[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/sci/ - Science & Math

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • Use with [math] tags for inline and [eqn] tags for block equations.
  • Right-click equations to view the source.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: pills-drugs.gif (839 KB, 498x249)
839 KB
839 KB GIF
Let's for simplicity assume that average IQ is 100. Can you derive from an IQ of 150 that the individual has the brain power of one and a half people?

Or is this correlation a function as in the brain power is only akin to one and one fourth normal people for example? Or maybe even 2?
>>
File: Sneephen Chucking.png (988 KB, 960x720)
988 KB
988 KB PNG
Let this thread end here.
>>
>>16778265
The mere mention of IQ comparison seemed to have caused an association of boasting in you, making your reaction immediately hostile even though there was no social or humane value attributed to high/low IQ in the original post.
>>
>>16778239
>Let's for simplicity assume that average IQ is 100. Can you derive from an IQ of 150 that the individual has the brain power of one and a half people?
No. But you can derive that he scores better in an IQ test than (0.5+erf(((150-100)/15)/2**0.5)/2)*100 % of people
>>
>>16778273
>The mere mention of IQ as an absolute measure of intelligence seems to have caused you to assert that I'm a fucking retard
Kill. Your. Thread.
>>
>>16778239
You seem to assume the 'points' of IQ stand for some physical measure of brainpower. Rather, it is a statistical tool that is useful due to having Gaussian distribution properties. It is an artificial metric in that 100 was chosen as the mean and its standard distribution is about 12 or 15 (depending on the test). If you want to derive some sort of comparative brainpower metric, you'll either have to draw from something else or you'll end up with some very shaky line in the sand.
>>
>>16778239
iq comes from specific brain algorithms that only some people have.
>>
>>16778291
Measure of intelligence seems to be a very sensitive topic to you personally. You should try taking manners just as seriously.
>>
>>16778239
friend, just stop it. first of all, your post suggests that you might be on the 0.75 humans side - not the 1.5 humans side.
Secondly, what the fuck is brain power and what the fuck do you think IQ measures? There are better ways to indulge in yourself than abusing the "I can memorize 13 numbers and can cognitively rotate objects fast enough"-number for it.
Being highly intelligent while socially at the bottom of society is a curse anyway, it'll just either turn you into Ted or make you kys
>>
>>16778239
"Brain power" is not a quantity that sums over groups of people, nor is it a well-defined quantity at all. You could try to compare required man-hours to complete a task. Someone with an IQ of 150 might perform a task more quickly than two people of 100 IQ. But there is no formula for converting IQ to a reduction of man-hours for a particular task, because this effect varies with the task, the individual's intelligence profile, and other factors.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.