I wanted to publish philosophy text to some journals or magazines.I found some big journal and the conditions are retardedhttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/journals/et/instructThey say you can't for one year publish your stuff anywhere else, even on your own website or social media. You can't publish it on other journals too.Should I just fuck them and publish my stuff on my website and forums or somewhere?Give me good ideas how to post important philosophy/ethics text. Or some science text.How to publish and market your science and philosophy discoveries?
>>16776215The Outrage Generator seems to be awful weak with the bait today. Was Tel Aviv bombed? Did Musk shut down the Internet, again? Massive LLM model collapse and the bots can't CAPTCHA no more?Anyone else seeing the same? Any confirmation from Netcraft?
>>16776215>Give me good ideas how to post important philosophy/ethics text.Kirkland is always in the market for new toulet paper patterns.https://shitstains.kirkland.net/submit/index_ie.htm
>>16776221>>16776223Go away noobs, this is serious thread for experts.
>>16776215Reword 70% of it and publish where you like. Or do a summary or interview for the general public.
>>16776276>expertsLazy troll is lazy.Professional troll would have incorporated AI slop about more liberal publication policies for other, more prestigious journals, but you have no chill.Publish one of you papers here or post a link. I am a reviewer for multiple academic journals of higher thought.
>>16776215>idk howto turn one paper into six>halp me revenge >reeeeeeeClassic /sci/. Never change.
>>16776215You publish here, 4chan.org
>>16776215>Philosophy>DiscoveryJFC
>>16776280>Reword 70% of it and publish where you like. Or do a summary or interview for the general public.I do not want to reword it because it will be worse.>>16776282>Publish one of you papers here or post a link. I am a reviewer for multiple academic journals of higher thought.If I will post it right now on /sci/, you will steal it and publish under your name, you will also collect 100k prize and fame.I need a plan how to publish it everywhere and market it, but also keep my copyright.
>>16776359>If I will post it right now on /sci/, you will steal it and publish under your name, you will also collect 100k prize and fame.I promise you that my intent is only to mock you.Sign the document, post to your website, achive with Google and Internet Archive, make a Wikipedia page pointing to it all and just us that page. EZPZ.
>>16776407>Sign the document, post to your website, achive with Google and Internet ArchiveI could do this, seems good. But I also want people to read it, where to advertise it? 4chan, reddit, youtube? What about some philosophical magazines and journals?>make a Wikipedia page pointing to itI think they will remove it.
>>16776215Have you tried arxiv?
>>16776215Put it on archive.org and some schizo may read it.
>>16776429>I think they will remove it.Both you creating the wikipedia page and them removing it will be audited events which you can subpoena when you sue anon for stealing your idea.
>>16776215Academic publishing is just sending a letter to your colleagues or circle of friends. I know it's a bit more of an industry now but that's really all it's supposed to be. Who are you trying to communicate your philosophy to?
>>16776434What is arxiv? I will check.>>16776439Ok.>>16776447>Academic publishing is just sending a letter to your colleagues or circle of friendsI don't know any scientists or philosophers.>Who are you trying to communicate your philosophy to?Everybody. Philosophers but also normalfags. Everybody.
Do all journals require such rules, that you can't post anywhere else?What are good places to post philosophic theory/text?
>>16776759>Everybody.Then whatever you do, don't publish it in a journal. Do you know how few people read journals?
>>16776881>Then whatever you do, don't publish it in a journal. Do you know how few people read journals?No, I don't know.So I am better posting this on forums, imageboards, youtube and other places?But people who read journals might be more influential and write their ideas related to my theory.
>>16776894Twitter gets the most traffic, I think. Every influential person is also on it.
>>16776901Thanks, I will try. But twitter only allows short messages. Also, will anybody read my post when I have new account and no followers?
>>16776215my philosophy is based on astrology
>>16776905More people will read it than read any particular journal.
Do you know good places to post philosophic discovery, new theory?
>>16776434>can't publish to bioarxiv unless you are collabing with a published researcher at a recognized institution AHHHHHHH
>>16777098NTA but I still don't understand. Why do you want to send your letter to a small group of people who don't know you?
>>16777105I'm not op I was just venting
>>16777107Okay, so why do you want to send a bio letter to the people on bioarxiv if you don't know any of them?
