if the big bang made equal parts matter and anti-matter, where did all the anti-matter go?
>>16773316Into the pastThe universe is time-symmetrical. Before the big bang there was an anti-universe made out of antimatter when time and entropy flowed backward. Our universe is the mirror-copy of the anti-universe, and everything that is happening now has (un-)happened before
>>16773320sounds like bullpoop considering we can create and observe anti-matter without it teleporting backwards in time
>>16773316ackshually it didn't make equal parts matter & antimatter - this is well established and well understood via CP violations
>>16773340>well established and well understood It's hypothesized, far from as concretely decided as you make it sound
>>16773359It's hypothesized there are unequal matter and antimatter? Great, so OPs question is already answered.
>>16773316The universe rotates or something idk
>>16773340>CP violations
>>16773316i ate it up
>>16773333well, yeah, and in said antimatter universe the antimatter people can create antiantimatter(so regular mater) without it teleporting antibackwards(so our forwards) in time
>>16774049why did it go backwards during the big bang, but forwards after things calmed down?
>>16773677Lmao that’s how abstract reasoning works
>>16773316Same place the matter went.Any other response assumes shit we can't fucking know.Better question might be "what about the strange matter," but we're not allowed to talk about that or something.>not noticing that things that annihilate violently don't much like sitting next to each otherI'm thinkin' "hmmm."
>>16773340Then what happened to the extra stuff if it all doesn't have to be conserved?
>>16773340>CP violationsm-mods?
>>16773316it turned into dark matter
>>16774221What? It formed the universe dummy.
>>16774256No, matter is the universe, but if it isn't balanced out by an equal amount of counter spinning anti-matter, then where are the extra parts or where did they come from?
>>16774266Same place the matter came from.
>>16774269No, matter comes by splitting from anti-matter in the process of pair production, so what about the unpaired extra.
>>16774285>matter comes by splitting from anti-matter in the process of pair productionNo. We're talking about the big bang, not QFT.
>>16774287No, we are talking about matter and antimatter which need to paired to exist.
>>16774303Wrong.
>>16774307Incorrect. OP specifically said to just assume the conditions of the big bang (not to talk about it), but actually discuss and talk about the implications of matter and antimatter.
>>16773316I ate it
>>16774311>Assume falsehood>Babble
>>16774190>>not noticing that things that annihilate violently don't much like sitting next to each otherwhy do they seem to readily react with each other in the particle accelerators? i don't think the experiments apply additional energy onto the particle pairs to make them go back together
>>16774875Not him, but it is a severe category error to say particle accelerators and the origin of the universe work in the same ways. Theoreticians just make that assertion because they wouldn't have jobs otherwise.
>>16773316Backwards in time... though from our perspective it all came together in a big crunch to cause the big bang.
>>16774892anon said that dark matter is anti-matter which seems to be repelling matter. that is a current observation and i am just saying that it doesn't make sense when we put anti-matter together with matter inside a lab
>>16773333>weYou got a mouse in your pocket?
>>16774344>falsehoodlol retard
