in a "hypothetical" lottery game "pick 6 balls out of 48 with 35 drawn", with expected return of between 2 and 3 times ticket price per winning ticket (or more) and a second "hypothetical" lottery where you "match 3 numbers against a draw of 6 from 40 numbers" with returns of 65x ticket price per winning ticketcan you please express this in odds of winning where 1 is 1 winning ticket 2 is 2, etc (in decimal) against numbers of tickets purchased and expected returns that i can make a table from, or as a vector equation i can make a graph from.the ai chat machine is wrong when it makes numbers from what it projects is potential winning combinations / total combinationsand i am wrong when i write into the calculator 6/(35/48) and 37(6/40) i am looking for an optimal number of tickets to "purchase" at value "1" to ensure most wins per bet on the 6/35/48 lottery and likely projected potential returns on the 3/6/40 lotteryif you're scared too many people are going to win at bingo please ask for my email and we can talk about hypothetical bingo in private
i want to compare against my current strategy trying to hit 3 times with 130 tickets on the pick 3 (i may have forgotten the payout on this game if you know it please correct me, it could be 35x not 65x)and playing 2 tickets per round on the 6/35
>>16771886What's your goal? Are you trying to play a Nash equilibrium or design a fictitious "fair" game? If the first, who cares. If the second, gamblers play even bad odds.Obviously it is the union of two X choose Y and you're solving for the probability of at least n wins.
>>16771886interesting
can someone help me fix this table 15 years ago i was be able to do maths alrgeba for teenegars
>>16776526what were you thinking when you made sum n / F ?i was thinking it would cover the inputwhat were you thinking when you added + (n-1)-(n-1 / F) i tried adding 1 instead and i tried adding ( (n-1) / F ) and i tried loads of ideas the total out was becoming negative
>>16776535its based on the principle that if you lose the coin bet you can increase your wager by over 100% and you will always profitbut with 3:1 payout you could afford to increase the wager by lessits not smart its clearly not working correctly
>>16776526well...where's the start point?
>>16778544by the arrow which says initial bet?heres another idea you can do the hamnintgon theorum ubt every 2nd bet you can bet under double and thats going to help you save total money
>>16771886Pretend like youre working on AI a whole lot because it sucksDon't let the economy burstIt's good for rounding up information or peopleShould be easy to be awareAlso people the jews pilot botnetsTo secure public opinionDo well to mind the bell curveMindlessnessHave responsibility
>>16778795ok pilot the lotterynow or im going to buy more ticts again tomorrow and lose all and lose all of them
