>16770143Wtf is up with the blurred out fiddler crab in this video?
>>16760764Easy.
>>16769993first there was nothing 0big bang 0!Oneiverse 1
>>16760764Perhaps atoms are part of a microscopic choir
>>16761457>>16769993dear retards: 'Omg" was not the title, "scientists cracked ..." was. now go hang yourselves for your own good.
>>16770856Kek. This guy thinks the image caption is the post title.