>>16777111oh getting published can help get me a job
>>16777116It can't. Why would you get a job for spraying graffiti on a wall you don't own? If everyone can spray shit somewhere, you spraying yours there has no value.
>>16777111So they read the theory, spread it to other people, write their comments.
Where do you post your scientific discoveries?
>>16777625on /sci/
>>16776215>How to publish and market your science and philosophy discoveries?To what end do you want to publish it?You could write a blog and use a bunch of bots to shill it.
>>16777911>To what end do you want to publish it?Everybody, I want to target both scientists and normalfags. I need many places and techniques.>You could write a blog and use a bunch of bots to shill it.I do not have bots.
>>16777506Why do you want them to do that?
>>16778116Because this philosophic discovery can change a lot in the world.
>>16778696Why do you think your change would be good? And whether it is or it isn't, how does publishing it as a colleague letter to a vanishingly small circle of academia help to change the world?
>>16778696only if it benefits the few who have control over everything. current accepted views are not on accident, but by design
>>16779327Yes, if my theory was in journal, only small number of philosophers would read it, but maybe later some magazines and more popular websites would repost it.But I could also post theory in more popular places from start.>>16779332It is uncertain if it benefits the few, but possible.
Do you know places like WEF, Bill Gates and similar? Can you list them?
>>16776215>I wanted to publish philosophyLol
>>16777098try vixra
Where to publish BIG THEORY???
I think what OP is really asking is how can he protect his IP before just copy pasting it everywhere.Surely there must be some method to ensure his name is attached as the original author. Even if it just for the principle of claiming it as his work. In this day and age anything you post on line will be be stolen by some Jeet or Zipper and re-posted a million times.Case in point, I often pepper my 4chan comments with unique phrases. Sure enough I will find someone else ( or bot ) using those exact same phrases, including my deliberate misspellings and nonsense words, somewhere else a few days later. Fuck, there are even utubers who make a fucking career out of shoving themselves in front of someone else's video and "commenting on it". Lol, I came across one guy doing this on videos about squeezing blackheads. I mean, how fucking low can one go?
>>16781670I wish people reposted my theory everywhere, but I don't want some pajeet to steal the credits.
Recommend a good plan.
>>16781635>>16782310ASTOUNDING THINKS NEED HOME!Halp me for my lulz. Kthnxbye.
>>16782081Dude, asked and answered five fucking days ago. Publish already!
>>16782081Is there a way to send your work to some publisher and get some sort of copyright on it? Basically to say "This author submitted this work on this date"Essentially a rubber stamp of authorship. Not saying it actually has to be published or distributed in some form, but just to have an official third party acknowledging you as the source. So at the very least if you then start distributing it yourself and someone copies it and posts it as their own work you have some ability to claim ownership.
>>16782382>Is there a way to send your work to some publisher and get some sort of copyright on it?I don't know. What if this "publisher" will steal it and post as his?
>>16776215Just go on any site that requires a log in through an email. Then post it including your full name in the post.. Presto! You have now got your name attached to your work with a time stamp. You could post it on Khan academy, they have a philosophy section..Hell you could even do it on leddit. Probably get a million upvotes if its any good and tinged with left wing sympathies. Two million upvotes if you add something favorable about women. Wow! Three million upvotes if you also sneak in some jibe against Trump.Wow....Man I should get into this. Let's see..."I think, therefore I am....a feminist transgender Marxist who hates Trump."WHOAH!! 4 MILLION UPVOTES! I DIDN'T EXPECT THIS TO BLOW UP! THANK YOU KIND STRANGERS!
>>16782559>You could post it on Khan academy, they have a philosophy sectionI will check this site.>Hell you could even do it on leddit. Probably get a million upvotes if its any good and tinged with left wing sympathies. Two million upvotes if you add something favorable about women. Wow! Three million upvotes if you also sneak in some jibe against Trump.If I have a new account with 0 karma I will not post anywhere, they will block me on every sub. I do not have any reddit account with good karma.
>>16782559>>16782606I checked Khan Academy, it seems to be a place to learn existing knowledge, like in school, not a place to publish novel theories.
>>16782606>If I have a new account with 0 karma I will not post anywhere, they will block me on every sub. I do not have any reddit account with good karma.Also when you will try to post same text on few subreddits they will shadowban you and delete everything.
Any extra tips?
