So how do we test all these hypotheses generated by incels from evolution theory? For example: the use of make-up by human females has been compared to animals signaling their fitness and reproductive readiness to attract a large pool of potential mates and select the cream of the crop.However, human females are not known to admit to having such motivations. How then, do we establish the truth value of the hypothesis? We can establish and compare results (for example: fitness of offspring) of human females with and without motivation to put on make-up but is that enough to prove that the results are the actual motivation of the behavior? Furthermore, if true, does that mean that human females are driven by forces unbeknownst to themselves and isn't that a kind of schizo worldview?
>>16771054>human females are not known to admit to having such motivations.Nigger have you ever talked to a woman?Yes, they will straight up tell you that they wear makeup to look more attractive. That's the whole point.
>>16771068The women I've talked to find it insulting to compare human behavior to animal behavior and they claim that their appearance is the result of what they themselves happen to like and not the result of what's popular or what they think men like.
>>16771054>So, /sci/, how do we test pattern recognition?Heh.
>>16771098The rooster crows and the sun comes up. Is the rooster crowing the cause or the effect of the sun coming up?Now a woman puts on make-up and she gets a lot of attention. Is the attention the consequence of her make-up or do women who get a lot of attention tend to put on make-up because the attention makes them more self-conscious? Do attractive women tend to put on more/less make-up more/less often than less attractive women? Do women who put on make-up attract higher quality mates and produce higher quality offspring? Is make-up still advantageous in environments where make-up is less normal and valued? There are even many more questions to be asked and the answers aren't self-evident.
>>16771054>human females are not known to admitniggah please, here's a free lesson when it comes to bitches, don't beilieve a word they say and look at what they do instead.Women dress like whores to attract men then they create chaos so the men fight to the death with the strongest survivng chad having earned the right to blast hot ropes up her wretched stinky holes.
>>16771068It is the opposite case. There are times that they are so ready to be fucked that they will do anybody. Wearing masks these signals by making them look always ready, so they have better odds of mate selection. Like every other pathetic thing they do, it is merely done to confuse the male and for no other reason either.
You haven't properly defined makeup.What you actually need to do is learn about makeup OP, then things make a lot more sense.>foundationThis just hides blemishes and acne, etc.It also causes those things, which creates an addiction because you need to wear makeup to conceal the damage makeup caused.It's also not sex-specific, men do wear foundation for TV and film.Some men do wear concealer for bad acne or ingrown facial hair.>lipstick/lip glossLipstick is fundamentally sexual, and gives off the fertility signals.It also gives women a way to "mark" their man with kisses.Also blowjobs. Hence it's fetishized.>eyeliner/mascaraThis is where the evolutionary hypothesis breaks down completely.Long, defined eyelashes are *masculine* not feminine.>inb4 you know too much about makeup faggot
