https://www.quatism.com/lottery.htmSummary:Following the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, quantum measurements result in a sample of all possible measurements, so mapping these to bits will necessarily diverge worldlines. Typically, these worldlines would converge naturally because those quantum measurements get aggregated out (to outside observers they're effectively the same,) but if you do something like map the results to big things then the divergences can persist and split off new worldlines. This is described in depth in https://www.quatism.com/theory.htm - however this has some additional advantages in the context of the lottery. It won't cover all worldlines, but it will potentially provide the ability to travel to the worldlines wherein you won via morphic travel if you can figure out how to master it.This is /x/, so likely everyone knows "the lottery is rigged." But what if there's a way to un-rig it? That's what this is aimed at primarily. A rigged lottery relies upon having someone to rig it on behalf of, perhaps multiple someones, perhaps a great many someones in their own VIP lottery pool. What this does is provide a sort of multiversal DDoS attack against a rigged lottery: when the number of people playing quantum tickets exceeds the number of tickets available to parties rigging the lottery the absolute best-case scenario for a rigged jackpot would be a split pot, wherein everyone playing quantum tickets still has a worldline wherein they won.
>>16775414>I won the lottery but I don't get any money because the other mes get to spend itThis is your brain on capitalism.
>>1677541411, 14, 16, 31, 68 + 21what do I win? nothing? get outta here
>>16775418Don't share your numbers unless you want to split the jackpot with 50 people
>>16775421nah, the number only works for the person who generated it.
>>16775421The crypto-wisdom is strong with this one.1) Choose random digit based on the least-likelihood approach,2) Go to next least likely sequence,3) Repeat for as long as you can remain solvent.Literally the best (personal) expected return strategy there is.You're welcome. You owe me 10% of your post-tax winnings for that sage advice.
>>16775426>least-likelihood approachthey are randomly generated numbers. there is "likely" or "least likely" sequences. all are equally likely.
>>16775434*no likely or least likely sequence
Bump
>>16775482What do you want?
>turn on the tv>globetards at CERN divided the 'verse into eleventy billion timelines>ours is #69>worldwide happiness increase>international solidarity>no more wars, homicides, etcEthically speaking, should one lie to the public, if it's for their own good?
>>16775424Assuming that by chance another person uses the exact same number that the wooha-statistician generated as winning number for himself, keeping it secret and following all the orders - would the numbers still only work for the person who generated it?
>>16775564I think so, it would create an alternate timeline where the other guy lost.
>>16775567I will personally make sure that there will be a holocaust against all you new-age assholes.
>>16775434>>16775436Goddammit, least likelihood of being wagered upon by others. Like too many people pick 1-10-11-20-22-33-01 or 04-20-69-23-46-13.So you wager on the sequencws least-likely to be wagered upon by others.My bad. Reduce my cut to 8% for not being clear.And thanks for asking.
>>16775605You can't fade your own trades. That's not a thing.
>>16775609I know my bets. I'm beating against everyone else's.3-14-15-9-26-5, right out. Never bet on that shit.
>>16775636Assumes other bettors aren't using the same logic to avoid the same thing.
>>16775649Win-win-win, if everyone picks the least likely sequence it can not contain any of yours since for your bets the likelihood is 1.
>>16775788Zip it, tramp
>>16775791Projection
>>16775414it's easy, u just