>>16783214Pick one of these https://www.usnews.com/education/best-colleges/ivy-league-schools and do a PhD
>>16783426What a stupid idea. What is the point to go to some school? I have my theory already written. Schools won't make it better.
>>16783523The point is so you can publish it. If you want to join an academic circle that maintains a journal, you need to pay the membership fee with your time and your money. No one gets into the club for free. Nor should they.
>>16783537This is retarded. If you have new theory they should want it. If they put some paywall, then the whole science is a joke.
>>16783603No, they shouldn't. And philosophy isn't a science, it's a game. If you're lazy, fat, don't know the rules, and don't help maintain the sandbox, why would anyone want to play with you?
>>16783618If someone invented new big theory, the real science should listen to this person and help him publish it everywhere, for free.If it is different, then science is a joke and fraud.Philosophy is a science, one of the most important ones.
>>16783652No, it's a word game. If you invented some actual new science, like contact lenses that connect to your brain and shoot out lasers that melt steel beams whenever you think them to, you could walk into any faculty lounge, demonstrate it, and the real science would listen to you.
>>16776215Publish it to your personal blog, then go about figuring out how to use your discoveries to make a living for yourself and to make your community a better place. Naturally, people will want to ask questions and hear you out if your ideas are novel enough that they're making a noticeable improvement in the world around you. Ultimately, it's not all your idea, so don't let your discoveries become your identity; they're the synthesis of the ideas of the great thinkers who lived a long time ago, moulded and reshaped with some novel contributions of yours.
>>16783671That's pretty much how I got accepted into this PhD program, in retrospect.
>>16783671Philosophy is science and it's more important than stupid contact lenses. Only a nigger could ignore philosophy like that.>>16783737>Ultimately, it's not all your idea, so don't let your discoveries become your identity; they're the synthesis of the ideas of the great thinkers who lived a long time ago, moulded and reshaped with some novel contributions of yours.This is true, I don't need big credits for myself, I just want to prevent some Indian from saying he invented this.
>>16784092No, it's a word game. It doesn't do anything except make you think about things using different words. That's why you can't walk into a faculty lounge and give a compelling demonstration of it. It might be more important to you but being important doesn't make it science. Religion, art, law, also all important. Also not science.
OP's theory is finally published.>>16784341https://singleconsciousness.neocities.org/rate?Where else to publish it? Reddit removes it because it promotes egalitarianism.
>>16784347Lovelock is the most recent proponent of this word game, which he calls the gaia hypothesis. Here he writes about it from the perspective of the atmosphere.https://a.tellusjournals.se/articles/2458/files/submission/proof/2458-1-45308-1-10-20221012.pdf
Where and how to publish this? I tried reddit and they removed everything. Reddit is a controlled opposition.>>16784362I will read this and comment.
Reddit automatically removes this theory from everywhere. What a coincidence.
I checked what are the top social media on the internet, to find a place where I can post this. 90% of internet is either short stupid conversations or boob and ass photos.Do you know where to share this theory?
>>16784521Your fucking blog.
>>16784696There is, https://singleconsciousness.neocities.org/But nobody will find and visit it. How to publish on reddit without them removing everything?
Where would you post philosophical theory?
>>16784905Search engine crawl all over the internet. Maybe elaborate a little on what does your theory aim to answer things people searching for? Your theory on oneness lacks actionable mechanism to achieve that state. Like music band in harmony require synchronization on tuning and rhythm by focus on what is out of tune and off beats in the beginning and make efforts adjusting the individual, what are the essense of synchronization that help people reach that goal?
>>16785096>Maybe elaborate a little on what does your theory aim to answer things people searching for?To answer that there is kind of single "person" (consciousness receiver) and that we need to avoid suffering in the whole universe, because every time animal or human suffers, it is you/me, the single consciousness. And in our planet Earth, most life is suffering, just look at animals raised for meat. We have to stop this.
>>16784425Destroy reddit.
How to hire indians to post the theory on reddit and other places?
>>16786700I don't know.
>>16786700You're a narcissist asshole who says he'll do something but doesn't do it.>>16784362>I will read this and comment.No one needs a new philosophy of narcissism, we already have it.
>>16787200>You're a narcissist asshole who says he'll do something but doesn't do it.But I did publish the theory, it's herehttps://singleconsciousness.neocities.org/>>16784341
